Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T04:47:07.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Work, Status, and Income

Men in the American Occupational Structure since the Late Nineteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Matthew Sobek
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The historical record rarely presents researchers with precisely the evidence they desire. This is particularly true for social historians and like-minded scholars, whose subjects left precious few signs of their passing. Consequently, certain data have borne a disproportionate evidentiary load in social-historical research. The occupation a person pursued is one key piece of information on which scholars have come to depend. Our understanding of the historical social structure and where people fit into it is bound up with the interpretation of occupations. But this reliance on occupation as the primary social locator in historical research depends on some largely unexamined premises. Whether scholars group occupations or convert them into numerical status measures, they make assumptions about the nature of the occupational structure. When researchers incorporate change over time into their analyses, they suggest that the meaning of occupations remained stable for the purpose of measuring social mobility, class position, or group status-attainment. This assumption has been the subject of little discussion and even less research. For all the use to which historians have put occupation, there has been little effort to assess systematically its stability as a social or economic indicator.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , Summer 1996, pp. 169 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abel, Marjorie, and Folbre, Nancy (1990) “A methodology for revising estimates: Female market participation in the U.S. before 1940.” Historical Methods 23: 167–76.Google Scholar
Acker, Joan (1980) “Women and stratification: A review of recent literature.” Contemporary Sociology 9: 25–39.Google Scholar
Blumin, Stuart (1968) “The historical study of vertical mobility.” Historical Methods 1: 1–13.Google Scholar
Bose, Christine (1987) “Devaluing women’s work: The undercount of women’s employment in 1900 and 1980,” in Christine Bose, Roslyn Feldberg, and Sokoloff, Natalie (eds.) Hidden Aspects of Women’s Work. New York: Praeger: 95–115.Google Scholar
Brown, Clair (1994) American Standards of Living, 1918–1988. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan, Ransom, Roger, Sutch, Richard, and Zhao, Hongcheng (1993a) Codebook and User’s Manual: A Survey of 1165 Workers in Kansas, 1884–1887, Reported in the First, Second, and Third Annual Reports of the Kansas Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics [machine-readable dataset]. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Business and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan, Ransom, Roger, Sutch, Richard, and Zhao, Hongcheng (1993b) Codebook and User’s Manual: A Survey of 514 Male Wage-Earners in Kansas, 1895, Reported in the Eleventh Annual Report of the Kansas Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics [machine-readable dataset]. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Business and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan, Ransom, Roger, Sutch, Richard, and Zhao, Hongcheng (1993c) Codebook and User’s Manual: A Survey of 539 Wage-Earners in Kansas, 1896, Reported in the Twelfth Annual Report of the Kansas Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics [machine-readable dataset]. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Business and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan, Ransom, Roger, Sutch, Richard, and Zhao, Hongcheng (1993d) Codebook and User’s Manual: A Survey of 1204 Wage-Earners in Kansas, 1897, Reported in the Thirteenth Annual Report of the Kansas Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics [machine-readable dataset]. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Business and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan, Ransom, Roger, Sutch, Richard, and Zhao, Hongcheng (1993e) Codebook and User’s Manual: A Survey of 711 Male Wage-Earners in New Hampshire, 1894, Reported in the Second Annual Report of the Bureau of Labor of the State of New Hampshire [machine-readable dataset]. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Business and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan, Ransom, Roger, Sutch, Richard, and Zhao, Hongcheng (1993f) Codebook and User’s Manual: A Survey of 1490 Male Mechanics’ and Workingmen’s Returns in Wisconsin, 1895, Reported in the Seventh Biennial Report of the Wisconsin Bureau of Labor, Census, and Industrial Statistics [machine-readable dataset]. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Business and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan, Ransom, Roger, Sutch, Richard, and Zhao, Hongcheng (1993g) Codebook and User’s Manual: A Survey of 3493 Wage-Earners in California, 1892, Reported in the Fifth Biennial Report of the California Bureau of Labor Statistics [machine-readable dataset]. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Business and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan, Ransom, Roger, Sutch, Richard, and Zhao, Hongcheng (1993h) Codebook and User’s Manual: Survey of 347 Teachers in Iowa, 1884, Reported in the First Biennial Report of the Iowa Bureau of Labor Statistics [machine-readable dataset]. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Business and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Chiswick, Barry (1991) “Jewish immigrant skill and occupational attainment at the turn of the century.” Explorations in Economic History 28: 64–86.Google Scholar
Coelho, Philip, and Shepherd, James (1976) “Regional differences in real wages: The United States, 1851–1880.” Explorations in Economic History 13: 203–30.Google Scholar
