Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T05:14:08.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Open theism: does God risk or hope?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2006

JAMES D. RISSLER
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, 100 Malloy Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Open theists have generally affirmed that God exercises general sovereignty, seeking to achieve an overall providential goal related to our freely choosing to love Him, though the path to that goal is uncertain. This understanding of God's relationship to the world has the implication that God risks failure in achieving His purpose, since His success ultimately depends upon our free choices. In this paper, I first outline some concerns about the risks involved in God's exercising general sovereignty, and then explain how an alternative ‘hopeful’ view alleviates these concerns. I conclude that the hopeful view is a promising alternative that deserves further exploration.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press