No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Quadruped Soft Robot for Climbing Parallel Rods
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 July 2020
Summary
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Soft robots can perform effectively inspecting than rigid robots in some special environments such as nuclear pipelines and high-voltage cables. This article presents a versatile quadruped soft rod-climbing robot (SR-CR) that consists of four bending actuators and a telescopic actuator. The bending actuator is composed of flexible bellows with multiple folding air chambers, elastic telescopic layer (ETL), and strain-limiting layer (SLL). The telescopic actuator provides the energy for the robot to climb forward. The SR-CR is activated by a control strategy that alternates the body deformation and feet pneumatic clenched for stable climbing. The robot can climb rods at 90°, with the maximum speed of up to 2.33 mm/s (0.018 body length/s). At 0.83 HZ, the maximum moving speed of the robot in climbing horizontally parallel rods can reach 18.43 mm/s. In addition, the SR-CR can also achieve multiple impressive functions, including turning around a corner at a rate of 7 mm/s (0.054 body length/s), carrying a payload of 3.7 times its self-weight on horizontal rods at a speed of 9 mm/s (0.069 body length/s).
Information
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Footnotes
**
These authors contributed equally to this work.
References
Xu, F., Hu, J. L. and Jiang, G., “The obstacle-negotiation capability of rod-climbing robots and the improved mechanism design,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 29(7), 2975–2986 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, R., Liu, R., Chen, J. and Zhang, J., “A gecko inspired wall-climbing robot based on electrostatic adhesion mechanism,” In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Biomimetics IEEE, Shenzhen, China (2013) pp. 396–401.Google Scholar
Lam, T. L. and Xu, Y., “A flexible tree climbing robot: Treebot-design and implementation,” In: IEEE 300 International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China. (2011) pp. 5849–5854.Google Scholar
Sadeghi, A., Moradi, H. and Nili Ahmadabadi, M., “Analysis, simulation, and implementation of a human-inspired pole climbing robot,” Robotica. 30(2), 279–287 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spenko, M., Haynes, G. C., Saunders, J. A., Cutkosky, M. R., Rizzi, A. A., Full, R. J. and Koditschek, D. E., “Biologically inspired climbing with a hexapedal robot,” J. Field Robot. 25(4–5), 223–242 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, F., Wang, X. and Jiang, G., “Design and analysis of a wall-climbing robot based on a mechanism utilizing hook-like claws,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 261(9), 1–12 (2012).Google Scholar
Tâche, F., Fischer, W., Caprari, G., Siegwart, R., Moser, R. and Mondada, F., “Magnebike: A magnetic wheeled robot with high mobility for inspecting special-shaped structures,” J. Field Robot. 26, 453–476 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, G., Seo, K., Lee, S., Park, J., Kim, H., Kim, J. and Seo, T., “Compliant track-wheeled climbing robot with transitioning ability and high-payload capacity,” In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Karon Beach, Phuket, Thailand (2011) pp. 2020–2024.Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Zong, G., Wang, W. and Liu, R., “Sky Cleaner 3: A real pneumatic climbing robot for glass-wall cleaning,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 13(1), 32–41 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmoud, Tavakoli, Lino, Marques and de Almeida, Aníbal T., “A low-cost approach for self-calibration of climbing robots,” Robotica. 29(1), 23–34 (2011).Google Scholar
Takemori, T., Tanaka, M. and Matsuno, F., “Gait design for a snake robot by connecting curve segments and experimental demonstration,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 34(5), 1384–1391 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zang, H., Liao, B., Lang, X., Zhao, Z., Yuan, W. and Feng, X., “Bionic torus as a self-adaptive soft grasper in robots,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 116(2), 023701-1–023701-3 (2019).Google Scholar
Rus, D. and Tolley, M. T., “Design, fabrication and control of soft robots,” Nature 521(7553), 467–475 (2015).Google ScholarPubMed
Majidi, C., “Soft robotics: A perspective—Current trends and prospects for the future,” Soft Robot. 1(1), 5–11 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laschi, C., Mazzolai, B. and Cianchetti, M., “Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities,” Sci. Robot. 1(1), 3690 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verma, M. S., Ainla, A., Yang, D., Harburg, D. V. and Whitesides, G. M., “A soft tube-climbing robot,” Soft Robot. 5(2), 133–137 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, X. T., Li, K. and Liu, Y. X., “A soft crawling robot driven by single twisted and coiled actuator,” Sensor. Actuat. A Phys. 291(1), 80–86 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Y., Wolf, A. and Gabor, K., “Bi-bellows: Pneumatic bending actuator,” Sensor. Actuat. A Phys. 167(2), 484–494 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, M. T., Shepherd, R. F., Mosadegh, B., Galloway, K. C., Wehner, M., Karpelson, M., Wood, R. J. and Whitesides, G. M., “A resilient, untethered soft robot,” Soft Robot. 1(3), 213–223 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehner, M., Truby, R. L., Fitzgerald, D. J., Mosadegh, B., Whitesides, G. M., Lewis, J. A. and Wood, R. J., “An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots,” Nature. 536(7671), 451–455 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, T. Y., Ge, L. S. and Gu, G. Y., “Programmable design of soft pneu-net actuators with oblique chambers can generate coupled bending and twisting motions,” Sensors Actuat. A Phys. 271, 131–138 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laschi, C., Cianchetti, M., Mazzolai, B., Margheri, L., M. Follador and P Dario, “Soft robot arm inspired by the octopus,” Adv. Robot. 26(7), 709–727 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiao, Z., Ji, C., Zou, J., Yang, H. and Pan, M., “Vacuum-powered soft pneumatic twisting actuators to empower new capabilities for soft robots,” Adv. Mater. Technol. 4(1), 1800429 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Y., Zhang, Q., Lin, G. and Yin, J., “Switchable adhesion actuator for amphibious climbing soft robot,” Soft Robot. 5(5), 592–600 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuk, H., Lin, S., Ma, C., Takaffoli, M., Fang, N. X. and Zhao, X., “Hydraulic hydrogel actuators and robots optically and sonically camouflaged in water,” Nat. Commun. 8(1), 14230 (2017).Google ScholarPubMed
Munadi, M., Ariyanto, M., Setiawan, J. D. and Ayubi, M. F. A., “Development of a low-cost quadrupedal starfish soft robot,” In: IEEE 5th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE), (2018) pp. 225–229.Google Scholar
Gu, G., Zou, J., Zhao, R., Zhao, X. and Zhu, X., “Soft wall-climbing robots,” Sci. Robot. 3, eaat2874 (2018)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, J., Liu, L., Liu, Y. and Leng, J., “Dielectric elastomer spring-roll bending actuators: Applications in soft robotics and design,” Soft Robot. 6(1), 69–81 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prahlad, H., Pelrine, R., Stanford, S., Marlow, J. and Kornbluh, R., “Electroadhesive robots-Wall climbing robots enabled by a novel, robust, and electrically controllable adhesion technology,” In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA (2008) pp. 3028–3033.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, A., Nakashima, T. and Higuchi, T., “Wall climbing mechanisms using electrostatic attraction generated by flexible electrodes,” In: IEEE International Symposium on Micro-Nano Mechatronics and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan (2007) pp. 389–394.Google Scholar
Kalouche, S., Wiltsie, N., Su, H.-J. and Parness, A., “Inchworm style gecko adhesive climbing robot,” In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2014), pp. 2319–2324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unver, O. and Sitti, M., “Flat dry elastomer adhesives as attachment materials for climbing robots,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 26(1), 131–141 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahn, J., Liu, Y., Sadeghi, A. and Menon, C., “A rear feetless timing belt climbing platform utilizing dry adhesives with mushroom caps,” Smart Mater. Struct. 20(11), 115021 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Yamamoto, A. and Higuchi, T., “A crawler climbing robot integrating electroadhesion and electrostatic actuation,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 11(12), 191 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H. and Yamamoto, A., “A thin electroadhesive inchworm climbing robot driven by an electrostatic film actuator for inspection in a narrow gap,” In: IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), Linkoping, Sweden (2013) pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Rogóz, M., Zeng, H., Xuan, C., Wiersma, D. S. and Wasylczyk, P., “Light-driven soft robot mimics caterpillar locomotion in natural scale,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 4(11), 1902–1902 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chihyung, A., Kai, L. and Shengqiang, C., “Light or thermally powered autonomous rolling of an elastomer rod,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 10(30), 25689–25696 (2018).Google Scholar
Lu, H., Zhang, M., Yang, Y., Huang, Q., Fukuda, T., Wang, Z. and Shen, Y., “A bioinspired multilegged soft millirobot that functions in both dry and wet conditions,” Nature. 9(1), 3944 (2018).Google ScholarPubMed
Lin, H., Leisk, G. G. and Trimmer, B., “GoQBot: A caterpillar-inspired soft-bodied rolling robot,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 6(2), 026007 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seok, S., Onal, C. D., Wood, R. J., Rus, D. and Kim, S., “Peristaltic locomotion with antagonistic actuators in soft robotics,” In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Anchorage, Alaska, 2010) pp. 1228–1233.Google Scholar
Nemitz, M. P., Mihaylov, P., Barraclough, T. W., Ross, D. and Stokes, A. A., “Using voice coils to actuate modular soft robots: Wormbot, an example,” Soft Robot. 3(4), 198–204 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, K. M., Chiel, H. J. and Quinn, R. D., “Efficient worm-like locomotion: Slip and control of soft-bodied peristaltic robots,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 3(4), 035003 (2013).Google Scholar
Boxerbaum, A., Horchler, A., Shaw, K., Chiel, H. and Quinn, R., “Worms, waves and robots,” In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA), Saint Paul, MN, USA (2012) pp. 3537–3538.Google Scholar
Boxerbaum, A., Shaw, K. M., Chiel, H. J. and Quinn, R. D., “Continuous wave peristaltic motion in a robot,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 31(3), 302–318 (2012).Google Scholar
Rafsanjani, A., Zhang, Y., Liu, B., Rubinstein, S. M. and Bertold, K., “Kirigami skins make a simple soft actuator crawl,” Sci. Robot. 3(15), aar7555 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, L., Liang, X., Huang, H., Chui, C. K., Yeow, R. C.-H. and Zhu, J., “A versatile soft crawling robot with rapid locomotion,” Soft Robot. 6(4), 455–467 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanada, A., Giardina, F., Howison, T., Mashimo, T. and Iida, F., “Reachability improvement of a climbing robot based on large deformations induced by tri-tube soft actuators,” Soft Robot. 6(4), 483–494 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, B., Zang, H., Chen, M., Wang, Y., Lang, X., Zhu, N., Yang, Z. and Yi, Y., “Soft rod-climbing robot inspired by winding locomotion of snake,” Soft Robot. Ahead of print (2020). DOI: 10.1089/soro.2019.0070
Google Scholar
Zhu et al. supplementary material
Zhu et al. supplementary material
File
51.8 MB
You have
Access
- 23
- Cited by