Conk, Margo A. (1978a) “Occupational classification in the United States census: 1870–1940.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 9: 111–30.Google Scholar
Conk, Margo A. (1978b) The United States Census and Labor Force Change: A History of Occupation Statistics, 1870–1940. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Conk, Margo A. (1981) “Accuracy, efficiency, and bias: The interpretation of women’s work in the U.S. census of occupations, 1890–1940.” Historical Methods 14: 65–72.Google Scholar
Conk, Margo A. (1983) “Labor statistics in the American and English census: Making some in vidious comparisons.” Journal of Social History 16: 83–102.Google Scholar
Counts, George (1925) “The social status of occupations: A problem in vocational guidance.” School Review 33: 16–27.Google Scholar
Douglas, Paul (1930) Real Wages in the United States, 1890–1926. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Duboff, Richard (1989) Accumulation and Power: An Economic History of the United States. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Duncan, Otis D. (1961) “A socioeconomic index for all occupations,” in Albert, Reiss Jr. (ed.) Occupations and Social Status. Glencoe, IL: Free: 109–38.Google Scholar
Duncan, Otis D. (1968) “Social stratification and mobility: Problems in the measurement of trend,” in Sheldon, Eleanor and Moore, Wilbert (eds.) Indicators of Social Change: Concepts and Measurements. New York: Sage: 675–719.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard (1980) Birth and Fortune: The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Edwards, Alba (1938) A Social-Economic Grouping of the Gainful Workers of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Featherman, David, and Hauser, Robert (1976) “Prestige or socioeconomic scales in the study of occupational achievement?” Sociological Methods and Research 4: 403–22.Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy (1993) “Women’s informal market work in Massachusetts, 1875–1920.” Social Science History 17: 135–60.Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy, and Abel, Marjorie (1989) “Women’s work and women’s households: Gender bias in the U.S. census.” Social Research 56: 545–70.Google Scholar
Ganzeboom, Harry, De Graff, Paul, and Treiman, Donald (1992) “A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status.” Social Science Research 21: 1–56.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia (1986) “The female labor force and American economic growth, 1890–1980,” in Engerman, Stanley and Gallman, Robert (eds.) Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 557–604.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia (1990) Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Stephan (1980) 1900 Public Use Sample: User’s Handbook [machine-readable dataset]. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Griffen, Clyde (1972) “Occupational mobility in nineteenth-century America: Problems and possibilities.” Journal of Social History 5: 310–30.Google Scholar
Griffen, Clyde, and Griffen, Sally (1978) Natives and Newcomers: The Ordering of Opportunity in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Poughkeepsie. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael (1981) “Poverty, economic stress, and the family in a late nineteenth-century American city: Whites in Philadelphia, 1880,” in Hershberg, Theodore (ed.) Philadelphia: Work, Space, Family, and Group Experience in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press: 240–76.Google Scholar
Haug, Marie (1977) “Measurement in social stratification.” Annual Review of Sociology 3: 51–77.Google Scholar
Hauser, Robert (1982) “Occupational status in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.” Historical Methods 15: 111–26.Google Scholar
Hershberg, Theodore, et al. (1974) “Occupation and ethnicity in five nineteenth-century cities: A collaborative inquiry.” Historical Methods 7: 174–216.Google Scholar
Hershberg, Theodore, and Dockhorn, Robert (1976) “Occupational classification.” Historical Methods 9: 59–98.Google Scholar
Historical Methods (1995) The Minnesota Historical Census Projects [special issue] 28: 1–78.Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert, Siegel, Paul, and Rossi, Peter (1964) “Occupational prestige in the United States, 1925–1963.” American Journal of Sociology 70: 286–302.Google Scholar
Katz, Michael (1972) “Occupational classification in history.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 3: 63–88.Google Scholar
King, Willford (1930) The National Income and Its Purchasing Power. New York: NBER.Google Scholar
Landale, Nancy, and Guest, Avery (1990) “Generation, ethnicity, and occupational opportunity in late nineteenth-century America.” American Sociological Review 55: 280–96.Google Scholar
Laurie, Bruce, Hershberg, Theodore, and Alter, George (1981) “Immigrants in industry: The Philadelphia experience, 1850–1880,” in Hershberg, Theodore (ed.) Philadelphia: Work, Space, Family, and Group Experience in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press: 93–119.Google Scholar
Lebergott, Stanley (1964) Manpower in Economic Growth: The American Record since 1800. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lee, Susan P., and Passell, Peter (1979) A New Economic View of American History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Meeker, Edward, and Kau, James (1977) “Racial discrimination and occupational attainment at the turn of the century.” Explorations in Economic History 14: 250–76.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley (1921) Income in the United States: Its Amount and Distribution, 1909–1919. New York: NBER.Google Scholar
Model, Suzanne W (1988) “Italian and Jewish intergenerational mobility: New York, 1910.” Social Science History 12: 31–48.Google Scholar
Model, Suzanne W (1993) “The ethnic niche and the structure of opportunity: Immigrants and minorities in New York City,” in Katz, Michael (ed.) The Underclass Debate: Views from History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 161–93.Google Scholar
Nam, Charles, and Powers, Mary (1983) The Socioeconomic Approach to Status Measurement. Houston: Cap and Gown.Google Scholar
Perlmann, Joel (1985) “Who stayed in school? Social structure and academic achievement in the determination of enrollment patterns, Providence, Rhode Island, 1880–1925.” Journal of American History 72: 588–614.Google Scholar
Perlmann, Joel (1988) Ethnic Differences: Schooling and Social Structure among the Irish, Italians, Jews, and Blacks in an American City, 1880–1935. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pessen, Edward (1976) “Social configuration of the antebellum city: An historical and theoretical inquiry.” Journal of Urban History 2: 267–306.Google Scholar
Preston, Samuel, and Haines, Michael (1991) Fatal Years: Child Mortality in Late Nineteenth-Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sherwin (1970) “Unionism and the occupational wage structure in the United States.” International Economic Review 11: 269–85.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, et al. (1993) 1880 Public Use Microdata Sample: User’s Guide and Technical Documentation [machine-readable dataset]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Social History Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
Sharlin, Allan (1980) “On the universality of occupational prestige.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 11: 115–25.Google Scholar
Sobek, Matthew (1995) “The comparability of occupations and the generation of income scores.” Historical Methods 28: 47–51.Google Scholar
Stewart, Andrew, and Blackburn, Robert (1975) “The stability of structural inequality.” Sociological Review 23: 481–508.Google Scholar
Stewart, Andrew, Prandy, Kenneth, and Blackburn, Robert (1980) Social Stratification and Occupations. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Strieker, Frank (1988) “American professors in the Progressive Era: Incomes, aspirations, and professionalism.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 19: 231–57.Google Scholar
Strong, Michael, et al. (1989) User’s Guide: Public Use Sample: 1910 United States Census of Population [machine-readable dataset]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Population Studies Center.Google Scholar
Szreter, S. R. S. (1993) “The official representation of social classes in Britain, the United States, and France: The professional model and ‘Les Cadres.’” Comparative Study of Society and History 35: 285–317.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan (1964) Poverty and Progress: Social Mobility in a Nineteenth Century City. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan (1973) The Other Bostonians: Poverty and Progress in the American Metropolis, 1880–1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Treiman, Donald (1976) “A standard occupational prestige scale for use with historical data.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7: 283–304.Google Scholar
Tyree, Andrea, and Smith, Billy G. (1978) “Occupational hierarchy in the United States: 1789–1969.” Social Forces 56: 881–99.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1872) Ninth Census of the United States, 1870. Vol. 1, Population. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1903) Twelfth Census of the United States. Special Report: Employees and Wages [Dewey Report]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1950) 1950 Census of Population: Alphabetic Index of Occupations and Industries. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1956) 1950 Census of Population. Special Report: Occupational Characteristics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1975) Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1984) Census of Population, 1950: Public Use Sample Technical Documentation [machine-readable dataset]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1992) Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Public Use Microdata Samples: Technical Documentation [machine-readable dataset]. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor (1886) First Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, 1886: Industrial Depressions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor (1894) Seventh Special Report of the Commissioner of Labor, 1894: The Slums of New York, Chicago, Baltimore, and Philadelphia. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor (1897) Eleventh Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, 1895-96: Work and Wages of Men, Women, and Children. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor (1900) Fifteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, 1900: Wages in Commercial Countries. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor (1904) Eighteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, 1903: Cost of Living and Retail Prices of Food. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor (1905) Nineteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, 1904: Wages and Hours of Labor. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1893) Wholesale Prices, Wages, and Transportation [Aldrich Report]. 52d Cong., 2d sess., S. Rpt. 1394.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey, and Lindert, Peter (1980) American Inequality: A Macroeconomic History. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik O. (1980a) “Class and occupation.” Theory and Society 9: 177–214.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik O. (1980b) “Varieties of Marxist conceptions of class structure.” Politics and Society 9: 323–70.Google Scholar
Zunz, Olivier (1982) The Changing Face of Inequality: Urbanization, Industrial Development, and Immigrants in Detroit, 1880–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar