Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T16:28:02.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Witches' Sabbath: The First International Solvay Congress in Physics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Diana Kormos Barkan
Diana Kormos Barkan
Affiliation:
School of Social Science, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is about the context of Albert Einstein's concerns at the time of a most intense intellectual effort — his own and that of a small group of scientists concerned with classical quantum theory. I describe contemporaneous interactions and differing views about the prospects for and the significance of the First Solvay Congress of 1911 as voiced by major participants. There are two axes around which the paper evolves: the Einstein-Nernst-Lorentz dialogue and the public institutional creation of the “Solvay” stage. In certain ways, this paper is about personal and institutional patronage: the working out of a difficult theoretical impasse requires individual and collective moral support. It is about the forging of the identity of a scientific problem and the personal and institutional setting, the public space, in which this problem was collectively addressed. But I also uncover heuristic playfulness and flexibility which accompanies theoretical change.

Information

Type
The Context of Reception
Information
Science in Context , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , Spring 1993, pp. 59 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cigonetti, Claudio. 1987. “L'alleanza Planck-Nernst” in Rappresentazione e oggeto dalla fisica alle altre scienze, edited by la Forgia, M. and Petruciolli, S.. Rome and Napoli: Edizioni Theoria.Google Scholar
de Broglie, Maurice. 1951. Les Premiers Congrès de Physique Solvay et l'Orientation de la Physique depuis 1911. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. [1909] 1989. “Zum gegenwärtigen Stand des Strahlungspro blems.” Phys. Z. 10:185–93. Reprinted in The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 2, The Swiss Years: Writings 1900–1909, edited by John Stachel et al.Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Einstein, Albert. 1914. “Zum gegenwärtigen Stande des Problems der spezifischen Wärme.” In Eucken 1914, 330–52.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert and Hopf, L.. 1910. “Statistische Untersuchung der Bewegung eines Resonators in einem Strahlungsfeld,” Ann. d. Physik 33: 1105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein-Besso Correspondence. See Speziali 1972.Google Scholar
Eucken, A., ed. 1914. Die Theorie der S:rahlung undder Quanten. Verhandlunngen auf einer von E. Solvay einberufenen Zusammenkunft (30. Oktober bis 3. November 1911). Halle a.S: Wilhelm KnappGoogle Scholar
Eve, A. S. 1939. Rutherford, Being the Life and Letters of the Rt Hon. Lord Rutherford, O.M., with a foreword by Earl Baldwin of Bewdley. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fischer, Emil. n.d. “Festmahl zu Ehren der Herren E. Solvay und H. von Bottinger am 1. Juli 1909 im Kaiserlichen Automobilkiub zu Berlin.” Pamphlet.Google Scholar
Fischer, Emil. n.d. 1922. Aus meinem Leben. Edited with a Foreword by Bergman, M.. Berlin: Julius Springer.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 1987. How Experiments End. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gavroglu, Kostas. 1990. “The Reaction of the British Physicists and Chemists to van der Waals' Early Work and to the Law of Corresponding States.” HSPS 20: 199–237.Google Scholar
Heilbron, J. L. and Kuhn, T. S.. 1969. “The Genesis of the Bohr Atom.” HSPS 1: 211–90.Google Scholar
Hermann, A. 1971. The Genesis of the Quantum Theory, trans. C. W. Nash. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Kant, H. 1974. “Zum Problem der Forschungsprofihierung am Beispiel der Nernstschen Schule während ihrer Berliner Zeit von 1905 bis 1914.” NTM Schriftenr Gesch. Naturwiss., Technik, Med., Leipzig 11. 2:58–68.Google Scholar
Kant, H. 1966. “Thermodynamics and Quanta in Planck's Work.” Physics Today 19(11):23–32.Google Scholar
Kant, H. 1970. Paul Ehrenfest. Vol. 1. The Making of a Theoretical Physicist. Amsterdam and London: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Klein, M. 1965. “Einstein, Specific Heats, and the Early Quantum Theory.” Science in Context 148: 173–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Kohnstamm, P. and Ornstein, L. S.. 1910. “On Nernst's Theorem of Heat.” Proceedings Royal Academy Amsterdam 13:700–715.Google Scholar
Kormos, Barkan Diana. 1990. “Walther Nernst and the Transition to Modern Physical Chemistry.” Ph.D. diss. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
Kox, A. J. 1993. “Einstein and Lorentz: More than Just Good Colleagues.” Science in Context 6 (1): 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1978. Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity 1894–1912. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langevin, Paul and Broglie, Maurice de, eds. 1912. La théorie du rayonnement et les quanta. Paris: Gauthier.Google Scholar
McCormmach, R. 1967. “Henri Poincaré and the Quantum Theory.” Isis 58:37–55.Google Scholar
Jungnickel, Christa, and McCormmach, R.. 1986. Intellectual Mastery of Nature, vol. 2. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mehra, J. 1975. The Solvay Conference on Physics. Aspects of the Development of Physics since 1911, foreword by W. Heisenberg. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nernst, W. 1903. “Über Molekulargewichts-Bestimmungen bei sehr hohen Temperaturen.” Z. f. Elektrochem. 32: 622–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nernst, W. 1911a. “Sur la détermination de l'affinité chimique á partir de données thermiques,” Journal de chimie physique 8: 228–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nernst, W. 1911b. “On the Inconsistency of My Heat Theorem and van der Waals' Equation at Very Low Temperatures.” Proceedings RoyalAcademy Amsterdam 14: 201–4.Google Scholar
Pais, A. 1982. “Subtle is the Lord… ”The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paul Langevin Papers n.d. Paris: éco1e Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, Jean. n.d. Hislorique des Instituts Internationaux de Physique et de Chimie Solvay, microfilm. New York: Archives for the History of Quantum Physics, American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. 1911. “Sur la théorie des quanta.” Comptes rendus 153: 1103–8.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. 1912. “Sur la théorie des quanta.” Journal de Physique 2:5–34.Google Scholar
Prelli, J. Lawrence, 1989. A Rhetoric of Science: Inviting Scientjfic Discourse. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
Prelli, J. Lawrence and Gross, Alan G.. 1990. The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Registre contenant des pièces manuscrites concernant les premiers Congrès de Physique Solvay offert aàl'Académie des Sciences en la séance du 19 Décembre 1951 par de Brogue M. Maurice, 2 vols. Paris: Archives de l'Institut de France.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Léon. 1936. “La premiere phase de l'évolution de la Théorie des Quanta.” Osiris 2: 149—96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seelig, Carl. 1956. Albert Einstein: Eine dokumentarische Biographie. Zurich: Europa Verlag.Google Scholar
Smith, F. W. F. 1962. The Professor and the Prime Minister. Boston: Riverside Press Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Speziali, , Pierre, , ed. 1972. Albert Einstein / Michele Besso. Correspondance, 1903–1955. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
La structure de la matière, Rapports et discussions du Conseil de Physique tenu a Bruxelles du 27 au 31 Octobre 1913. 1921. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar