Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T17:50:29.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distributed control of multiple non-holonomic robots with sector vision and range-only measurements for target capturing with collision avoidance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2014

A. Zakhar'eva,
A. S. Matveev,
M. C. Hoy and
A. V. Savkin
A. Zakhar'eva
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Mechanics, St Petersburg University, St Petersburg, Russia
A. S. Matveev
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Mechanics, St Petersburg University, St Petersburg, Russia
M. C. Hoy*
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
A. V. Savkin
Affiliation:
School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: mch.hoy@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We consider a team of autonomous kinematically controlled non-holonomic planar Dubins car-like vehicles. The team objective is to encircle a given target so that all vehicles achieve a common and pre-specified distance from it and are uniformly distributed over the respective circle, and the entire formation rotates around the target with a prescribed angular velocity. The robots do not communicate with each other and any central decision-maker. The sensing capacity of any vehicle is heavily restricted: It has access only to the distance to the target and to the distances to the companion vehicles that are in a given disc sector centered at the vehicle at hand; no robot can distinguish between its companions, and does not know their parameters. A distributed control law is proposed, and mathematically rigorous proofs of its non-local convergence as well as collision avoidance property are presented. The performance of the control law is illustrated by computer simulations and experiments with real robots.

Keywords

Control of robotic systemsMobile robotsMulti-robot systemsNavigationSwarm robotics

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , February 2015, pp. 385 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

References

1.Pettersen, K. Y., Gravdahl, J. T. and Nijmeijer, H. (eds.), Group Coordination and Cooperative Control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 336 (Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Antonelli, G.. Underwater Robots, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2006).Google Scholar
3.Arora, A., Dutta, P., Bapat, S., Kulathumani, V., Zhang, H., Naik, V., Mittal, V., Cao, H., Demirbas, M., Gouda, M., et al., “A line in the sand: A wireless sensor network for target detection, classification, and tracking,” Comput. Netw. 46 (5), 605–634 (2004).Google Scholar
4.Bernhart, A., “Polygons of pursuit,” Scr. Math. 24, 23–50 (1959).Google Scholar
5.Camhi, J. M. and Johnson, E. N., “High-frequency steering maneuvers mediated by tactile cues: Antennal wall-following in the cockroach,” J. Exp. Biol. 202, 631–643 (1999).Google Scholar
6.Ceccarelli, N., DiMarco, M., Garulli, A. and Giannitrapani, A., “Collective circular motion of multi-vehicle systems,” Automatica 44 (12), 3025–3035 (2008).Google Scholar
7.Chen, Y. and Wang, Z., “Formation Control: A Review and a New Consideration,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (Aug. 2005) pp. 3181–3186.Google Scholar
8.Fajen, B. R., “Steering toward a goal by equalizing taus,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27 (4), 953–968 (2001).Google Scholar
9.Fax, J. A. and Murray, R. M., “Information flow and cooperative control of vehicles formations,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49 (9), 1465–1476 (2004).Google Scholar
10.Gadre, A. and Stilwell, D. J., “Toward Underwater Navigation Based on Range Measurements from a Single Location,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004 (ICRA '04), New Orleans, LA (Apr. 2004) pp. 4472–4477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Guo, J., Yan, G. and Lin, Z., “Local control strategy for moving-target-enclosing under dynamically changing network topology,” Syst. Control Lett. 59 (10), 654–661 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hernández-Martínez, E. G. and Aranda-Bricaire, E., “Convergence and Collision Avoidance in Formation Control: A Survey of the Artificial Potential Functions Approach,” In:Multi-Agent Systems – Modeling, Control, Programming, Simulations and Applications (Alkhateeb, F., Maghayreh, E. Al and Doush, I. A., eds.) (InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2011) pp. 103–126.Google Scholar
13.El Kamel, M. A., Beji, L. and Abichou, A., “A Strategy for Unicycle's Formation Control Based on Invariance Principle,” Proceedings of the 1st Mediterranean Conference on Intelligent Systems and Automation, Vol. 1019, Annaba, Algeria (Jun. 2008) pp. 498–502.Google Scholar
14.Kawakami, H. and Namerikawa, T., “Consensus Filter-Based Target-Enclosing Strategies for Multiple Nonholonomic Vehicles,” Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancun, Mexico (Dec. 2008) pp. 2282–2287.Google Scholar
15.Kawakami, H. and Namerikawa, T., “Virtual Structure-Based Target-Enclosing Strategies for Nonholonomic Agents,” Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, San Antonio, TX (Sep. 2008) pp. 1043–1048.Google Scholar
16.Kawakami, H. and Namerikawa, T., “Cooperative Target-Capturing Strategy for Multi-Vehicle Systems with Dynamic Network Topology,” Proceedings of the 2009 American Control Conference, St. Louis, MO (Jun. 2009) pp. 635–640.Google Scholar
17.Kim, T., Harab, S. and Hori, Y., “Cooperative control of multi-agent dynamical systems in target-enclosing operations using cyclic pursuit strategy,” Int. J. Control 83 (10), 2040–2052 (2010).Google Scholar
18.Kim, T. and Sugie, T., “Cooperative control for target-capturing task based on a cyclic pursuit strategy,” Automatica 43 (8), 1426–1431 (2007).Google Scholar
19.Kobayashi, Y. and Hosoe, S., “Cooperative enclosing and grasping of an object by decentralized mobile robots using local observation,” Int. J. Soc. Robot. 4 (1) (Oct. 27, 2011). Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12369-011-0118-7.Google Scholar
20.Lan, Y., Yan, G. and Lin, Z., “Distributed control of cooperative target enclosing based on reachability and invariance analysis,” Syst. Control Lett. 59 (7), 381–389 (2010).Google Scholar
21.Manchester, I. R. and Savkin, A. V., “Circular navigation guidance law with incomplete information and uncertain autopilot model,” J. Guid. Control Dyn. 27 (6), 1076–1083 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Manchester, I. R. and Savkin, A. V., “Circular navigation guidance law for precision missile target engagement,” J. Guid. Control Dyn. 29 (2), 314–320 (2006).Google Scholar
23.Marshall, J. A., Broucke, M. E. and Francis, B. A., “Formations of vehicles in cyclic pursuit,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49 (11), 1963–1974 (2004).Google Scholar
24.Marshall, J. A., Broucke, M. E. and Francis, B. A., “Pursuit formations of unicycles,” Automatica 42 (1), 3–12 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Moore, S. W., Bohm, H. and Jensen, V., Underwater Robotics: Science, Design, and Fabrication (Marine Advanced Technology Education, Monterey, CA, 2010).Google Scholar
26.Murray, R. M., “Recent research in cooperative control of multivehicle systems,” J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 129 (5), 571–584 (2007).Google Scholar
27.Pathirana, P. N., Bulusu, N., Savkin, A. V. and Jha, S., “Node localization using mobile robots in delay-tolerant sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 4 (4), 285–296 (Aug. 2005).Google Scholar
28.Sato, K. and Maeda, N., “Target-Enclosing Strategies for Multi-Agent Using Adaptive Control Strategy,” Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Yokohama, Japan (Sep. 2010) pp. 1761–1766.Google Scholar
29.Sepulchre, R., Paley, D. A. and Leonard, N. E., “Group Coordination and Cooperative Control of Steered Particles in the Plane,” In: Group Coordination and Cooperative Control, (Pettersen, K. Y., Gravdahl, J. T. and Nijmeijer, H., eds.), Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 336 (Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 2006) pp. 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Shames, I., Fidan, B. and Anderson, B. D. O., “Close Target Reconnaissance Using Autonomous UAV Formations,” Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancun, Mexico (Dec. 2008) pp. 1729–1734.Google Scholar
31.Sharma, R., Kothari, M., Taylor, C. N. and Postlethwaite, I., “Cooperative Target-Capturing with Inaccurate Target Information,” Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference, Baltimore, MD (Jun. 2010) pp. 5520–5525.Google Scholar
32.Sinha, A. and Ghose, D., “Generalization of nonlinear cyclic pursuit,” Automatica 43 (11), 1954–1960 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Teimoori, H. and Savkin, A. V., “A biologically inspired method for robot navigation in a cluttered environment,” Robotica 28 (5), 637–648 (2010).Google Scholar
34.Teimoori, H. and Savkin, A. V., “Equiangular navigation and guidance of a wheeled mobile robot based on range-only measurements,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 58 (2), 203–215 (2010).Google Scholar
35.Tsumura, K., Hara, S., Sakurai, K. and Kim, T. H., “Performance Competition in Cooperative Capturing by Multi-Agent Systems,” Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Yokohama, Japan (Sep. 2010) pp. 2041–2046.Google Scholar
36.Vinter, R. B., Optimal Control (Birkhäuzer, Boston, MA, 2000).Google Scholar
37.Yamaguchi, H., “A distributed motion coordination strategy for multiple nonholonomic mobile robots in cooperative hunting operations,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 43 (4), 257–282 (2003).Google Scholar
38.Zakhar'eva, A., Matveev, A. S., Hoy, M. C. and Savkin, A. V., “A Strategy for Target Capturing with Collision Avoidance for Non-Holonomic Robots with Sector Vision and Range-Only Measurements,” Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Dubrovnik, Croatia (Oct. 2012) pp. 1503–1508.Google Scholar
39.Zhi-Wei, H., Jia-Hong, L., Ling, C. and Bing, W., “Survey on the Formation Control of Multi-Agent System,” Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference, Hefei, China (Jul. 2012) pp. 6092–6098.Google Scholar