Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T03:06:50.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Linear Models with Outliers: Choosing between Conditional-Mean and Conditional-Median Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Jeffrey J. Harden*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
Bruce A. Desmarais
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts–Amherst, USA
*
Jeffrey J. Harden, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Political Science, 312 Hamilton Hall, CB #3265, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 Email: jjharden@unc.edu

Abstract

State politics researchers commonly employ ordinary least squares (OLS) regression or one of its variants to test linear hypotheses. However, OLS is easily influenced by outliers and thus can produce misleading results when the error term distribution has heavy tails. Here we demonstrate that median regression (MR), an alternative to OLS that conditions the median of the dependent variable (rather than the mean) on the independent variables, can be a solution to this problem. Then we propose and validate a hypothesis test that applied researchers can use to select between OLS and MR in a given sample of data. Finally, we present two examples from state politics research in which (1) the test selects MR over OLS and (2) differences in results between the two methods could lead to different substantive inferences. We conclude that MR and the test we propose can improve linear models in state politics research.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable