Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T12:17:22.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Free-flying robots in space: an overview of dynamics modeling, planning and control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2007

S. Ali A. Moosavian and
Evangelos Papadopoulos
S. Ali A. Moosavian
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of TechnologyPO Box 16765-3381, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: moosavian@kntu.ac.ir
Evangelos Papadopoulos
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece. E-mail: egpapado@central.ntua.gr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Free-flying space manipulator systems, in which robotic manipulators are mounted on a free-flying spacecraft, are envisioned for assembling, maintenance, repair, and contingency operations in space. Nevertheless, even for fixed-base systems, control of mechanical manipulators is a challenging task. This is due to strong nonlinearities in the equations of motion, and consequently different algorithms have been suggested to control end-effector motion or force, since the early research in robotic systems. In this paper, first a brief review of basic concepts of various algorithms in controlling robotic manipulators is introduced. Then, specific problems related to application of such systems in space and a microgravity environment is highlighted. Basic issues of kinematics and dynamics modeling of such systems, trajectory planning and control strategies, cooperation of multiple arm space free-flying robots, and finally, experimental studies and technological aspects of such systems with their specific limitations are discussed.

Keywords

Space roboticsControl algorithmsForce controlImpedance controlDynamics modeling

Information

Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , September 2007, pp. 537 - 547
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

References

1.Ollero, A., Morel, G., Bernus, P., Nof, S. Y., Sasiadek, J., Boverie, S., Erbe, H. and Goodall, R., “Milestone report of the manufacturing and instrumentation coordinating committee: From MEMS to enterprise systems,” Annu. Rev. Control 26 (2), 151–162 2002.Google Scholar
2.Bertoni, G., “Automatic Control in Aerospace,” Proceedings of 15th IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace, Bologna/Forli, Italy 2001.Google Scholar
3.Dubowsky, S., “A perspective of the advancement of robotic systems during the past 15 years,” J. Annu. Rev. Control 22, 111–119 (1998).Google Scholar
4.Bronez, M. A., Clarke, M. M. and Quinn, A., “Requirements Development for a Free-Flying Robot—The ROBIN,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA 1986 pp. 667–672.Google Scholar
5.Reuter, G. J. et al. , “An intelligent, free-flying robot, in space station Automation IV,” (W. C. Chiou ed.) SPIE Proceedings Series 1006, 20–27 1995.Google Scholar
6.Rondeau, S., “Space Robotics,” Proceedings of the IFAC Workshop, St-Hubert, Quebec, Canada 1998.Google Scholar
7.Kawamura, S., Miyazaki, F. and Arimoto, S., “Is a Local Linear PD Feedback Control Law Effective for Trajectory Tracking of Robot Motion?,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Philadelphia, PA 1988 pp. 1335–1340.Google Scholar
8.Leahy, M. B. Jr. and Saridis, G. N., “Compensation of industrial manipulator dynamics,”Int. J. Robot. Res. 8 (4), 73–84 1989.Google Scholar
9.Khosla, P. K. and Kanade, T., “Real-time implementation and evaluation of computed torque scheme,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 5 (2), 245–253 1989.Google Scholar
10.An, C. H., Atkeson, C. G., Griffiths, J. D. and Hollerbach, J. M., “Experimental evaluation of feedforward and computed torque control,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 5 (3), 368–373 1989.Google Scholar
11.Dubowsky, S. and Des Forges, D. T., “The application of model-referenced adaptive control to robotic manipulators,” ASME J. Dynam. Syst., Meas. Control 101, 193–200 1979.Google Scholar
12.Slotine, J. J. E. and Li, W., “Adaptive Robot Control: A New Perspective,” Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Los Angeles, CA 1987 pp. 192–198.Google Scholar
13.Youcef-Toumi, K. and Ito, O., “Controller Design for Systems With Unknown Dynamics,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Minneapolis, MN 1987 pp. 836–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Arimoto, S. and Miyazaki, F., “Can Mechanical Robots Learn by Themselves?,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Robotics Research, Kyoto, Japan 1984 pp. 127–134.Google Scholar
15.Craig, J., Introduction to Robotics, Mechanics and Control (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.Google Scholar
16.Miyazaki, F., Masutani, Y. and Arimoto, S., “Sensor Feed–back Using Approximate Jacobian,” Proceedings of the USA–Japan Symposium on Flexible Automation—Crossing Bridges, Advances in Flexible Automation and Robotics, Minneapolis, MN 1988 pp. 139–145.Google Scholar
17.Chiaverini, S., Sciavicco, L. and Siciliano, B., “Control of robotic systems through singularities,” Proceedings of the International Workshop on Nonlinear and Adaptive Control: Issues in Robotics, Grenoble, France, Nov. 1990; Advanced Robot Control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 162, (C. Canudas de Wit ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, D (1991), pp. 285–295.Google Scholar
18.Asari, Y., Sato, H., Yoshimi, T. and Tatsuno, K., “Development of a Model-Based Remote Maintenance Robot System (IV)—A Practical Stiffness Control Method for Redundant Robot Arm,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Yokohama, Japan 1993 pp. 1245–1251.Google Scholar
19.Hootsmans, N. A. M. and Dubowsky, S., “Large Motion Control of Mobile Manipulators Including Vehicle Suspension Characteristics,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA 1991 pp. 2336–2341.Google Scholar
20.Papadopoulos, E. and Dubowsky, S., “Coordinated Manipulator/Spacecraft Motion Control for Space Robotic Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 1991 pp. 1696–1701.Google Scholar
21.Raibert, M. H. and Craig, J. J., “Hybrid position/force control of manipulators,” ASME J. Dynam. Syst., Meas. Control 126, 126–133 Jun. 1981.Google Scholar
22.Hayati, S., “Hybrid Position/Force Control of Multi-Arm Cooperating Robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA 1986 pp. 82–89.Google Scholar
23.Khatib, O., “A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation,” IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 3 (1), 43–53 1987.Google Scholar
24.Whitney, D. E., “Historical perspective and state of the art in robot force control,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 6 (1), 3–14 1987.Google Scholar
25.Nakamura, Y., Nagai, K. and Yoshikawa, T., “Mechanics of Coordinative Manipulation by Multiple Robotic Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1987 pp. 991–998.Google Scholar
26.Tarn, T. J., Bejczy, A. K. and Yun, X., “Design of Dynamic Control of Two Cooperating Robot Arms: Closed Chain Formulation,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1987 pp. 7–13.Google Scholar
27.Hayward, V. and Hayati, S., “KALI: An Environment for the Programming and Control of Cooperative Manipulators,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Piscataway, NJ 1988 pp. 473–478.Google Scholar
28.Yamaguchi, H., “A distributed motion coordination strategy for multiple nonholonomic mobile robots in cooperative hunting operations,” J. Robot. Autonom. Syst. 43 (4), 257–282 2003.Google Scholar
29.Hogan, N., “Impedance control: An approach to manipulation—a three part paper,” ASME J. Dynam. Syst., Meas. Control 107, 1–24 1985.Google Scholar
30.Caccavale, F. and Villani, L., “Impedance Control for Multi-Arm Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control, Australia 2000 pp. 3465–3470.Google Scholar
31.Caccavale, F. and Villani, L., “An Impedance Control Strategy for Cooperative Manipulation,” Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Italy 2001 pp. 343–348.Google Scholar
32.Biagiotti, L., Liu, H., Hirzinger, G. and Melchiorri, C., “Cartesian Impedance Control for Dexterous Manipulation,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Las Vegas, NV 2003 pp. 3270–3275.Google Scholar
33.Goldenberg, A. A., “Implementation of Force and Impedance Control in Robot Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Philadelphia, PA 1988 pp. 1626–1632.Google Scholar
34.Seraji, H. and Colbaugh, R., “Force Tracking In Impedance Control,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA 1993 pp. 499–506.Google Scholar
35.Jung, S. and Hsia, T. C., “Stability and Convergence Analysis of Robust Adaptive Force Tracking Impedance Control of Robot Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Korea 1999 pp. 635–640.Google Scholar
36.Tischler, N. and Goldenberg, A. A., “Stiffness Control for Geared Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Korea 2001 pp. 3042–3046.Google Scholar
37.Heinrichs, B. and Sepehri, N., “Relationship of Position-Based Impedance Control to Explicit Force Control: Theory and Experiments,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, California 1999 pp. 2072–2078.Google Scholar
38.Love, L. J. and Book, W. J., “Force reflecting teleoperation with adaptive impedance control,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.—Part B: Cybern. 34 (1), 159–165 2004.Google Scholar
39.Ozawa, R. and Kobayashi, H., “A New Impedance Control Concept for Elastic Joint Robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taiwan 2003 pp. 3126–3131.Google Scholar
40.Schneider, A. and Cannon, R. H., “Object impedance control for cooperative manipulation: Theory and experimental results,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 8 (3), pp. 383–394 1992.Google Scholar
41.Meer, D. W. and Rock, S. M., “Coupled-System Stability of Flexible-Object Impedance Control,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Japan 1995 pp. 1839–1845.Google Scholar
42.Braun, B. M., Starr, G. P., Wood, J. E. and Lumia, R., “A framework for implementing cooperative motion on industrial controllers,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 20 (3)583–589 2004.Google Scholar
43.Moosavian, S. Ali A. and Papadopoulos, E., “Multiple Impedance Control for Object Manipulation,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Victoria, Canada 1998 pp. 461–466.Google Scholar
44.Moosavian, S. Ali A. and Rastegari, R., “Multiple-arm space free-flying robots for manipulating objects with force tracking restrictions,” J. Robot. Autonom. Syst. 54 (10), 779–788 2006.Google Scholar
45.Murotsu, Y., Senda, K., Mitsuya, A., , K. Yamane, Hayashi, M. and Nunohara, T., “Theoretical and Experimental Studies for Continuous Path Control of Flexible Manipulators Mounted on a Free-Flying Space Robot,” Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference, Monterey, CA 1993 pp. 1458–1471.Google Scholar
46.Martin, E., Papadopoulos, E. and Angeles, J., “On the Interaction of Flexible Modes and On-Off Thrusters in Space Robotic Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Pittsburgh, PA 1995 pp. 65–70.Google Scholar
47.Martin, E., Papadopoulos, E. and Angeles, J., “A Control Scheme for the Reduction of Thruster-Manipulator Interaction in Space Robotic Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Victoria, Canada 1998 pp. 1 352–1357.Google Scholar
48.Hu, Y. and Vukovich, G., “Modeling and Control of Free-Flying Flexible Joint Coordinated Robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Monterey, CA 1997 pp. 1013–1020.Google Scholar
49.Talebi, H. A., Patel, R. V. and Asmer, H., “Dynamic Modeling of Flexible-Link Manipulators Using Neural Networks with Application to the SSRMS,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Victoria, Canada 1998 pp. 6 73–678.Google Scholar
50.de Rivals-Mazères, G., Yim, W., Mora-Camino, F. and Singh, S.N., “Inverse control and stabilization of free-flying flexible robots,” Robotica 17 (3), 343–350 1999.Google Scholar
51.Yamano, M., Konno, A., Uchiyama, M. and Miyabe, T., “Capturing a Spinning Object by Two Flexible Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Takamatsu, Japan 2000 pp. 2036–2041.Google Scholar
52.Caron, M., Modi, V. J. and Misra, A. K., “Dynamics of a multimodule variable geometry manipulator,” Acta Astronaut. 50 (10), 587–595 2002.Google Scholar
53.Vafa, Z. and Dubowsky, S., “On the Dynamics of Manipulators in Space Using the Virtual Manipulator Approach,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1987 pp. 579–585.Google Scholar
54.Vafa, Z. and Dubowsky, S., “The kinematics and dynamics of space manipulators: The virtual manipulator approach,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 9 (4), 3–21 1990.Google Scholar
55.Papadopoulos, E. and Dubowsky, S., “On the nature of control algorithms for free-floating space manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 7 (6), 750–758 1991.Google Scholar
56.Umetani, Y. and Yoshida, K., “Continuous path control of space manipulators mounted on OMV,” Acta Astronaut. 15 (12), 981–986 1987.Google Scholar
57.Caccavale, F. and Siciliano, B., “Kinematic control of redundant free-floating robotic systems”, J. Adv. Robot. 15, 429–448 2001.Google Scholar
58.Moosavian, S. Ali A. and Papadopoulos, E., “On the kinematics of multiple manipulator space free-flyers,” J. Robot. Syst. 15 (4), 207–216 1998.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59.Schäfer, B., Krenn, R. and Rebele, B., “On inverse kinematics and kinetics of redundant space manipulator simulation,” J. Comput. Appl. Mech. 4 (1), 53–70 2003.Google Scholar
60.Colbaugh, R., Trabatti, M. and Glass, K., “Redundant nonholonomic mechanical systems: characterization and control,” Robotica 17 (02), 203–217 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61.Moosavian, S. Ali A. and Papadopoulos, E., “Explicit dynamics of space free-flyers with multiple manipulators via SPACEMAPL,” J. Adv. Robot. 18 (2), 223–244 2004.Google Scholar
62.Papadopoulos, E., “Nonholonomic Behaviour in Free-floating Space Manipulators and its Utilization,” In: Nonholonomic Motion Planning 192 (Li, Z. and Canny, J.F., eds.) (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 1993 pp. 423–445.Google Scholar
63.Papadopoulos, E., Poulakakis, I. and Papadimitriou, I., “On path planning and obstacle avoidance for nonholonomic mobile manipulators: A polynomial approach,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 21 (4), 367–383 2002.Google Scholar
64.Ullman, M. and Cannon, R. H., “Experiments in Global Navigation and Control of a Free-Flying Space Robot,” Proceedings of the ASME WAM 15, San Francisco 1989 pp. 37–43.Google Scholar
65.Dubowsky, S. and Torres, M., “Path Planning for Space Manipulators to Minimize Spacecraft Attitude Disturbances,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1991 pp. 2522–2528.Google Scholar
66.Jacobsen, S., Zhu, C., Lee, C. and Dubowsky, S., “Planning of Safe Kinematic Trajectories for Free-Flying Robots Approaching an Uncontrolled Spinning Satellite,” Proceedings of the ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Montreal, Canada Sep. 29–Oct. 2, DETC2002/MECH-34336, 2002.Google Scholar
67.Inaba, N. and Oda, M., “Autonomous Satellite Capture by a Space Robot,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2, San Francisco 2000 pp. 1169–1174.Google Scholar
68.Nakasuka, S. and Fujiwara, T., “New Method of Capturing Tumbling Object in Space and Its Control Aspects,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Kohala Coast, Hawaii Aug. 22–27, 1999 pp. 973–978.Google Scholar
69.Matsumoto, S. et al. , “Satellite Capturing Strategy Using Agile Orbital Servicing Vehicle, Hyper-OSV,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC 2002 pp. 2309–2314.Google Scholar
70.Li, Z., Tarn, T. J. and Bejczy, A., “Dynamic workspace of multiple cooperating robot arms,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 7 (5), 589–596 1991.Google Scholar
71.Zheng, Y. F. and Yin, Q., “Coordinating Multilimbed Robots for Generating Large Cartesian Force,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Cincinnati, OH 1990 pp. 1653–1658.Google Scholar
72.Seraji, H., “Task-based configuration control of redundant manipulators,” J. Robot. Syst. 9 (3), 411–451 1992.Google Scholar
73.Madhani, A. and Dubowsky, S., “The force workspace: A tool for the design and motion planning of multi-limb robotic systems,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 119 (2), 218–225 1997.Google Scholar
74.Papadopoulos, E. and Gonthier, Y., “A framework for large-force task planning of mobile redundant manipulators,” J. Robot. Syst. 16 (3), 151–162 1999.Google Scholar
75.Walker, I. D., “Impact configurations and measures for kinematically redundant and multiple armed robot systems,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 10 (5), 670–683 1994.Google Scholar
76.Yoshida, K., “Impact Dynamics Representation and Control With Extended–Inversed Inertia Tensor for Space Manipulators,” Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Robotics Research, Pittsburgh, PA 1994 pp. 453–463.Google Scholar
77.Yoshida, K., Mavroidis, C. and Dubowsky, S., “Experimental Research on Impact Dynamics of Spaceborne Manipulator Systems,” Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, Stanford, CA Jun. 30–Jul. 2, 1995. [Also published as Experimental Robotics IV, Control and Information Science Series 223 (O. Khatib and J. K. Salisbury eds.) (Springer-Verlag, Germany) pp. 436–447.]Google Scholar
78.Sequeira, J., Lima, P., Ribeiro, M. I. and Sentieiro, J., “Behavior-Based Cooperation With Application to Space Robots,” Proceedings of the 6th ESA Workshop on ASTRA, The Netherlands 2000 pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
79.Xu, Y., “The Measure of Dynamic Coupling of Space Robot Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, GA 1993 pp. 615–620.Google Scholar
80.Nakamura, Y. and Mukherjee, R., “Exploiting nonholonomic redundancy of free-flying space robots,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 9 (4), 499–506 1993.Google Scholar
81.Yamada, K., Yoshikawa, S. and Fujita, Y., “Arm path planning of a space robot with angular momentum,” J. Adv. Robot. 9 (6), 693–709 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82.Nagamatsu, H., Kubota, T. and Nakatani, I., “Capture Strategy for Retrieval of a Tumbling Satellite by a Space Robotic Manipulator,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1996 pp. 70–75.Google Scholar
83.Jaar, G., Cyril, X. and Misra, A. K., “Dynamical Modeling and Control of a Spacecraft-Mounted Manipulator Capturing a Spinning Satellite,” Proceedings of the 43rd Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, IAF-92-0029, 1992.Google Scholar
84.Taniwaki, S., Matunaga, S., Tsurumi, S. and Ohkami, Y., “Coordinated control of a satellite-mounted manipulator with consideration of payload flexibility,” J. Control Eng. Pract. 9, 207–215 2001.Google Scholar
85.Papadopoulos, E. and Moosavian, S. Ali A., “Dynamics and Control of Multi-Arm Space Robots During Chase and Capture Operations,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Munich, Germany 1994 pp. 1554–1561.Google Scholar
86.Papadopoulos, E. and Moosavian, S. Ali A., “A Comparison of Motion Control Algorithms for Space Free-flyers,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Adaptive Structures, Sendai, Japan 1994 pp. 501–516.Google Scholar
87.Papadopoulos, E. and Moosavian, S. Ali A., “Dynamics and control of space free-flyers with multiple arms,” J. Adv. Robot. 9 (6), 603–624 1995.Google Scholar
88.Moosavian, S. Ali A. and Papadopoulos, E., “Control of Space Free-Flyers Using Modified Transpose Jacobian Algorithm,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Grenoble, France 1997 pp. 1500–1505.Google Scholar
89.Moosavian, S. Ali A. and Papadopoulos, E., “Modified Transpose Jacobian control of Robotic systems,” Automatica 2007 to be published.Google Scholar
90.Carter, F. M. and Cherchas, D. B., “Motion control of non-fixed base robotic manipulators,” Robotica 17 (2), 143–157 1999.Google Scholar
91.Umetani, Y. and Yoshida, K., “Resolved motion rate control of space manipulators with generalized Jacobian matrix,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 5 (3), 303–314 1989.Google Scholar
92.Yoshida, K., Kurazume, R. and Umetani, Y., “Dual Arm Coordination in Space Free-Flying Robot,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 1991 pp. 2516–2521.Google Scholar
93.Alexander, H. and Cannon, R., “An extended operational-space control algorithm for satellite manipulators,” J. Astronaut. Sci. 38 (4), 473–486 1990.Google Scholar
94.Fujii, H., Murayama, T., Nakajima, K. and Anazawa, S., “Capture Control for Manipulator Arm of Free-flying Space Robot,” AIAA-90–3432-CP 1990.Google Scholar
95.Yokokohji, Y., Toyoshima, T. and Yoshikawa, T., “Efficient computational algorithms for trajectory control of free-flying space robots with multiple arms,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 9 (5), 571–580 1993.Google Scholar
96.Dubowsky, S. and Papadopoulos, E., “The dynamics and control of space robotic systems,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 9 (5), 531–543 1993.Google Scholar
97.Mukherjee, R. and Chen, D., “Control of free-flying underactuated space manipulators to equilibrium manifolds,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 9 (5), 561–570 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
98.Agrawal, S. K. and Desmier, G., “Models of Assembly Primitives for Free-Floating Robots,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Yokohama, Japan 1993 pp. 2041–2048.Google Scholar
99.Wee, L. B. and Walker, M. W., “On the dynamics of contact between space robots and configuration control for impact minimization,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 9 (5), 581–591 1993.Google Scholar
100.Yoshida, K. and Nenchev, D. N., “Space Robot Impact Analysis and Satellite-Base Impulse Minimization Using Reaction Null-Space,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Japan 1995 pp. 1271–1277.Google Scholar
101.Rutkovsky, V. Yu., Sukhanov, V. M., Glumov, V. M., Zemlyakov, S. D. and Dodds, S. D., “Computer simulation of an adaptive control system for a free-flying space robotic module with flexible payload's transportation,” J. Math. Comput. Simulation 58, 407–421 2002.Google Scholar
102.Swain, A. K. and Morris, A. S., “Dynamic control of multi-arm co-operating manipulator systems,” Robotica 22 (3), 271–283 2004.Google Scholar
103.Moosavian, S. Ali A. and Papadopoulos, E., “On the Control of Space Free-Flyers Using Multiple Impedance Control,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, USA 1997 pp. 853–858.Google Scholar
104.Moosavian, S. Ali A., Rastegari, R. and Papadopoulos, E., “Multiple impedance control for space free-flying robots,” AIAA J. Guid., Control, Dynam. 28 (5), 939–947 2005.Google Scholar
105.Rastegari, R. and Moosavian, S. Ali. A., “Multiple Impedance Control of Space Free-Flying Robots Using Virtual Object Grasp,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China Oct. 9–15, 2006 pp. 3125–3130.Google Scholar
106.Carusone, J., Buchan, K. S. and D'Eleuterio, G. M. T., “Experiments in end-effector tracking control for structurally flexible space manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 9 (5), 553–560 1993.Google Scholar
107.Agrawal, S. K., Hirzinger, G., Landzettel, K. and Schwertassek, R., “A new laboratory simulator for study of motion of free-floating robots relative to space targets,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 12 (4), 627–633 1996.Google Scholar
108.Annapragada, M. and Agrawal, S. K., “Design and experiments on a free-floating planar robot for optimal chase and capture operations in space,” Robot. Autonom. Syst. 26, 281–297 1999.Google Scholar
109.Yoshida, K., “Experimental study on the dynamics and control of a space robot with experimental free-floating robot satellite (EFFORTS) simulators,” J. Adv. Robot. 9 (6), 583–602 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
110.Yoshida, K. and Nakanishi, H., “Impedance Matching in Capturing a Satellite by a Space Robot,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Las Vegas, NV 2003 pp. 3059–3064.Google Scholar
111.Yoshida, K., Nakanishi, H., Ueno, H., Inaba, N., Nishmaki, T. and Oda, M., “Dynamics, control and impedance matching for robotic capture of a non-cooperative satellite,” J. Adv. Robot. 18 (2), 175–198 2004.Google Scholar
112.Dickson, C. and Cannon, R. H., “Experimental Results of Two Free-Flying Robots Capturing and Manipulating a Free-Flying Object,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Pittsburgh, PA 1995 pp. 51–58.Google Scholar
113.Waltz, D. M., On-Orbit Servicing of Space Systems (Krieger, Malabar, FL, 1993.Google Scholar
114.Carignan, C. R. and Akin, D. L., “The reaction stabilization of on-orbit robots,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 20 (6), 19–33 2000.Google Scholar
115.Carignan, C. R., Lane, J. C. and Churchill, P. J., “Controlling robots on-orbit,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation 2001 pp. 314–319.Google Scholar
116.Ellery, A., “Handling Technology for On-Orbit Servicing,” Proceedings of the 1st Bilateral DLR-CSA Workshop on On-Orbit Servicing of Space Infrastructure Elements via Automation and Robotics Technologies, DLR, Cologne, Germany Nov. 25–26, 2002 pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
117.Hirzinger, G., Brunner, B., Lampariello, R., Landzettel, K., Schott, J. and Steinmetz, B.M., “Advances in Orbital Robotics,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA 2000 pp. 898–907.Google Scholar
118.Hirzinger, G., Landzettel, K., Brunner, B., Fischer, M., Preusche, C., Reintsema, D., Albu-Schäffer, A., Schreiber, G. and Steinmetz, B.M., “DLR's robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing,” J. Adv. Robot. 18 (2), 139–174 2004.Google Scholar
119.Borst, C. W. and Volz, R. A., “Telerobotic ground control of a free-flying space camera,” Robotica 18 (4), 361–367 2000.Google Scholar
120.Arena, P., Di Giamberardino, P., Fortuna, L., La Gala, F., Monaco, S., Muscato, G., Rizzo, A. and Ronchini, R., “Toward a mobile autonomous robotic system for Mars exploration,” J. Planet. Space Sci. 52 (1–3), 11–21 2004.Google Scholar