Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:49:22.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New Science and the Public Sphere in the Premodern Era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Jan C.C. Rupp
Jan C.C. Rupp
Affiliation:
Amsterdam School for Social Science Research University of Amsterdam
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that the New Science, which was seen as essentially a public enterprise, was moreover a major constituent of the public sphere in early modern era. In seventeenth-and eighteenth-century Western Europe the sphere of public experimentation, testing, and discussion related to the new science, manifested, itself as a highly diversified, contested, and complex social field.

Two general problems arose in constructing this cultural public sphere: the selection of participants in the debate and the inclusion of a heterogenous public in the experimental scene. National authorities employed diverse policies but none denied the necessity of public debate for testing the validity of experimentations. The public sphere had to create its own conditions of existence by imposing manifold regulations in order to make these public meetings possible and enjoyable. These regulations emphasized common interest and the moral code as the most basic condition for rhe sustenance of the public sphere, thus enhancing self-restraint, tolerance, and politeness on the part of both discussants and participants. The more inclusive and heterogenous the public sphere, the more these norms were required. Thus the sphere of public debate constituted by early modern science implied a civilizing process, quite different from and more encompassing than the one analyzed by Norbert Elias

Information

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1995, pp. 487 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agnew, Jean-Christophe, 1986. Worlds Apart: The Market and the Theater in Anglo-American Thought, 1650–1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Keith Michael. 1992. “Defining the Public Sphere, in Eighteenth-Century France“ In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Calhoun, Craig, 181–211. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Balfoort, Dirk J. 1938. Het muziekleven in Nederland in de 17de en 18de eeuw. Amsterdam: Van Kampen.Google Scholar
Bates, Donald G. 1977. “Sydenham and the Medical Meaning of ‘Method’.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 51: 324–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1985. “On the Origins of Civilization: A Historical Note.” Theory, Culture and Society 2:7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas Hall, Marie, 1991. Promoting Experimental Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, John, and John, Styles, eds. 1980. An Ungovernable People: The English and Their Law in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Dewurst, Kenneth. 1958. “Locke and Sydenham on the Teaching of Anatomy.” Medical History 2, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul. 1982. “Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-Century Boston.” Media, Culture and Society 4:33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drélincourt, Carel. 1672. Experimenta Anatomica, ex vivorum sectionibus petita Leiden.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., [1893] 1964. The Division of Labour in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. [1939. 1978. The Civilizing Process. Vol. 1: The History of Manners. Vol. 2: State Formation and Civilization Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert 1983. The Court Society.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Giovanni. 1987. “Public Anatomy Lessons and the Carnival: The Anatomy Theatre of Bologna.” Past and Present 117: 50–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1929] 1982. Civilizations and Its Discontents. Revised and newly edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Golinski, Jan. 1992. Science as Public Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goudsblom, Johan. 1987. De Sociologie van Norbert Elias. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.Google Scholar
Green, Philip. ed. 1993. Democracy. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Groenhuis, G. 1977. De Predikanten: De sociale posite van de gereformeerde predikanten in de Republiek der Verenigde Nederlanden voor 1700. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. [1962] 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press. Originally published as Structurwandlung der Oeffentlickhkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der Bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, Neuwied-Berlin: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1974. “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article.” New German Critique, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckscher, W. S. 1958. Rembrandt's Anatomy of Dr. Nicolaas Tulp: An Iconological Study. New York. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Heilbron, John. 1982. Elements of Early Modern Physics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Christopher. 1991. Change and Continuity in Seventeenth-Century England. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kant's Political Writings. 1990. Edited with an introduction and notes by Reiss, Hans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kilminster, Richard. 1991. “Evaluating Elias.” Theory, Culture and Society 8: 165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Christopher. 1979. “The Nervous System and Society in the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, edited by Barnes, Barry and Shapin, Steven, 19–40. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Christopher 1988. “Alexander Monro Primus and the Edinburgh Manner of Anatomy.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 62: 193–214.Google Scholar
Levine, Lawrence W. 1988. Highbrow Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindeboom, Gerrit. 1975. “Dog and Frog: Physiological Experiments at Leiden during the Seventeenth Century.” In Leiden University in the Seventeenth Century, edited by Scheurleer, T. H. Lunsingh and Meyjes, G. H. M. Posthumus, 179–293. Leiden: Universitaire Pers Leiden.Google Scholar
Linebaugh, Peter. 1975. “The Tyburn Riot against the Surgeons.” In Albion's Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth-Century England, edited by Hay, Douglas et al. , 65–117. London: Allan Lane.Google Scholar
Mennell, Stephen. 1989. Norbert Elias: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mijnhardt, W. W. 1992. Over de consumptie van cultuur (On the consumption of culture). RU Utrecht.Google Scholar
Money, John. 1993. “Teaching in the Market Place, or ‘Caesar, adsum jam forte: Pompey aderat’: The Retailing of Knowledge in Provincial England during the Eighteenth Century.” In Consumption and the World of Goods, edited by Brewer, John and Porter, Roy, 335–80. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Nicholas T. 1981. “The Scottish Enlightenment.” In The Englightenment in National Context, edited by Porter, Roy and Teich, Nicolas, 19–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Roy. 1980. “Science, Provincial Culture and Public Opinion in Enlightenment England.” British Journal of Eighteenth Century Studies 111: 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Ruth. 1987. Death, Dissection and the estitute. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rupp, Jan C.C. 1990. “Matters of Life and Death: The Social and Cultural Conditions of the Rise of Anatomical Theaters, with Special Reference to Seventeenth Century Netherlands.” History of Science 28: 263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupp, Jan C.C. 1992. “Michel Foucault, Body Politics and the Rise and Expansion of Modern Anatomy.” Journal of Historical Sociology 5: 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 1983. “Natural Philosophy and Public Spectacle in the Eighteenth Century.” History of Science 21: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffer, Simon 1993. “The Consuming Flame: Electrical Showmen and Tory Mystics in the World of Goods.” In Consumption and the World of Goods, edited by Brewer, John and Porter, Roy, 489–554. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheurleer, D. F. 1909. Het muziekleven in Nederland in de tweede helft der 18e eeuw in verband met Mozart's verblijf aldaar. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa. 1989. The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schotel, G. D. J. 1871. Geschiedenis der Rederijkers in Nederland. 2 vols. Rotterdam: J. H. Dunk.Google Scholar
Schotel, G. D. J. 1906. De openbare eeredienst der Nederlands Hervormde Kerk in de zestiende, zeventiende en achttiende eeuw. Leiden: Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1974. “The Audience for Science in Eighteenth-Century Edinburgh.” History of Science 12: 95–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapin, Steven 1988. “The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England.” ISIS 79: 373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1991. “‘A Scholar and a gentlemen’: The Problematic Identity of the Scientific Practitioner in Early Modern England.” History of Science 29: 279–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Stevan, and Simon, Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dennis. 1991. The Rise of Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Snelders, H. A. M. 1983. “De natuurwetenschappen in de lokale wetenschappelijke genootschappen uit de eerste helft van de negentiende eeuw.” De Negentiende Eeuw 17: 102–21.Google Scholar
Sprat, Thomas, 1667. History of the Royal Society. London.Google Scholar
Stewart, Larry. 1992. The Rise of Public Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Hardvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ure, Andrew. 1818. “An Account of Some Experiments Made on the Body of a Criminal Immediately after Execution, with Psysiological and Practical Observation.” Journal of Sciences and the Arts: 283–94.Google Scholar
Van, Deursen J.C. 1974. Bavianen en Slijgeuzen: Kerk en kerkvolk ten tijde van Maurits en Oldebarnevelt. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Van, Deursen J.C. 1991. Plain Lives in a Golden Age: Popular Culture, Religion and Society in Seventeenth-Century Holland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Schaik, A. H. M. 1989. Honderd jaar Utrechters en hun muziekleven. Utrecht: Waanders.Google Scholar
Wolfe, David E. 1961. “Sydenham and Locke on the Limits of Anatomy.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 35: 193–220.Google ScholarPubMed
Wood, Paul. 1993. “Science, the Universities, and the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century Scotland.” Paper presented at the History of University Conference, Aberdeen, 3–5 July 1993.Google Scholar