Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T14:23:17.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Specialized techniques in rehabilitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

Nadina Lincoln
Nadina Lincoln*
Affiliation:
Stroke Research Unit, General Hospital, Nottingham
*
Dr Nadina Lincoln, Stroke Research Unit, General Hospital, Park Row, Nottingham NG1 6HA, UK.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Rehabilitation
Information
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , May 1991, pp. 171 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1Squires, AJ. Rehabilitation of the older patient. London: Croom Helm, 1988.Google Scholar
2Smyth, L. Practical physiotherapy with older people. London: Chapman & Hall, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Andrews, K. Rehabilitation of the older adult. London: Edward Arnold, 1987.Google Scholar
4Gravell, R. Communication problems in elderly people: practical approaches to management. London: Croom Helm, 1988.Google Scholar
5Andrews, K. Rehabilitation of conditions associated with old age. Int Rehabil Med 1985; 7: 125–29.Google ScholarPubMed
6Howard, D. Beyond randomised control trials: the case for effective case studies of the effects of treatment in aphasia. Br J Disord Commun 1986; 21: 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Sunderland, A. Single-case experiments in neurological rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1990; 4: 181–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Geriatric Medicine. Physiotherapy with elderly patients: guidelines in good practice. London: Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Geriatric Medicine, 1985.Google Scholar
9Hasselkus, BR. Occupational and physical therapy in geriatric rehabilitation. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics 1989; 7: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Squires, AJ. Physiotherapy assessment of the older patient. Physiotherapy 1986; 72: 617–20.Google Scholar
11Squires, AJ, Dolbear, R, Smoker, S, Williams, R. Evaluation of physiotherapy in a day unit. Physiotherapy 1987; 73: 596–98.Google Scholar
12Sodipo, OI, Lewith, GT. Physiotherapy for walking difficulties in elderly people – a pilot study to compare community and hospital based treatment. Physiotherapy 1985; 71: 61–63.Google Scholar
13May, D, Nayak, USL, Isaacs, B. The life space diary: a measure of mobility in old people at home. Int Rehabil Med 1985; 7: 182–86.Google ScholarPubMed
14Bendall, MJ, Bassey, EJ, Pearson, MB. Factors affecting walking speed of elderly people. Age Ageing 1989; 18: 327–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Mathias, S, Nayak, USL, Isaacs, B. Balance in elderly patients: the ‘get up and go’ test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 387–89.Google Scholar
16Tangalos, EG, Freeman, PI. Assessment of geriatric patients – spreading the word. Mayo Clin Proc 1988; 63: 305–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Collen, F, Wade, DT, Bradshaw, CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud 1990; 12: 6–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Stone, M. Physiotherapy support to a domiciliary care scheme for physically handicapped elderly people. Physiotherapy 1987; 73: 227–29.Google Scholar
19De Weerdt, W, Harrison, M. Problem list of stroke patients as identified in problem oriented medical record. Aust J Physiotherapy 1985; 31: 146–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20McCallum, N. Physiotherapy service to the elderly: a survey of GPs' opinions. Physiotherapy 1987; 73: 6–9.Google Scholar
21Hagberg, JM, Graves, JE, Limacher, M et al. Cardiovascular responses of 70–79 year old men and women to exercise training. J Appl Physiol 1989; 66: 2589–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Amundsen, LR, De Vahl, JM, Ellingham, CT. Evaluation of a group exercise program for elderly women. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 475–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Naso, F, Carner, E, Blankfort-Doyle, W, Coughey, K. Endurance training in the elderly nursing home patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 241–43.Google ScholarPubMed
24Thompson, RF, Crist, DM, Marsh, M, Rosenthal, M. Effects of physical exercise for elderly patients with physical impairments. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988; 36: 130–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Dacher, JE. Rehabilitation and the geriatric patient. Nurs Clin North Am 1989; 24: 225–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Dickstein, R, Hocherman, S, Pillar, T, Shaham, R. Stroke rehabilitation: three exercise therapy approaches. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1233–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Lord, JP, Hall, K. Neuromuscular re-education versus traditional programs for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 88–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Wagenaar, RC, Meijar, OG, van Wieringen, PCW et al. The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neurodevelopmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. Scand J Rehabil Med 1990; 22: 1–8.Google ScholarPubMed
29Partridge, CJ, Edward, SM, Mee, R, van Langenberghe, HVK. Hemiplegic shoulder pain: a study of two methods of physiotherapy treatment. Clin Rehabil 1990; 4: 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Ince, LP, Leon, MS, Christidis, D. EMG biofeedback for improvement of upper limb extremity function: a critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy Canada 1985; 37: 12–17.Google Scholar
31De Weerdt, W, Harrison, MA. The efficacy of EMG feedback for stroke patients: a critical review of the main literature. Physiotherapy 1986; 72: 108–18.Google Scholar
32Burnside, IG, Tobias, HS, Bursill, D. Electromyographic feedback in the remobilization of stroke patients: a controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 217–22.Google ScholarPubMed
33Crow, JL, Lincoln, NB, Nouri, FM, De Weerdt, W. The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. Int Disabil Studies 1989; 11: 155–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Basmajian, JV, Gowland, CA, Brandslater, ME, Swanson, LR, Trotter, JE. EMG biofeedback treatment of upper limb in hemiplegic stroke patients: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 613–16.Google ScholarPubMed
35John, J. Failure of electromyographic feedback to augment the effects of physiotherapy in stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 1986; 9: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36De Weerdt, W, Crossley, SM, Lincoln, NB, Harrison, MA. Restoration of balance in stroke patients: a single case design study. Clin Rehabil 1989; 3: 139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Forster, A, Young, J. A randomised trial of day hospital and community physiotherapy for stroke patients [Abstract]. Clin Rehabil 1990; 4: 338.Google Scholar
38Collen, F, Wade, D. Residual mobility problems after stroke (in preparation).Google Scholar
39Holden, J, Fernie, G. Extent of artificial limb use following rehabilitation. J Orthop Res 1987; 5: 562–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Stephen, P, Hunter, J, Aitken, RCB. Morbidity survey of lower limb amputees. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 181–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Middaugh, S, Levin, RB, Kee, WG, Barchiesi, FD, Roberts, JM. Chronic pain: its treatment in geriatric and younger patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 69: 1021–26.Google Scholar
42Hempsall, VJ, Robertson, DRC, Campbell, MJ, Briggs, RS. Orthopaedic geriatric care – is it effective? J R Coll Phys [Lond[ 1990; 24: 47–50.Google ScholarPubMed
43Obonyo, T, Drummond, M, Isaacs, B. Domiciliary physiotherapy for old people who have fallen. Int Rehabil Med 1983; 5: 157–60.Google ScholarPubMed
44Panush, RS. Exercise and arthritis. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1989; 4: 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45Kreindler, H, Lewis, CB, Rush, S, Shaefer, K. Effects of three exercise protocols on strength of persons with osteoarthritis of the knee. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1989; 4: 23–31.Google Scholar
46Palmer, SS, Mortimer, JA, Webster, DD, Bisterins, R, Dickinson, GL. Exercise therapy for Parkinson's disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 741–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Crossley, SM. Intensive physiotherapy for Parkinson's disease in a holiday environment. Physiotherapy 1986; 72: 24–25.Google Scholar
48Banks, MA, Laird, FI. Physiotherapy benefits patients with Parkinson's disease. Clin Rehabil 1989; 3:11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Sainty, M. Effective identification of elderly patients requiring occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther 1990; 53: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Eakin, P. Assessments of activities of daily living: a critical review. Br J Occup Ther 1989; 52: 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Eakin, P. Problems with assessments of activities of daily living. Br J Occup Ther 1989; 52: 50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Barer, D, Nouri, FM. Measuremént of activities of daily living. Clin Rehabil 1989; 3: 179–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Mahoney, FI, Barthel, DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J 1965; 14: 61–65.Google ScholarPubMed
54Katz, S. Assessing self maintenance ADL, mobility and instrumental ADL. J Am Geriatr Soc 1983; 31: 721–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55Asberg, KH, Sonn, U. The cumulative structure of personal and instrumental ADL. Scand J Rehabil Med 1988; 21: 171–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56Pattie, AH, Gilleard, CJ. Manual of the Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1979.Google Scholar
57Wilkin, D, Jolley, DJ. Behavioural problems among old people in geriatric wards 1976–1978. Research Report No. 1. Manchester: Department of Psychiatry and Community Medicine, University of Manchester, 1979.Google Scholar
58Leng, NRC, Taylor, SR, Hanley, O. A rating scale for assessing elderly patients. Br J Occup Ther 1988; 51: 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Garraway, WM, Akhtar, AJ, Prescott, RJ, Hockey, L. Management of acute stroke in the elderly: preliminary results of a controlled trial. Br Med J 1980; 280: 1040–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60Davies, ADM, Gargaro, P, Dodd, A, Smith, C. Mental status and occupational therapy outcome in teaching dressing skills to the disabled elderly. Clin Rehabil 1989; 3: 293–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61Lundgren-Lindquist, B, Rundgren, A. Functional capacity among the elderly in Sweden. Int Disabil Studies 1988; 10: 6–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Turner, A, Humphris, GM. A brief activities of daily living measure to assess dependency of psychogeriatric patients with change of location. Br J Occup Ther 1989; 52: 339–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63Raikes, S, Sheppard, L, Stephens, L. Development of an occupational therapy service in residential homes for elderly people. Br J Occup Ther 1989; 52: 383–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64Pain, HSB, McLellan, DL. The use of individualized booklets after a stroke. Clin Rehabil 1990; 4: 265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65Edmans, JA, Lincoln, NB. The frequency of perceptual deficits after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 273–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66Siev, E, Freishtat, B. Perceptual dysfunction in the adult stroke patient. New Jersey: Slack Inc., 1976.Google Scholar
67Lincoln, NB. The assessment and treatment of perceptual deficits. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1990 (in press).Google Scholar
68Leng, NRC, Copello, AG. Rehabilitation of memory after brain injury: is there an effective technique? Clin Rehabil 1990; 4: 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69Holden, U. The value of reality orientation in 1987. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 235–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70Miller, E. Reality orientation with psychogeriatric patients: the limitations. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 231–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71Lewis, M, Butler, RN. Life review therapy: putting memories to work in individual and group psychotherapy. Geriatrics 1974; 29: 165–69.Google ScholarPubMed
72Bennett, SL, Maas, F. The effect of music based life review on the life satisfaction and ego integrity of elderly people. Br J Occup Ther 1988; 51: 433–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73Holden, UP, Wood, SRT. Reality orientation: psychological approaches to the confused elderly. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone, 1982.Google Scholar
74Conroy, MC, Fincham, F, Agard-Evans, C. Can they do anything? Ten single subject studies of the engagement level of hospitalized demented patients. Br J Occup Ther 1988; 51: 129–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
75Smart, S. Computers as treatment: the use of the computer as an occupational therapy medium. Clin Rehabil 1988; 2: 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
76Robertson, I. Does computerised cognitive rehabilitation work? A review. Aphasiology (in press).Google Scholar
77Weisman, S. Computer games for the frail elderly. Gerontologist 1983; 23: 361–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
78Whitaker, JJ, Hornby, J. A review of home visits by occupational therapists in a geriatric assessment unit. Br J Occup Ther 1986; 49: 365–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79Mutch, WJ, Swallow, MW, Baker, M, Beazley, J, Oxtoby, M. A pilot study of patient rated disability and the need for aids in Parkinson's disease. Clin Rehabil 1989; 3: 151–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
80Enderby, P, Davies, P. Communication disorders: planning a service to meet the needs. Br J Disord Commun 1989; 24: 301–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
81Wimbury, R, McMaster, C, Briggs, RS. Which elderly admissions are referred for speech therapy? An audit and an intervention. Clin Rehabil 1990; 4: 261–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82Robertson, SJ, Thompson, F. Speech therapy in Parkinson's disease: a study of the efficacy and long term effects of treatment. Br J Disord Commun 1984; 19: 213–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83Mclntosh, J, Martin, G, Sacchett, C. Recognition of the diverse and complex nature of neuromuscular swallowing disorders: a basis for treatment. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84Rhonda, AU, Martin, AL, Obler, LK. The relation of aphasia to dementia. Aphasiology 1988; 2: 161–73.Google Scholar
85Walker, SA. Dementia and dysphasia: like asking a blind man to describe an elephant. Aphasiology 1988; 2: 175–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
86Bryan, KL, Drew, S. A survey of communication disability in an elderly population in residential care. Int J Rehab Res 1989; 12: 330–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
87Lincoln, NB, McGuirk, E, Mulley, GP, Lendrem, W, Jones, AC, Mitchell, JRA. Effectiveness of speech therapy for aphasic stroke patients: a randomised control trial. Lancet 1984; i. 1197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
88Werz, RT, Weiss, DF, Aten, JL et al. Comparison of clinic, home and deferred language treatment for aphasia: a Veterans Administration Co-operative Study. Arch Neurol 1986; 43: 653–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89Brindley, P, Copeland, M, Demain, C, Martyn, P. A comparison of the speech of 10 chronic Broca's aphasics following intensive and non-intensive periods of therapy. Aphasiology 1989; 3: 695–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
90Moody, S. Remediation of acquired dyslexia. Clin Rehabil 1987; 2: 291–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91Holland, AL. Communicative abilities in daily living. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980.Google Scholar
92Davis, GA, Wilcox, MJ. Adult aphasia rehabilitation: applied pragmatics. Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1985.Google Scholar
93Aten, JL, Caligiuri, MP, Holland, AL. The efficacy of functional communication therapy for chronic aphasic patients. J Speech Hear Disord 1982; 47: 93–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94McLellan, DL. Training for a rehabilitation team. Br J Occup Ther 1985; 48: 228–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
95Waters, KR. The role of nursing in rehabilitation. CARE Science and Practice 1987; 5: 17–21.Google Scholar
96Myco, F. Stroke and its rehabilitation: the perceived role of the nurse in medical and nursing literature. J Adv Nurs 1984; 9: 429–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
97Newman, D. Essential physical therapy for stroke patients. Nursing Times 1985; 81: 17–18.Google ScholarPubMed
98Henderson, VA. Preserving the essence of nursing in a technological age. J Adv Nurs 1980; 5: 245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99Walley, M. Ward sisters concept of rehabilitation [Thesis]. Southampton: University of Southampton, 1986.Google Scholar
100Atkinson, FI, Sklaroff, SA. Acute hospital wards and the disabled patient: a survey of the experiences of patients and nurses. Edinburgh: Nursing Research Unit Report. University of Edinburgh, 1984.Google Scholar
101Carr, EK, Hawthorn, PJ. Lip function and eating after a stroke: a nursing perspective. J Adv Nurs 1988; 13: 447–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
102Cheater, FM. Urinary incontinence in hospital inpatients: a nursing perspective [Thesis]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, 1990.Google Scholar
103Hudson, M, Hawthorn, PJ. Stroke patients in the community. Nursing Times 1988; 84: 51.Google Scholar
104Miller, A. Nurse/patient dependency – is it iatrogenic? J Adv Nursing 1985; 10: 63–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
105Fielding, P. The care of elderly people. In: Clark, JM, Hockey, L eds. Further research for nursing. London: Scutari Press, 1989.Google Scholar
106Mead, D. Primary nursing and quality assurance. Nursing Times 1990; 86: 71–72.Google ScholarPubMed
107Pearson, A, Durant, I, Punton, S. Determining quality in a unit in which nursing is the primary intervention. J Adv Nurs 1989; 14: 269–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
108Lewis, NA. Functional gains in CVA patients: a nursing approach. Rehabilitation Nursing 1986; 11: 25–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
109Hamrin, E. Early activation in stroke – does it make a difference? Scand J Rehabil Med 1982; 14: 111–16.Google Scholar
110Bond, S, Bond, J. Outcomes of care within a multiple case study in the evaluation of the experimental NHS nursing homes. Age Ageing 1990; 19: 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar