Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T22:26:51.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The fine-tuning argument: the ‘design inference’ version

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2006

GRAHAM WOOD
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, University of Tasmania, Locked Bag 1340, Launceston, Tasmania 7250, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

William Dembski claims that the fine-tuning supports the inference that the universe was designed. His ‘design inference’ is based on the identification of two features of the fine-tuning. Dembski claims that it is a ‘specified’ event of small (a priori) probability. Specification, in this context, is the ability to describe an event without using any knowledge of the actual event itself. I argue that we currently do not have the ability to describe accurately the fine-tuning of the universe without using any knowledge of the fine-tuning itself. If we cannot generate a specification, then the fine-tuning is not a specified event, so the ‘design inference’ is not justified.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press