No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Snap-fit Assembly Process with Industrial Robot Including Force Feedback
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 May 2019
Summary
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
This paper investigates a battery snap-in operation performed by an industrial robot. The snap-fit phenomenon is experienced during the insertion of batteries into the battery holder. In order to understand the nature of the snap-fit phenomenon, the large displacement but small deformation theory is used to model the insertion operation. The stability of equilibrium points is analysed in order to determine the so-called trip point. The purpose of the investigation is to augment the displacement control of the robot with force feedback. A microcontroller-based measurement system is implemented to provide the force feedback. The proposed method is valid for a class of snap-fit problems not only for the investigated specific one.
Information
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
Kshirsagarl, R. M. and Pawar, D. B., “Design and analysis of snap fit joint in plastic part,” Int. J. Innov. Emerg. Res. Eng. 2(1), 83–87 (2015).Google Scholar
Klahn, C., Singer, D. and Meboldt, M., “Design Guidelines for Additive Manufactured Snap-Fit Joints,” In: Procedia CIRP 50, vol. 75 (Elsevier, 2016) pp. 264–269.Google Scholar
Bayer MaterialScience LLC, “Snap-Fit Joints for Plastics – A Design Guide,” (Bayer Polycarbonates Business Unit, Pittsburg, PA, 1998).Google Scholar
Bader, B. and Koch, R., “Numerical simulation (FEM) of snap-in and snap-out processes of ball snap-fits,” Comput. Mater. Sci. 3, 125–134 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, F., “Assembly processes with robotic systems,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 19, 151–166 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, M. A.,“What is Haptics. Laboratory for Human and Machine Haptics,” (Laboratory for Human and Machine Haptics: The Touch Lab, MIT, 2005) pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Homberg, B. S., Katzschmann, R. K., Dogar, M. R. and Rus, D., “Haptic Identification of Objects using a Modular Soft Robotic Gripper,” In: IROS (2015) pp. 1698–1705.Google Scholar
Gohil, V. J., Bhagwat, S. D., Raut, A. P. and Nirmal, P. R., “Robotics arm control using haptic technology,” Int. J. Latest Res. Sci. Technol. 2, 98–102 (2013).Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Jia, J., He, X. and Wang, H., “Post-buckling and snap-through behavior of inclined slender beams,” J. Appl. Mech. 75, 041020-1–041020-7 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riks, E., “An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems,” Int. J. Solids Struct. 15(7), 529–551 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisfield, M. A., Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, 1991).Google Scholar
Vahidi, M., Jafari, V., Abyaneh, M. H. and Vahdani, S. H., “Displacement field approximations for force-based elements in large displacement analyses,” J. Appl. Math. 1–11 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouche, N., Habets, P. and Laloy, M., Stability Theory by Liapumovs Direct Method (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Souza, R. M., “Force-based finite element for large displacement inelastic analysis of frames,” [Dissertation] (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2000).Google Scholar
Bathe, K. J., Finite Element Procedures (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996).Google Scholar
Andersson, S., Söderberg, A. and Björklund, S., “Friction models for sliding dry, boundary and mixed lubricated contacts,” Tribol. Int. 580–587 (2005).Google Scholar
Spong, M. W., Hutchinson, S. and Vidyasagar, M., Robot Modeling and Control (John Wiley and Sons Inc., USA, 2006).Google Scholar
You have
Access
- 10
- Cited by