Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T18:29:57.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New design arguments: old Millian objections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2000

DAVID B. MYERS
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Moorhead State University, Moorhead, MN 56563
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

An increasing number of natural scientists are doubling as natural theologians. I critically examine two recent defences of the design argument by biologists: Darwin's Black Box by Michael Behe and Nature's Destiny by Michael Denton. Each claims that recent findings in biology provide new evidence for belief in a supernatural designer. For the sake of argument, I grant both the validity and soundness of their arguments. What I then try to show is that even if we grant that the new biology supports a supernatural designer, J. S. Mill's objections, based on ordinary observation, still make it reasonable to doubt that the designer is the God of traditional theism – a being infinite in power, knowledge, and goodness.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press