Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T06:45:40.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The modal gap: the objective problem of Lessing's ditch(es) and Kierkegaard's subjective reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2006

MATTHEW A. BENTON
Affiliation:
Yale Divinity School, 409 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT, 06511
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This essay expands upon the suggestion that Lessing's infamous ‘ditch’ is actually three ditches: temporal, metaphysical, and existential gaps. It examines the complex problems these ditches raise, and then proposes that Kierkegaard's Fragments and Postscript exhibit a similar triadic organizational structure, which may signal a deliberate attempt to engage and respond to Lessing's three gaps. Viewing the Climacean project in this way offers an enhanced understanding of the intricacies of Lessing's rationalist approach to both religion and historical truth, and illuminates Climacus's subjective response to Lessing.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press