Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:05:14.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consensus and Cooperation on State Supreme Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Meghan E. Leonard and
Joseph V. Ross
Meghan E. Leonard*
Affiliation:
Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA
Joseph V. Ross
Affiliation:
Florida Gulf Coast University, Ft. Myers, FL, USA
*
Meghan E. Leonard, Department of Politics and Government, Illinois State University, P.O. Box 4600, Normal, IL 61790-4600, USA. Email: mleonar@ilstu.edu
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The opinion-writing process is a vital yet understudied aspect of judicial decision making on state supreme courts. We argue that this process is influenced by the political context and particularly by institutional rules that serve to reactivate and reinforce divisions among justices, leading to less cooperation on the court. We test our theory with original data comprising all education cases decided from 1995 to 2005 in all 50 states and find evidence to support our theory. Specifically, we find that elections lead to fewer unanimous decisions and more separate written opinions, indicating that judicial elections may have a more pervasive effect on the daily work of these courts than previously thought.

Keywords

judicial behaviorjudicial politicsjudicial electionsjudicial selectionpublic law

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2014, pp. 3 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baird, Vanessa A. 2001. “Building Institutional Legitimacy: The Role of Procedural Justice.” Political Research Quarterly 54(2): 333–54.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesh, Sara C. 2006. “Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts.” The Journal of Politics 68(3): 697–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesh, Sara C., and Martinek, Wendy L.. 2002. “State Supreme Court Decision Making in Confession Cases.” Justice System Journal 23(1): 109–33.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, Chris W. 2005. “What Price Justice(s)? Understanding Campaign Spending in State Supreme Court Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5(2): 107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, Chris W. 2007. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in State Supreme Court Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 60(3): 489–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, Chris W., and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Boyea, Brent D.. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2): 360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1990. “Neo-institutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts.” The Journal of Politics 52(1): 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1993. “Integrated Models of Judicial Dissent.” The Journal of Politics 55(4): 914–35.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, Langer, Laura, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” The Journal of Politics 62(2): 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldarone, Richard P., Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Clark, Tom S.. 2009. “Partisan Labels and Democratic Accountability: An Analysis of State Supreme Court Abortion Decisions.” The Journal of Politics 71(2): 560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Gibson, James L.. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 635–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Wright, John R.. 1988. “Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court.” The American Political Science Review 82(4): 1109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Zorn, Christopher J. W.. 1998. “Of Time and Consensual Norms in the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 42(3): 874–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Clark, Tom S., and Park, Jee-Kwang. 2012. “Judicial Independence and Retention Elections.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 28(2): 211–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Damon M., and Wilhelm, Teena. 2011. “Case Visibility and the Electoral Connection in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Research 39(3): 557–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Jaros, Dean. 1970. “External Variables, Institutional Structure & Dissent on State Supreme Courts.” Polity 3(2): 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Robert K., Szmer, John, and Stritch, Justin M.. 2012. “Race and Gender Bias in Three Administrative Contexts: Impact on Work Assignments in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(4): 625–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, Pamela C. 2011. Concurring Opinion Writing on the U.S. Supreme Court. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B., and Tiller, Emerson H.. 1998. “Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals.” The Yale Law Journal 107(7): 2155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 66–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2001. “The Norm of Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 362–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flango, Carol R., and Rottman, David B.. 1998. Appellate Court Procedures. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Frederick, Brian, and Streb, Matthew J.. 2008. “Paying the Price for a Seat on the Bench: Campaign Spending in Contested State Intermediate Appellate Court Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 8(4): 410–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2009. “‘New-Style’ Judicial Campaigns and the Legitimacy of State High Courts.” The Journal of Politics 71(4): 1285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 2009. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Gottfried, Jeffrey A., Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2011. “The Effects of Judicial Campaign Activity on the Legitimacy of Courts.” Political Research Quarterly 64(3): 545–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Henry R., and Emmert, Craig F.. 1986. “Selection Systems and Judicial Characteristics: The Recruitment State Supreme Court Judges.” Judicature 70:228–35.Google Scholar
Glick, Henry R., and Vines, Kenneth N.. 1973. State Court Systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gordon, Sanford C., and Huber, Gregory A.. 2007. “The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2(2): 107–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haire, Susan B., Lindquist, Stefanie A., and Songer, Donald R.. 2003. “Appellate Court Supervision in the Federal Judiciary: A Hierarchical Perspective.” Law & Society Review 37(1): 143–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” The Journal of Politics 49:1117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1990. “Opinion Assignment Procedures and Conference Practices in State Supreme Courts.” Judicature 73:209–14.Google Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” The Journal of Politics 54(2): 427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 2007. “Voting in State Supreme Court Elections: Competition and Context As Democratic Incentives.” The Journal of Politics 69(4): 1147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann, and Bonneau, Chris W.. 2006. “Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann, and Brace, Paul. 1989. “Order in the Courts: A Neo-institutional Approach to Judicial Consensus.” The Western Political Quarterly 42(3): 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann, and Brace, Paul. 1992. “Toward an Integrated Model of Judicial Voting Behavior.” American Politics Research 20(2): 147–68.Google Scholar
Harden, Jeffrey J. 2011. “A Bootstrap Method for Conducting Statistical Inference with Clustered Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11(2): 223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, Stacia L. 1992. “Leadership and Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court.” The Journal of Politics 54(4): 1158–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettinger, Virginia A., Lindquist, Stefanie A., and Martinek, Wendy L.. 2004. “Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 48(1): 123–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hettinger, Virginia A., Lindquist, Stefanie A., and Martinek, Wendy L.. 2006. Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Federal Appellate Decision Making. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Gregory A., and Gordon, Sanford C.. 2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office?” American Journal of Political Science 48(2): 247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaros, Dean, and Canon, Bradley C.. 1971. “Dissent on State Supreme Courts: The Differential Significance of Characteristics of Judges.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 15(2): 322–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2007. “Panel Composition and Judicial Compliance on the US Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23(2): 421–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2011. “Hierarchical and Collegial Politics on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” The Journal of Politics 73(2): 345–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, David E. 2002. Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Laura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Langer, Laura. 2003. “Strategic Considerations and Judicial Review: The Case of Workers' Compensation Laws in the American States.” Public Choice 116(1): 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Cameron, Charles M.. 2007. “Bargaining and Opinion Assignment on the US Supreme Court.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 23(2): 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest, Spriggs, James F., and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest, and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 1996. “Inside the U.S. Supreme Court: The Reliability of the Justices' Conference Records.” The Journal of Politics 58(2): 528–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1972. “Policy Goals, Strategic Choice, and Majority Opinion Assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 16(4): 652–82.Google Scholar
Sample, James, Skaggs, Adam, Blitzer, Jonathan, and Casey, Linda. 2010. The New Politics of Judicial Elections, 2000–2009: Decade of Change. Washington, DC: Justice at Stake Campaign.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, Charles H., and Maule, Linda S.. 1997. Choosing Justice: The Recruitment of State and Federal Judges. Pullman: Washington State University Press.Google Scholar
Sickels, Robert J. 1965. “The Illusion of Judicial Consensus: Zoning Decisions in the Maryland Court of Appeals.” The American Political Science Review 59(1): 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaggs, Adam, Silva, Maria da, Casey, Linda, and Hall, Charles. 2011. The New Politics of Judicial Elections: 2009–10. Washington, DC: Justice at Stake Campaign.Google Scholar
Slotnick, Elliot E. 1977. “Who Speaks for the Court—The View from the States.” Emory Law Journal 26:107.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cameron, Charles M.. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 673–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spriggs, James F. 1997. “Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions.” Political Research Quarterly 50(3): 567–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2008. “Measuring the Professionalization of U.S. State Courts of Last Resort.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 8(3): 223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streb, Matthew J., Frederick, Brian, and LaFrance, Casey. 2009. “Voter Rolloff in a Low-Information Context: Evidence from Intermediate Appellate Court Elections.” American Politics Research 37(4): 644–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vining, Richard L., and Wilhelm, Teena. 2011. “Measuring Case Salience in State Courts of Last Resort.” Political Research Quarterly 64(3): 559–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vining, Richard L., Wilhelm, Teena, Hiers, Sara E., and Marcin, Phil. 2010. “Patterns of Newspaper Reporting on State Supreme Courts.” Justice System Journal 31:273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, Teena. 2007. “The Policymaking Role of State Supreme Courts in Education Policy.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(2): 309–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar