Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T18:45:00.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A regressor-free adaptive impedance controller for robot manipulators without Slotine and Li's modification: theory and experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2014

Chen-Yu Kai and
An-Chyau Huang
Chen-Yu Kai*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43, Keelung Road, Sec. 4, Taipei 10607, Taiwan, R.O.C.
An-Chyau Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43, Keelung Road, Sec. 4, Taipei 10607, Taiwan, R.O.C.
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: D9603405@mail.ntust.edu.tw
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Slotine and Li's modification is a well-known, simple, and elegant approach for robot adaptive control to avoid the feedback of joint accelerations. This paper presents a simple strategy to implement a regressor-free adaptive impedance controller without using Slotine and Li's modification. In the new strategy, the joint acceleration vector and the dynamics of robot are assumed to be unavailable. Their effects are covered by using the function approximation technique so that there is no need for the joint acceleration feedback. The closed-loop stability and boundedness of internal signals are justified by the Lyapunov-like technique. Experimental results for a two-dimensional (2D) robot are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.

Keywords

Impedance controlAdaptive controlFAT

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , March 2015, pp. 638 - 648
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

References

1.Hogan, N., “Impedance control: An approach to manipulator, Parts I, II, and III,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 107, 1–24 (1985).Google Scholar
2.Lawrence, D. A., “Impedance Control Stability Properties in Common Implementations,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Philadelphia, USA (1988) pp. 1185–1190.Google Scholar
3.Anderson, R. J. and Spong, M. W., “Hybrid impedance control of robotic manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 4 (5), 549–556 (1988).Google Scholar
4.Goldenberg, A. A., “Implementation of Force and Impedance Control in Robot Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Philadelphia, USA (1988) pp. 1626–1632.Google Scholar
5.Zeng, G. and Hemami, A., “An overview of robot force control,” Robotica 15, 473–482 (1997).Google Scholar
6.Jung, S. and Hsia, T. C., “Neural network impedance force control of robot manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 45, 451–461 (1998).Google Scholar
7.Caccade, F., Natale, C., Siciliano, B. and Villani, L., “Six-DOF impedance control based on angle/axis representations,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15, 289–300 (1999).Google Scholar
8.Jung, S., Hsia, T. C. and Bonitz, R. G., “Force tracking impedance control of robot manipulators under unknown environment,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 12 (3), 474–483 (2004).Google Scholar
9.Seifabadi, R., Rezaei, S. M., Ghidary, S. Shiry, Zareinejad, M. and Saadat, M., “To enhance transparency of a piezo-actuated tele-micromanipulator using passive bilateral control,” Robotica 28, 689–703 (2009).Google Scholar
10.Cui, Y. and Sarkar, N., “A unified force control approach to autonomous underwater manipulation,” Robotica 19, 255–266 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Moosavian, S. A. A. and Papadopoulos, E., “Free-flying robots in space: An overview of dynamics modeling, planning and control,” Robotica 25, 537–547 (2007).Google Scholar
12.Xie, Y., Sun, D., Liu, C., Tse, H. Y. and Cheng, S. H., “A force control approach to a robot-assisted cell microinjection system,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 29 (9), 1222–1232 (2010).Google Scholar
13.Schneider, S. A. and Cannon, R. H., “Object impedance control for cooperative manipulation: Theory and experimental results,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 8 (3), 383–394 (1992).Google Scholar
14.Caccavale, F. and Villani, L., “An Impedance Control Strategy for Cooperative Manipulation,” Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Como, Italy (Jul. 8–12, 2001) pp. 343–348.Google Scholar
15.Moosavian, S. A. A. and Papadopoulos, E., “Cooperative object manipulation with contact impact using multiple impedance control,” Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 8 (2), 314–327 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Yoshikawa, T., “Multifingered robot hands: Control for grasping and manipulation,” Annu. Rev. Control 34, 199–208 (2010).Google Scholar
17.Saiki, K., Liza, A. S. R., Toritani, S. and Nonami, K., “Force sensorless impedance control of dual-arm manipulator-hand system,” J. Syst. Des. Dyn. 5 (5), 953–965 (2011).Google Scholar
18.Davliakos, I. and Papadopoulos, E., “Impedance model-based control for an electrohydraulic stewart platform,” Eur. J. Control 5, 1–18 (2009).Google Scholar
19.Fateh, M. M., “Robust impedance control of a hydraulic suspension system,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 20, 858–872 (2010).Google Scholar
20.Slotine, J.-J. E. and Li, W., “Adaptive Strategy in Constrained Manipulation,” Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, North Carolina (1987) pp. 595–601.Google Scholar
21.Slotine, J.-J. E. and Li, W. P. “On the adaptive control of robot manipulators,” Int. J. Robot. 6 (3), 49–59 (1987).Google Scholar
22.Lu, W. S. and Meng, Q. H., “Impedance control with adaptation for robotic manipulations,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 7 (3), 408–415 (1991).Google Scholar
23.Colbaugh, R., Seraji, H. and Glass, K., “Direct Adaptive Impedance Control of Manipulators,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Brighton, UK (Dec. 11–13, 1991) pp. 2410–2415.Google Scholar
24.Wedeward, K. and Colbaugh, R., “New Stability Results for Direct Adaptive Impedance Control,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium, Monterey, California (1995) pp. 281–287.Google Scholar
25.Huang, A. C. and Chien, M. C., Adaptive Control of Robot Manipulators – A Unified Regressor-free Approach (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2010).Google Scholar
26.Huang, A. C. and Kuo, Y. S., “Sliding control of nonlinear systems containing time-varying uncertainties with unknown bounds,” Int. J. Control 74 (3), 252–264 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Huang, A. C. and Chen, Y. C., “Adaptive multiple-surface sliding control for non-autonomous systems with mismatched uncertainties,” Automatica 40, 1939–1945 (2004).Google Scholar
28.Huang, A. C. and Chen, Y. C., “Adaptive sliding control for single-link flexible-joint robot with mismatched uncertainties,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 12 (5), 770–775 (2004).Google Scholar
29.Chen, P. C. and Huang, A. C., “Adaptive sliding control of non-autonomous active suspension systems with time-vary loadings,” J. Sound Vib. 282, 1119–1135 (2005).Google Scholar
30.Tsai, Y. C. and Huang, A. C., “FAT based adaptive control for pneumatic servo system with mismatched uncertainties,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 22 (6), 1263–1273 (2008).Google Scholar
31.Chien, M. C. and Huang, A. C., “Adaptive impedance control of robot manipulators based on function approximation technique,” Robotica 22 (4), 395–403 (2004).Google Scholar
32.Chein, M. C. and Huang, A. C., “Adaptive impedance controller design for flexible-joint electrically-driven robots without computation of the regressor matrix,” Robotica 30, 133–144 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Kai, C. Y. and Huang, A. C., “A regressor-free adaptive controller for robot manipulators without Slotine and Li's modification,” Robotica 31, 1051–1058 (2013).Google Scholar