Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T01:08:48.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness, Implementation, and Policy Diffusion: Or “Can We Make That Work for Us?”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Sean Nicholson-Crotty and
Sanya Carley
Sean Nicholson-Crotty*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
Sanya Carley
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
*
Sean Nicholson-Crotty, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, 1315 E. 10th St., Rm#325, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA. Email: seanicho@indiana.edu
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Policy learning has been one of the primary mechanisms by which policy innovations are assumed to diffuse from one jurisdiction to another. Recent research suggests, however, that learning is more than simply observing policy adoption in other jurisdictions and must also include an assessment of the outcomes or effectiveness of those policies. This article argues that an assessment of the ability to implement an innovation is also likely to be a component of the learning process. Specifically, it argues that potential adopters are likely to ask not only, “Was the policy effective in other states that adopted it?” but also, “Can we make the policy work for us?” We test hypotheses drawn from this general argument in a directed dyad analysis of renewable portfolio standards in the American states between 1997 and 2009. Results indicate that shared implementation environments among jurisdictions help determine the impact that information about policy effectiveness has on adoption decisions. These findings suggest that implementation concerns may be an important part of the policy learning process.

Keywords

public policyenergy policypolicy adoptionrenewable portfolio standarddiffusionsocial learningeffectivenesscompliance

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 16 , Issue 1: Special Issue Title: Policy Diffusion , March 2016, pp. 78 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Balla, Steven J. 2001. “Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations.” American Politics Research 39:221–45.Google Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.” The American Political Science Review 84(2): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1992. “Tax Innovation in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity.” American Journal of Political Science 36:715–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-1993.” American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 2007. “The Measurement and Stability of State Citizen Ideology.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7(2): 111–32.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Fording, Richard C., Ringquist, Evan J., Hanson, Russell L., and Klarner, Carl E.. 2010. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States: A Re-appraisal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10(2):117–35. http://rcfording.wordpress.com/state-ideology-data/ (accessed January 19, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J., and Witmer, Richard. 2004. “Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion.” Political Research Quarterly 57(1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, F. J. 2009. Policy emulation or policy convergence? Potential ambiguities in the dyadic event history approach to state policy emulation. The Journal of Politics 71(3): 1125–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carley, S. 2009. State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energy Policy 37(8): 3071–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carley, Sanya, and Miller, Chris J.. 2012. “Regulatory Stringency and Policy Drivers: A Reassessment of Renewable Portfolio Standards.” Policy Studies Journal 40(4): 730–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Jess. 2009. “Trendy Solutions: Why do States Adopt Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standards?” Energy Policy 37:3274–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, Magali, Russo, Michael V., and Montes-Sancho, Maria J.. 2007. “Deregulation and Environmental Differentiation in the Electric Utility Industry.” Strategic Management Journal 28(2):189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, F. 2012. Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies. Handbook of International Relations 2.Google Scholar
Gilardi, F., and Füglister, K. 2008. Empirical modeling of policy diffusion in federal states: the dyadic approach. Swiss Political Science Review 14(3): 413–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, F., Füglister, K., and Luyet, S. 2009. Learning from others the diffusion of hospital financing reforms in oecd countries. Comparative Political Studies 42(4): 549–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia. 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.” American Political Science Review 67:1174–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossback, Lawrence J., Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Peterson, David A. M.. 2004. “Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion.” American Politics Research 32(5): 521–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Michael J., and Hupe, Peter L.. 2002. Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Huang, Ming-Yuan, Alavalapati, Janaki R. R., Carter, Douglas R., and Langholtz, Matthew H.. 2007. “Is the Choice of Renewable Portfolio Standards Random?” Energy Policy 35(11): 5571–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D., and Shipan, Charles R.. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D., Shipan, Charles R., and Pfahler, Madelaine. 2001. “Legislatures and Statutory Control of Bureaucracy.” American Journal of Political Science 45:330–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, Andrew. 2007. Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion among the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, Thomas P., and Yin, Haitao. 2010. “Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards? An Empirical Investigation.” Energy Journal 31(3): 133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, Daniel C. 2008. “The Adoption of State Climate Change Policies and Renewable Portfolio Standards: Regional Diffusion or Internal Determinants?” Review of Policy Research 25(6): 527–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew D., Noll, Roger G., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1989. “Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies.” Virginia Law Review 75:431–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew D., and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28:165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, Covadonga. 2005. “Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598(1): 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintrom, Michael. 1997. “Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.” American Journal of Political Science 42:738–70.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael, and Vergari, Sandra. 1998. “Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of Education Reform.” Journal of Politics 60:126–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1989. “The Politics of Bureaucratic Structure.” Can the Government Govern? 267:285–323.Google Scholar
National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 1991. Solar Radiation Data Manual for Flat-Plate and Concentrating Collectors. http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/pubs/redbook/ (accessed January 3, 2008).Google Scholar
North Carolina Solar Center. 2014. Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy (DSIRE). http://www.dsireusa.org (accessed February 16, 2014).Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey, and Wildavvsky, Aaron. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoutenborough, J. W., and Beverlin, M. 2008. Encouraging Pollution-Free Energy: The Diffusion of State Net Metering Policies*. Social Science Quarterly 89(5): 1230–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2010. Regional Economic Accounts: Gross Domestic ProductbyState. https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/gdp_state/gsp_newsrelease.htm (accessed November 24, 2010).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. 2011. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy: Wind Powering America. http://www.windpoweringamerica.gov/wind_maps.asp (accessed September 21, 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2010. Electricity Price by State and End-User, 1990–2008. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/ (accessed November 18, 2010).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. State CO2 Emissions from Fossil Fuel Combustion. http://www.epa.gov/statelocalclimate/resources/state_energyco2inv.html (accessed March 28, 2012).Google Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2002. “The Politics of Competitive Federalism: A Race to the Bottom in Welfare Benefits?” American Journal of Political Science 46:352–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2006. “States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children's Health Insurance Program.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 294–312..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, Ting, Michael, and Carpenter, Daniel. 2008. “A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion.” American Political Science Review 102:319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63(3): 880–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt G. 2004. Learning from Foreign Models in Latin American Policy Reform. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt G. 2005. “Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform.” World Politics 57(2): 262–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2007. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, Joshua G., and Koontz, Tomas M.. 2010. “Shifting Winds: Explaining Variation in State Policies to Promote Small-Scale Wind Energy.” Policy Studies Journal 38(4): 629–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, Hongtao, and Feiock, Richard. 2012. “Policy Tool Interactions and the Adoption of State Renewable Portfolio Standards.” Review of Policy Research 29(2): 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar