Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T20:53:46.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geometric tools for the off-line programming of robots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

R. K. Stobart
R. K. Stobart
Affiliation:
Cambridge Consultants Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 4DW, (U.K.)
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Off-line programming of robots has a number of clear advantages over traditional ‘teach1’ methods which require the robot to be taken out of production. However, off-line programming techniques require extensive geometric facilities which are ideally provided by a geometric modelling system.

The use of modelling covers the planning of the robot workcell, as well as the detailed planning of the robot operations. Assembly, in particular, requires detailed geometric information concerning geometric features and solid properties.

Keywords

Off-lineProgrammingGeometric ToolsRobots

Information

Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1987, pp. 273 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Jared, G.E.M., “The BUILD geometric modeller” Papers of a Joint Anglo-Hungarian Seminar on Computer-Aided Geometric Design (1983).Google Scholar
2.Cameron, S., “Modelling Solids in Motion” PhD Thesis (University of Edinburgh, 1984).Google Scholar
3.Stobart, R.K., “Collision detection for the off-line programming of robots” Proceedings of the IFIP Working Conference on the Off-line Programming of Industrial Robots.Stuttgart (1986).Google Scholar
4.Lozano-Perez, T., Robot Motion (Brady, et al. , eds.) (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1983).Google Scholar
5.Stobart, R.K. & Dailly, C., “The use of Simulation in the Off-line Programming of Robots’. Proceedings of a Seminar on UK Robotics Research, IEE (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sata, T., Kimura, F., Hiraoka, H., Suzuki, H. & Fujita, T., “Comprehensiv modelling of machine assembly for off-line programming of industrial robots”. Proceedings of the IFIP Working Conference on the Off-line Programming of Industrial Robots,Stuttgart (1986).Google Scholar
7.Wesley, M.A., Lozano-Perez, T., Lieberman, L.I., Lavin, M.S. & Grossman, D.D., “A Geometric Modelling System for Automated Mechanical Assembly” IBMJ. Research and Development 24, No. 1 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ambler, A.P., Corner, D.F. & Popplestone, R.J., “Reasoning about the spatial relationships derived from a RAPT program for describing assembly by robot”. Proceeding of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1983).Google Scholar
9.Jared, G.E.M., “Shape Features in Geometric Modelling” Proceedings of General Motors Research Labs Symposium on Solid Modelling from Theory to Applications (09, 1983).Google Scholar