Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T19:43:11.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scientific Explanations of Mystical Experiences

II: The Challange of Theism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Evan Fales
Evan Fales
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Part I of this paper, I took up a challenge posed by Alston (1991), Wainwright (1981), Yandell (1993), and other theists who hold the rather natural view that mystical experiences provide perceptual contact with God, roughly on a par with the access sense experience affords to the natural world. These theists recognize, at the same time, that the plausibility of this view would be significantly compromised by the possibility of scientifically explaining mystical experiences – especially if a scientific explanation were incompatible with, ruled out, or made unlikely the supposition that God has anything special to do with the occurrences of these experiences.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , September 1996, pp. 297 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alston, William P. (1991). Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Daniel, Batson C. and Ventis, W. Larry. (1982). The Religious Experience: A Social–Psychological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, Erika (ed.) (1973). Religions, Altered States of Consciousness, and Social Change. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, Erika (1979). Psychological Anthropology: An Introduction to Human Nature and Cultural Differences. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bowers, Malcolm B. and Freedman, Daniel X. (1966). ‘“Psychedelic” Experiences in Acute Psychosis’. In Altered States of Consciousness: A Book of Readings (ed. Tart, Charles T.), pp. 463–76. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Carroll, Michael P. (1983). ‘Visions of the Virgin Mary: The Effect of Family Structures on Marian Apparitions’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion XXII, 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covington, Dennis (1995). Salvation on Sand Mountain: Snake Handling and Redemption in Southern Appalachia. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Crapanzano, Vincent and Vivian, Garrison (eds) (1977). Case Studies in Spirit Possession. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Davis, Caroline Franks. (1989). The Evidential Force of Religious Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fales, Evan (1976). ‘Truth, Tradition and Rationality’, Philosophy of the Social Science VI, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fales, Evan (1977). ‘The Ontological Status of Social Roles’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences VII, 139–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Don and Jarnette, James de (1972). ‘Hypnotic Susceptibility and Religious Experiences’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion XI, 152–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Felicitas D. (1972). Speaking in Tongues: A Cross Cultural Study of Glossolalia. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Greeley, Andrew M. (1975). The Sociology of the Paranormal: A Reconnaissance. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hay, , David, and Ann, Morisy (1978). ‘Reports of Ecstatic, Paranormal, or Religious Experience in Great Britain and the United States – A Comparison of Trends’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion XVII, 255–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, Brian (1987). ‘Alliances and Ritual Ecstasy: Human Responses to Resource Stress’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion XXVI, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgard, Ernest R. (1986). Divided Consciousness: Multiple Controls in Human Thought and Action. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Hood, Ralph W. (1978). ‘Anticipatory Set and Setting: Stress Incongruities as Elicitors of Mystical Experience in Solitary Nature Situations’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion XVII, 279–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, , David, (1976) [1757]. The Natural History of Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
James, William (1902). The Varieties of Religious Experience, New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alisdaire (1964). ‘Is Understanding Religion Compatible with Believing?’, reprinted in Bryan, Wilson (ed.), Rationality. New York: Harper & Row (1970).Google Scholar
Needham, Rodney (1962). Structure and Sentiment; a Test Case in Social Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Poloma, Margaret M. and Pendleton, Brian F. (1989). ‘Religious Experiences, Evangelism, and Institutional Growth within the Assemblies of God’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion XXVIII, 415–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samarin, William J. (1972). Tongues of Men and Angels: The Religious Language of Pentecostalism. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
William, Sargant (1974). The Mind Possessed: A Physiology of Possession, Mysticism and Faith Healing. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Spanos, Nicholas P. and Patricia, Moretti (1988). ‘Correlates of Mystical and Diabolical Experiences in a Sample of Female University Students’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion XXVII, 105–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, Nicholas P. (1989). ‘Hypnosis, Demonic Possession and Multiple Personality’, in Altered States of Consciousness and Mental Health: A Cross-cultural Perspective (ed. Ward, Colleen A.). Newbury Park, California: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Spencer, Baldwin and Gillen, F. J. (1989). Native Tribes of Central Australia. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Spilka, Bernard, Hood, Ralph W. and Richard, R. Gorsuch, (1985). The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Starbuck, Edwin D. (1912). The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Study of the Growth of Religious Consciousness, 3rd ed. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney and Glock, Charles Y. (1968). American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1979). The Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Douglas M. (1951). The Black Carib of Honduras. New York: Werner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.Google Scholar
Eugene, Thomas L. and Cooper, Pamela E. (1978). ‘Measurement and Incidence of Mystical Experiences: An Exploratory Study’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion XVII, 433–7.Google Scholar
Wainwright, William J. (1981). Mysticism: A Study of Its Nature, Cognitive Value and Moral Implications. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Yandell, Keith E. (1993). The Epistemology of Religious Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar