Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T20:38:10.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perception of English Voicing by Native and Nonnative Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Z. S. Bond and
Joann Fokes
Z. S. Bond
Affiliation:
Ohio University
Joann Fokes
Affiliation:
Ohio University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recordings of naturally produced stop-vowel English words with a wide range of voice onset time values were used to investigate nonnative perception of voicing categories. L2 learners of English from nine language groups and native American English speakers served as subjects. The responses of the language learners suggested that they were using a hybrid perceptual system, one in which the English voicing categories were not yet fully established.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 1991, pp. 471 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abramson, A. S., & Lisker, L. (1973). Voice-timing perception in Spanish word-intial stops. Journal of Phonetics, 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., MacRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of the perceptual re-organization for for speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 245–260.Google Scholar
Bond, Z. S., & Fokes, J. (1988, 11). Voicing perception by normal and language disordered children. Paper presented at ASHA Convention, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Borden, G, Gerber, A., & Milsark, G. (1983). Production and perception of the/r/-/1/ contrast in Korean adults learning English. Language Learning, 33, 499–526.Google Scholar
Brière, E. J. (1966). An investigation of phonological interference. Language, 42, 768–796.Google Scholar
Burnham, D. K. (1986). Developmental loss of speech perception: Exposure to and experience with a first language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 207–240.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A, Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Zurif, E. B., & Carbone, E. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53, 421–428.Google Scholar
Clark, J. E. (1983). Intelligibility comparisons for two synthetic and one natural speech source. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 37–49.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L., Diehl, R. L., & Buchwald, S. E. (1977). Perceptual switching in bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 971–974.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W (1987a). Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of English. Speech Communication 6, 185–202.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987b). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Port, R. (1981). Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech, 24, 125–146.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1984). Development of speech perception and speech production abilities in adult second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 51–74.Google Scholar
Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “l” and “r”. Neuropsychologia, 9, 317–323.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1985). The bilingual as a competent but specific speaker-hearer. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 6, 467–477.Google Scholar
Han, M. S., & Weitsman, R. S. (1970). Acoustic Features of Korean /PTK/, /ptk/ and /ph th kh/. Phonetica, 22, 112–128.Google Scholar
Horii, K. (1989). Perception of the Japanese voiceless and voiced stops by American and Korean learners of Japanese. Ohio University Working Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching (Department of Linguistics, Ohio University), 10, 35–43.Google Scholar
Huffman, F. E. (1970). Modern spoken Cambodian. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, P. A., Mikos, M. J., Ganong, W. F. (1981). A cross-language study of range of voice onset time in the perception of initial stop voicing. Journal of the Acoustical society of America, 70, 1261–1271.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. (1978). In qualified defense of VOT. Language and Speech, 21, 375–383.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in intial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.Google Scholar
Lotz, J., Abramson, A. S., Gerstman, L. J., Ingemann, F., & Nemser, W. J. (1960). The perception of English stops by speakers of English, Spanish, Hungarian, and Thai: A tape-cutting experiment. Language and Speech, 3, 71–77.Google Scholar
MacKain, K. S., Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1981). Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 369–390.Google Scholar
Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A., & Jenkins, J. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] an [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 331–340.Google Scholar
Mochizuki, M. (1981). The identification of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthesized speech. Journal of Phonetics, 9, 283–303.Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B., Logan, J. S., & Lively, S. E. (1989). Perceptual learning of nonnative speech contrasts: Implications for theories of speech perception. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report (Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University), 15, 3–57.Google Scholar
Polka, L. (1987, 05). Perception of Persian uvular and velar stop consonants by speakers of American English. Paper presented at the meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Rochet, B., (1989, 05). Assessing the perception of foreign speech sounds. Paper presented at the meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
Ruhlen, M. (1976). A guide to the languages of the world. Language Universals Project, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A. (1985). The relationship between production and perception of the /r/-/l/ contrast in Korean adults learning English: A reply to Borden, Gerber, and Milsark. Language Learning, 35, 107–118.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243–261.Google Scholar
Swets, J. A. (1964). Signal detection and recognition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (1977). The voicing contrast in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 169–184.Google Scholar
Wood, C. C. (1976). Discriminability, response bias, and phoneme categories in discrimination of voice onset time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 1381–1389.Google Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Caramazza, A., & Preston, M. S. (1977). A study of voicing in Lebanese Arabic. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 35–48.Google Scholar