Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T14:11:51.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

John Baylis
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I am greatly obliged to Cees Wiebes and Bert Zeeman for their illuminating comments on my treatment of the Post-Hostilities Report ‘Security in Western Europe and the North Atlantic’. Although my assessment of the report was not, as they suggest, ‘a central feature of my article’ (two out of fifteen pages) the points they make are nevertheless very valuable.

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 1984, pp. 251 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Memoranda by Eden and the COS and minutes, 20 September-12 October 1944, FO 371/ 39080/13577, 13519, 14202; and minutes of meeting, 4 October 1944, FO 371/43336/6177.

2. See Rothwell, Britain and the Cold War 1941–47 (London, 1982), p. 123.

3. P.H.P. (44) 27 (0). Final. ‘Security in Western Europe and the North Atlantic’, 9 November 1944, CAB 21/1614.

4. Despite Jebb's unhappiness about certain parts of the November report there were other parts that were ‘music to his ears’. Rothwell, op. cit., p. 123.