Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T17:30:54.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalization and Transnational Labor Organizing

The Honduran Maquiladora Industry and the Kimi Campaign

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Ralph Armbruster-Sandoval
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The proliferation of garment industry sweatshops over the past 20 years has generated numerous cross-border (transnational) organizing campaigns involving U.S., Mexican, and Central American labor unions and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). This article examines one such campaign that took place at the Honduran maquiladora factory known as Kimi. The Kimi workers (along with their transnational allies) struggled for six years before they were legally recognized as a union, and they negotiated one of the few collective bargaining agreements in the entire Central American region. The factory eventually shut down, however. Based on Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink's “boomerang effect” model, this case study analyzes why these positive and negative outcomes occurred. It concludes with some observations about “the enemy” and offers short-, medium-, and long-term suggestions for the broader antisweatshop movement.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 27 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Labor Internationalism , Winter 2003, pp. 551 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aguilar, Efraín (1999) Author interview with CUTH secretary of organization, San Pedro Sula, Honduras, 14 September.Google Scholar
Aguillón, Sara (1999) Author interview with SITRAKIMIH general-secretary, La Lima, Honduras, 28-29 September.Google Scholar
Alexander, Robin, and Gilmore, Peter (1994) “The emergence of cross-border labor solidarity.” NACLA: Report on the Americas 28 (1): 42–48.Google Scholar
Anner, Mark (1998) “Transnational campaigns to defend labor rights in export processing plants in El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, and Haiti.” Paper presented at the Latin American Studies Association Twenty-first International Congress, Chicago, 24-26 September Google Scholar
Armbruster, Ralph (1995) “Cross-national labor organizing strategies.” Critical Sociology 21 (2): 75–89.Google Scholar
Armbruster, Ralph (1998a) “Globalization and cross-border labor organizing in the automobile and garment industries.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
Armbruster, Ralph (1998b) “Cross-border labor organizing in the garment and automobile industries: The Phillips Van-Heusen and Ford Cuautitlán cases.” Journal of World-Systems Research 4:20–51.Google Scholar
Armbruster-Sandoval, Ralph (1999) “Globalization and cross-border labor organizing: The Guatemalan maquiladora industry and the Phillips Van-Heusen case.” Latin American Perspectives 26 (2): 108–28.Google Scholar
Armbruster-Sandoval, Ralph (2000) “Globalization and cross-border labor organizing in the Americas: The Phillips Van-Heusen campaign, the Battle in Seattle, and beyond.” Paper presented at the Latin American Studies Association Twenty-second International Congress, Miami, FL, 16-18 March. Google Scholar
Armbruster-Sandoval, Ralph (1999) “Globalization and cross-border labor organizing: The anti-sweatshop movement and the struggle for social justice.” Unpublished book manuscript.Google Scholar
Barry, Tom, and Norsworthy, Kent (1990) Honduras: A Country Guide. Albuquerque, NM: Resource Center.Google Scholar
Bilbao, Jon (1999) “La fabrica y el sindicato SITRAKIMIH.” Unpublished paper on file with author.Google Scholar
Bircham, Emma, and Charlton, John, eds. (2001) Anti-capitalism: A Guide to the Movement. London: Bookmarks.Google Scholar
Boyer, Jeff, and Pell, Aaron (1999) “Mitch in Honduras: A disaster waiting to happen.” NACLA: Report on the Americas 33 (2): 36–41.Google Scholar
Buhle, Paul (1999) Taking Care of Business. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Campaign for Labor Rights (CLR) (1999) “Honduras: Kimi victory (for now).” CLR Action Alert, 4 September.Google Scholar
Campaign for Labor Rights (CLR) (2000) “Honduras: Kimi cuts and runs.” CLR Action Alert, 25 May.Google Scholar
Ching Yoon Louie, Miriam (2001) Sweatshop Warriors. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
Cisneros, David (1999) Author interview with CTH-FESITRAINCOH assistant general-secretary, San Pedro Sula, Honduras, 12 September.Google Scholar
Coats, Steve (2000) Author interview (by phone) with U.S./LEAP executive director, 12 September.Google Scholar
Coats, Steve (2002) “Central American labor solidarity: Lessons for activists?” in Prokosch, Mike and Raymond, Laura (eds.)The Global Activists Manual. New York: Thunder Mouth/Nation:199–208.Google Scholar
del Cid, Nelly (1999) Author interview. El Progreso, Honduras, 21 September.Google Scholar
del Cid, Nelly, Castro, Carla, and Rodríguez, Yadira (1999) “Trabajadoras de la Maquila: ¿Nuevo perfil de mujer?” Envío (September):35–41.Google Scholar
Dorman, Peter (1989) “Worker rights and U.S. trade policy: An evaluation of worker rights conditionality under the Generalized System of Preferences.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
EMI (1998) “Ponencia sobre experiencias y reflexiones del equipo de Monitoreo Independiente en la Empresa Kimi de Honduras.” Paper presented at Primer Encuentro Sobre Monitoreo Independiente en las Maquilas, San Salvador, El Salvador, 12-15 January. Google Scholar
Euraque, Dario (1996) Reinterpreting the Banana Republic: Region and State in Honduras, 1870-1972. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Featherstone, Liza (2001) “Reply to critics.” Dissent (fall):109–11.Google Scholar
Fieldman, Bruce (1999) Author interview with FITTIV representative, San Pedro Sula, Honduras, 24 September.Google Scholar
Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Foundation (1998) Las Maquilas en Honduras y Monitoreo Independiente en Central America. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Frundt, Henry (1996) “Trade and cross-border labor strategies in the Americas.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 17 (3): 387–417.Google Scholar
Frundt, Henry (1999) “Cross-border organizing in apparel: Lessons from the Caribbean and Central America.” Labor Studies Journal 24 (1): 89–106.Google Scholar
Frundt, Henry (2002) “Four models of cross-border maquila organizing,” in Nissen, Bruce (ed.) Unions in a Globalized Environment. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe:45–75.Google Scholar
Harvey, David (1982) Limits to Capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Harvey, David (2000) Spaces of Hope. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Dale (2000) Allies across the Border: Mexico's Authentic Front and Global Solidarity. Boston: South End.Google Scholar
Herod, Andrew (2001) Labor Geographies: Workers and the Landscape of Capitalism. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Honduran Apparel Manufacturers Association (HAMA) (1999) Apparel Industry in Honduras. San Pedro Sula, Honduras: HAMA.Google Scholar
Howard, Alan (1999) “Why unions can't support the apparel industry sweatshop code.” Working USA (May-June): 34–50.Google Scholar
Howard, Alan (2000) Author interview (by phone) with assistant to the president of UNITE, 16 August.Google Scholar
International Labor Organization (ILO) (1999) ¿Que Ha Pasado con La Maquila? Actualización del Estudio Sobre la Situación en las Empresas Maquiladoras del Istmo Centroaméricano y República Dominicana. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey (2001) “A proposal for modesty.” Dissent (fall):100–9.Google Scholar
Johns, Rebecca (1998) “Bridging the gap between class and space: U.S. worker solidarity with Guatemala.” Economic Geography 74 (3): 252–71.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kernaghan, Charlie (1999a) “An open letter to university students concerning the apparel industry partnership and Nike.” Letter posted on the National Labor Committee Web site at www.nlcnet.org/student/openlet.htm, 16 March (no longer available).Google Scholar
Kernaghan, Charlie (1999b) Author interview with NLC executive director, San Salvador, El Salvador, 22 August.Google Scholar
Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James V., and Sikkink, Kathryn (2001) “From Santiago to Seattle: Transnational advocacy groups restructuring world politics” in Khagram, , Riker, , and Sikkink, (eds.) Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press:3–23.Google Scholar
Krupat, Kitty (1997) “From war zone to Free Trade Zone: A history of the National Labor Committee,” in Ross, Andrew (ed.) No Sweat. London: Verso:51–78.Google Scholar
Krupat, Kitty (2002) “Rethinking the sweatshop: A conversation about USAS with Charles Eaton, Marion Traub-Werner, and Evelyn Zepada.” International Labor and Working-Class History 61: 112–27.Google Scholar
Maldonado, Hugo (1999) Author interview with CODEH director, San Pedro Sula, Honduras, 16 September.Google Scholar
Moberg, David (1998) “Lessons from the victory at Phillips Van-Heusen.” WorkingUSA (May-June):39–50.Google Scholar
Paredes, Maritza (1999) Author interview with CODEMUH director, San Pedro Sula, Honduras, 28 September.Google Scholar
Pattee, Jon (1996) “‘Gapatistas’ win a victory.” Labor Research Review 24: 77–85.Google Scholar
Posas, Mario (2000) Diagnostico del Movimiento Sindical Hondureño. Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Ricker, Tom, and Wimberley, Dale (2003) “Global networking in the twenty-first century: Labor rights movements and Nicaragua's maquilas,” in Dunaway, Wilma A. (ed.) Crises and Resistance in the Twenty-first Century World-System. Vol. 1 of Emerging Issues in the Twenty-First Century World-System. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Rivera, Herbert (1999) “Chocan huelgistas y policia en Toma Parque Industrial.” La Prensa, 31 August.Google Scholar
Salinas, Israel (1999) Author interview with CUTH general-secretary, San Pedro Sula, Honduras, 23 September.Google Scholar
Schalit, Joel, ed. (2002) The Anti-Capitalism Reader: Imagining a Geography of Opposition. New York: Akashic.Google Scholar
Schulz, Donald, and Sundolff Schulz, Deborah (1994) The United States, Honduras, and the Crisis in Central America. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Starr, Amory (2000) Naming the Enemy:Anti-corporate Movements Confront Globalization. London: Zed.Google Scholar
Su, Julie (1997) “El Monte Thai garment workers: Slave sweatshops.” No Sweat:143–49.Google Scholar
Support Team International for Textileras (STITCH) and the Maquila Solidarity Network (MSN) (2000) Behind the Labels: Testimonios from Central America. Chicago and Toronto: STITCH and MSN.Google Scholar
U.S./LEAP (2000) “Kimi still closed in Honduras.” U.S./LEAP Newsletter, December: 7.Google Scholar
U.S. State Department (2000) Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 1999: Honduras. Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 25 February.Google Scholar
Valladares, Efraín Moncada (1995) Los dos caras de la maquila en Honduras. Documentos de Trabajo, No. 10. Tegucigalpa: Universidad Nacional Autónoma Honduras.Google Scholar
Weiss, Larry (1997) “Sweatshop task force fuels controversy.” Working Together, May-June:1–2.Google Scholar
Williams, Heather (1999) “Mobile capital and transborder labor rights mobilization.” Politics and Society 27 (1): 139–66.Google Scholar
Working Together (1999) “Workers win contract at Honduran maquila, but union's victory under threat.” Working Together, May-June: 3.Google Scholar