Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T18:21:41.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic control with adaptive identification for free-flying space robots in joint space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Jin-Ho Shin and
Ju-Jang Lee
Jin-Ho Shin
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 371–1 Kusong-dong Yusong-gu Taejon 305–701 (Korea)
Ju-Jang Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 371–1 Kusong-dong Yusong-gu Taejon 305–701 (Korea)
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this paper, a joint space dynamic control scheme with an adaptive identifier is proposed for free-flying space robots. The control in Cartesian space poses a measurement problem which is critical from a point of view of implementation. In order to overcome this problem, a joint space control is developed. An inverse kinematics algorithm is proposed so as to control free-flying space robots in joint space. Since the inverse kinematic solutions for space robots depend on the dynamic parameters as well as the kinematic.parameters, the accurate estimation of all the unknown parameters is essential to make joint space control possible. Therefore, an off-line adaptive parameter identification is performed for free-flying space robots. Simulation results are given to show the validity and the effectiveness of the presented adaptive identification and dynamic control scheme.

Keywords

Free-flying space robotsJoint space controlInverse kinematicsDynamic controlAdaptive identification

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 12 , Issue 6 , November 1994, pp. 541 - 551
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Longman, R.W., “The Kinetics and Workspace of a Satellite-Mounted Robot” J. Astronautical Science 38, No. 4, 423–440 (1990).Google Scholar
2.Vafa, Z. and Dubowsky, S., “On the Dynamics of Manipulators in Space Using the Virtual Manipulator Approach” Proceedings of 1987 IEEE International Conf. on Robotics and Automation(1987) pp. 579–585.Google Scholar
3.Yoshida, K. and Umetani, Y., “Resolved Motion Rate Control of Space Manipulators with Generalized Jacobian Matrix” IEEE Trans, on Robotics and Automation RA-5, No. 3, 303–314 (1989).Google Scholar
4.Nakamura, Y. and Mukherjee, R., “Nonholonomic Path Planning of Space Robots via a Bidirectional Approach” IEEE Trans, on Robotics and Automation RA-7, No. 4, 500–514 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Papadopoulos, E. and Dubowsky, S., “On the Nature of Control Algorithms for Free-Floating Space Manipulators” IEEE Trans, on Robotics and Automation RA-7, No. 6, 750–758 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Murkherjee, R. and Nakamura, Y., “Formulation and Efficient Computation of Inverse Dynamics of Space Robots” IEEE Trans, on Robotics and Automation RA-8, No. 3, 400–406 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Xu, Y. and Shum, H.Y., “Dynamic control of a space robot system with no thrust jets controlled base” No. CMU-RI-TR-91–33 (The Robotics Institute, CarnegieMellon University, 1991).Google Scholar
8.Gu, Y.-L. and Xu, Y., “A normal form augmentation approach to adaptive control of space robot systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conf. on Robotics and Automation 2(1993) pp. 731–737.Google Scholar
9.Spofford, J.R. and Akin, D.L., “Redundancy Control of a Free-Flying Telerobot” J. Guidance, Navigation and Control 13, No. 3, 515–523 (05–06, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Slotine, J.-J. E. and Li, W., Applied Nonlinear Control (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1991).Google Scholar
11.Slotine, J.-J.E. and Li, W., “Composite Adaptive Control of Robot Manipulators” Automatica 25, No. 4, 509–519 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Wang, Li-C.T. and Chen, C.C., “A Combined Optimization Method for Solving the Inverse Kinematics Problem of Mechanical Manipulators” IEEE Trans, on Robotics and Automation RA-7, No. 4, 489–499 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Craig, J.J., Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control (2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Massachusetts, 1989).Google Scholar
14.Anderson, B.D.O., “Exponential Stability to Linear Equations Arising in Adaptive Identification” IEEE Trans, on Automatic Control AC-22, No. 1, 83–88 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Morgan, A.P. and Narendra, K.S., “On the Uniform Asymptotic Stability of Certain Linear Nonautonomous Differential Equations” SIAM J. Control and Optimization 15, No. 1, 5–24 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Narendra, K.S. and Annaswamy, A.M., Stable Adaptive Systems (Prentice-Hall International Inc., New Jersey, 1989).Google Scholar
17.Astrom, K.J. and Wittenmark, B., Adaptive Control (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Massachusetts, 1989).Google Scholar