Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T01:17:21.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to Roundtable

The U.S. Congress in the Twentieth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Julian E. Zelizer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The claim that contemporary historical scholarship has ignored the twentieth-century U.S. Congress is a great understatement. During the past two decades, most social and cultural historians minimized the study of government institutions, policy makers, and policies. They characterized these aspects of American history as elitist, irrelevant, and even illegitimate (Leff 1995; Leuchtenburg 1986).The ultimate villain in this scholarly narrative was Congress, considered to be an insulated haven for white male elites who sub-vert the democratic process in favor of vested interest groups.When Congress appeared in a few academic books, it was treated as an archaic institution that functions as either a road block or a rubber stamp to proposals that emanate from the executive branch or from mass social movements.Those interested in the modern history of Congress can turn only to the work of journalists such as John Jacobs (1995) and Richard Cohen (1999) who rely on political biography in attempts to understand the institution’s past.

Information

Type
Roundtable: The U.S. Congress in the Twentieth Century
Information
Social Science History , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , summer 2000 , pp. 307 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bacon, Donald, and Davidson, Roger, and Keller, Morton (eds.) (1994) The Encyclopedia of the United States Congress. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Balogh, Brian (1991) “Reorganizing the organizational synthesis: Federal-professional relations in modern America.” Studies in American Political Development 5: 119–72.Google Scholar
Balogh, Brian (1999) “‘Mirrors of desires’: Interest groups, elections, and the targeted style between the world wars.” Paper presented at the Organization of American Historians convention 1999. Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, >Bryan D. (1993)Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Bryan+D.+(1993)Agendas+and+Instability+in+American+Politics.+Chicago:+University+of+Chicago+Press.>Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah (1997) Minority Rights, Majority Rules: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinkley, Alan (1995) The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Cohen, Richard E. (1999) Rostenkowski: The Pursuit of Power and the End of the Old Politics. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar
Davies, Gareth, and Derthick, Martha (1997) “Race and social welfare policy: The Social Security Act of 1935.” Political Science Quarterly 112: 217–35.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis (1970) “The Emerging Organizational Synthesis in Modern American History.” Business History Review 44: 279–90.Google Scholar
Galambos, Louis (1983) “Technology, Political Economy, and Professionalization.” Business History Review 57: 471–93.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda (1994) Pitied but Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare, 1890-1935. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Hugh Davis (1990) The Civil Rights Era: Origins and Development of National Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, Robert (1970) The Politics of Fear: Joseph R. McCarthy and the Senate. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Christopher (1997) The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, John (1995) A Rage for Justice: The Passion and Politics of Phillip Burton. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert David (1998-99) “The Government Operations Committee and foreign policy during the Cold War.” Political Science Quarterly 113: 645–71.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Kolko, Gabriel (1985) The Triumph of Conservatism: A Re-interpretation of American History, 1900-1916. Reissue edition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Leff, Mark H. (1995) “Revisioning U.S. political history.” American Historical Review 100: 829–53.Google Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William M. (1963) Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William M. (1986) “The pertinence of political history: Reflections on the significance of the state in America.” Journal of American History 73: 585–600.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert (1998) Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Patashnik, Eric (forthcoming) Putting Trust in the U.S. Budget: Federal Trust Funds and the Politics of Commitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, James T. (1967) Congressional Conservatism and the New Deal: The Growth of the Conservative Coalition in Congress, 1933-1939. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. (1984) Political Innovation in America: The Politics of Policy Innovation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Quadagno, Jill (1998) The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr. (1959) The Age of Roosevelt: The Coming of the New Deal. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Silbey, Joel (ed.) (1994) Encyclopedia of the American Legislative System: Studies of the Principal Structures, Processes, and Policies of Congress and State Legislators since the Colonial Era. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Steven (1982) Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sklar, Martin J. (1988) The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism, 1890–1916: The Market, the Law, and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S., and Deering, Christopher J. (1990).Committees in Congress. 2d ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Sorenson, Theodore (1965) Kennedy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Thurber, Timothy N. (1999) The Politics of Equality: Hubert H. Humphrey and the African American Freedom Struggle. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
White, Joseph, and Wildavsky, Aaron (1989) The Deficit and the Public Interest: The Search for Responsible Budgeting in the 1980s. Berkeley: University of California Press; New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Julian E. (1996) “Learning the ways and means: Wilbur Mills and a fiscal community, 1954-1964,” in Brownlee W. Elliot (ed.) Funding the Modern American State, 1941–1995: The Rise and Fall of the Era of Easy Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 289–352.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Julian E. (1998) Taxing America: Wilbur D. Mills, Congress, and the State, 1945–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar