Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T19:25:44.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resuscitating Class

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Sonya O. Rose
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A sense of crisis and uncertainty seems pervasive among many social historians and historical sociologists who have studied the relationship between economic disadvantage and protest politics. Within the last five or so years, edited volumes and special issues of journals have encouraged scholars to “bring class back in,” to explore what some worry is the “end of labor history,” or to “rethink working-class history” in the wake of postmodernism, the turn to discursive and cultural analysis, and the growing number of scholars whose substantive interests involve issues of race and gender.

Even those who celebrate the rich diversity of subject matters explored by contemporary labor and working-class historians are worried about scholars jumping ship because “engaged history, in possession at least of the conceit of making a difference, has moved elsewhere, to other subject areas,” to quote Ira Katznelson (1994: 7). I myself have chosen to take a “leave of absence” from studying the mutual constitution of gender and class.

Information

Type
A Roundtable on Gender, Race, Class, Culture, and Politics: Where Do We Go from Here?
Information
Social Science History , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , Spring 1998, pp. 19 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berlanstein, Lenard (1993) Introduction to Lenard Berlanstein (ed.) Rethinking Labor History. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Elsa Barkley (1994) “Negotiating and transforming the public sphere: African American political life in the transition from slavery to freedom.” Public Culture 7: 107–46.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. (1983) Which Way Is Up?: Essays on Class, Sex and Culture. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eley, Geoff (1994) “Cultural socialism, the public sphere, and the mass form: Popular culture and the democratic project, 1900–1924.” Paper presented to the conference “Past and present: The challenge of E. P. Thompson,” Princeton University, April.Google Scholar
Eley, Geoff, and Nield, Keith (1995) “Starting over: The present, the post-modern, and the moment of social history.” Social History 20: 355–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eley, Geoff, and Nield, Keith (forthcoming) “Configuring class.” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, James (1994) Radical Expressions: Political Language, Ritual, and Symbol in England, 1790–1850. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (1992) “Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy,” in Calhoun, Craig (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gilroy, Paul (1987) “There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack“: The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Robert (1996) The Factory Question and Industrial England, 1830–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hebdidge, Dick (1979) Subculture: The Meaning of Style. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hebdidge, Dick (1988) Hiding in the Light: On Images and Things. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira (1994) “The ‘bourgeois’ dimension: A provocation about institutions, politics, and the future of labor history.” International Labor and Working-Class History 46: 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Robin D. G. (1994) Race Rebels: Culture, Politics, and the Black Working Class. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Joan (1984) “The doubled vision of feminist theory,” in Women, History and Theory: The Essays of Joan Kelly. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda (1988) “Separate spheres, female worlds, woman's place: The rhetoric of women's history.” Journal of American History 75: 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludtke, Alf (ed.) (1994) The History of Everyday Life: Reconstructing Historical Experiences and Ways of Life. Trans. William Templer. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maynes, Mary Jo (1995) Taking the Hard Road: Life Course in French and German Workers' Autobiographies in the Era of Industrialization. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
McNall, Scott, Levine, Rhonda, and Fantasia, Rick (eds.) (1991) Bringing Class Back In: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pred, Allan, and Watts, Michael John (1992) Reworking Modernity: Capitalisms and Symbolic Discontent. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Mary (1990) Women in Public: Between Banners and Ballots, 1825–1880. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean Paul (1976) Critique of Dialectical Reason. Vol. 1. Trans. Alan Sheridan Smith, ed. Ree, Jonathan. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. (1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. (1990) The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loic (1991) “Making class: The middle class(es) in social theory and social structure,” in McNall, Scott, Levine, Rhonda, and Fantasia, Rick (eds.) Bringing Class Back In: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion (1994) “Gender as seriality: Thinking about women as a social collective.” Signs 19: 713–38.Google Scholar