Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T08:53:20.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficient motion generation for a six-legged robot walking on irregular terrain via integrated foothold selection and optimization-based whole-body planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2017

Yuan TianOpen the ORCID record for Yuan Tian[Opens in a new window] and
Feng Gao
Yuan Tian
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, P.R. China. E-mail: tianyuan_123abc@sjtu.edu.cn
Feng Gao*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, P.R. China. E-mail: tianyuan_123abc@sjtu.edu.cn
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: gaofengsjtu@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In this paper, an efficient motion planning method is proposed for a six-legged robot walking on irregular terrain. The method provides the robot with fast-generated free-gait motions to traverse the terrain with medium irregularities. We first of all introduce our six-legged robot with legs in parallel mechanism. After that, we decompose the motion planning problem into two main steps: first is the foothold selection based on a local footstep cost map, in which both terrain features and the robot mobility are considered; second is a whole-body configuration planner which casts the problem into a general convex optimization problem. Such decomposition reduces the complexity of the motion planning problem. Along with the two-step planner, discussions are also given in terms of the robot-environmental relationship, convexity of constraints and robot rotation integration. Both simulations and experiments are carried out on typical irregular terrains. The results demonstrate effectiveness of the planning method.

Keywords

six-legged robotmotion planningfoothold selectionoptimization

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , March 2018, pp. 333 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

References

1. Saranli, U., Buehler, M. and Koditschek, D. E., “RHex: A simple and highly mobile hexapod robot,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 20, 616–631 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Kuffner, J. J. Jr, Nishiwaki, K., Kagami, S., Inaba, M. and Inoue, H., “Footstep Planning Among Obstacles for Biped Robots,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2001, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, (Maui, Hawaii, USA, 2001) pp. 500–505.Google Scholar
3. Ayaz, Y., Munawar, K., Malik, M. B., Konno, A. and Uchiyama, M., “Human-like approach to footstep planning among obstacles for humanoid robots,” Int. J. Humanoid Robot. 4, 125–149 (2007).Google Scholar
4. Deits, R. and Tedrake, R., “Footstep Planning on Uneven Terrain with Mixed-integer Convex Optimization,” Proceedings of the Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), 2014 14th IEEE-RAS International Conference on, (Madrid, Spain, 2014) pp. 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kalakrishnan, M., Buchli, J., Pastor, P., Mistry, M. and Schaal, S., “Learning, planning, and control for quadruped locomotion over challenging terrain,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 30, 236–258 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Zucker, M. et al., “Optimization and learning for rough terrain legged locomotion,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 30, 175–191 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Kolter, J. Z. and Ng, A. Y., “The stanford littledog: A learning and rapid replanning approach to quadruped locomotion,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 30, 150–174 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ozguner, F., Tsai, S. and McGhee, R., “An approach to the use of terrain-preview information in rough-terrain locomotion by a hexapod walking machine,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 3, 134–146 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Belter, D. and Skrzypczyński, P., “Rough terrain mapping and classification for foothold selection in a walking robot,” J. Field Robot. 28, 497–528 (2011).Google Scholar
10. Belter, D., “Optimization-based approach for motion planning of a robot walking on rough terrain,” J. Autom. Mobile Robot. Intell. Syst. 7, 34–41 (2013).Google Scholar
11. Belter, D. and Skrzypczyński, P., “Posture Optimization Strategy for a Statically Stable Robot Traversing Rough Terrain,” Proceedings of the Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, (Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal, 2012) pp. 2204–2209.Google Scholar
12. Masehian, E. and Sedighizadeh, D., “Classic and heuristic approaches in robot motion planning-a chronological review,” World Acad. Sci., Eng. Technol. 23, 101–106 (2007).Google Scholar
13. Kavraki, L. E., Švestka, P., Latombe, J.-C. and Overmars, M. H., “Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 12, 566–580 (1996).Google Scholar
14. Kuffner, J. J. and LaValle, S. M., “RRT-connect: An Efficient Approach to Single-query Path Planning,” Proceedings of the Robotics and Automation, 2000. Proceedings. ICRA'00. IEEE International Conference on, (San Francisco, CA, USA, 2000) pp. 995–1001.Google Scholar
15. Hauser, K., Bretl, T., Latombe, J.-C., Harada, K., and Wilcox, B., “Motion planning for legged robots on varied terrain,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 27, 1325–1349 (2008).Google Scholar
16. Ratliff, N., Zucker, M., Bagnell, J. A. and Srinivasa, S., “CHOMP: Gradient Optimization Techniques for Efficient Motion Planning,” Proceedings of the Robotics and Automation, 2009. ICRA'09. IEEE International Conference on, (Kobe, Japan, 2009) pp. 489–494.Google Scholar
17. Kolter, J. Z. and Ng, A. Y., “Task-Space Trajectories Via Cubic Spline Optimization,” in Proceedings of the Robotics and Automation, 2009. ICRA'09. IEEE International Conference on, (2009) pp. 1675–1682.Google Scholar
18. Pan, Y. and Gao, F., “A new 6-parallel-legged walking robot for drilling holes on the fuselage,” Proc. Institution Mech. Eng., C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.ence, 228 (4), 753–764 (2013).Google Scholar
19. Du, H. and Gao, F., “Fault tolerance properties and motion planning of a six-legged robot with multiple faults,” Robotica FirstView, 1–18 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Parallel, J.-P. Merlet Robots, vol. 74, (Springer Science & Business Media, PO Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012).Google Scholar
21. Belter, D., Labecki, P. and Skrzypczynśki, P., “Map-based Adaptive Foothold Planning for Unstructured Terrain Walking,” Proceedings of the Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, (Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 2010) pp. 5256–5261.Google Scholar
22. Kolter, J. Z., Rodgers, M. P. and Ng, A. Y., “A Control Architecture for Quadruped Locomotion Over Rough Terrain,” Proceedings of the - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (Pasadena, CA, USA, 2008) pp. 811–818.Google Scholar
23. Chen, W., Low, K. H. and Yeo, S. H., “Adaptive gait planning for multi-legged robots with an adjustment of center-of-gravity,” Robotica 17 391–403 (1999).Google Scholar
24. Sorkine, O., “Least-squares rigid motion using svd,” Technical Notes 120, 3 (2009).Google Scholar
25. Xu, Y., Gao, F., Pan, Y. and Chai, X., “Method for six-legged robot stepping on obstacles by indirect force estimation,” Chinese J. Mech. Eng. 1–11 (2016).Google Scholar
26. Aps, M.. The MOSEK optimization software. Available: https://mosek.com/ Google Scholar

Tian and Gao supplementary material

Movies

Download Tian and Gao supplementary material(Video)
Video 102.7 MB