Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T14:48:01.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Proper functionalism: A better alternative?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 1998

SHAWN DAWSON
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Classics, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0A2
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this paper, I develop some internal problems with Alvin Plantanga's proper functionalist epistemology. I focus on: (1) how we know that a belief is the result of proper function and the special difficulties this occasions for religious beliefs; (2) what a properly functioning person should believe in various circumstances, and (3) the problem of design – whether the claim that God designed us can be reconciled with the claim that He was subject to trade-offs, compromises and unintended by-products. These serious internal problems cast doubt upon proper functionalism's fruitfulness as a theory of knowledge.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press