^{page 263 note 1} Knox, John Jr., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. pp. 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 263 note 2} ibid.

^{page 264 note 1} Knox, John Jr,., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 264 note 2} ibid., p. 90.

^{page 265 note 1} Knox, John Jr,., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 267 note 1} Knox, John Jr,., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 267 note 2} ibid.

^{page 267 note 3} ibid.

^{page 267 note 4} ibid.

^{page 269 note 1} Knox, John Jr,., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar More specifically, Knox suggests that the above condition is a necessary assumption of his thesis that the application of criteria of personal identity is irrelevant to one's own ultimate distinctness. Since I believe his attempt to base the intelligibility of the distinction between a self and its mind upon this thesis involves essentially the same errors as I pointed out in the first section, I shall not comment upon his arguments in support of that thesis.

^{page 270 note 1} Knox, John Jr,., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 271 note 1} Knox, John Jr., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^{page 272 note 1} Knox, John Jr., ‘Can the Self Survive the Death of its Mind?’ Religious Studies, Vol. 5, September 1969, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar