Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-p6fvt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T02:15:55.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ad Minorem Theoriae Gloriam

A Response to Eubank and Gregg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

John H. Schumann
John H. Schumann
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Eubank and Gregg (1995) claim that “Jacobs and Schumann wish to deny the existence of UG” (p. 42). This statement presupposes the existence of Universal Grammar (UG). However, Jacobs, Schumann, and Pulvermuller see the existence of UG and its possible neural substrate as an empirical issue and, therefore, are free to explore it, examine it, and question it. If it were demonstrated that there were, in fact, no UG, it would do great violence to Eubank and Gregg's theory. However, if it were demonstrated that UG did exist, Jacobs, Schumann, and Pulvermüller could easily accommodate this fact in their positions. Jacobs (1988) and Jacobs and Schumann (1992) point out some neural arguments against UG; Pulvermuller and Schumann (1994) actually argue for a neural specialization for grammar but not specifically a UG, and Schumann (1993, 1994) examines differential success in second language acquisition by assuming a highly canalized, neural basis for grammar.

Information

Type
Responses
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 59 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eubank, L., & Gregg, K. (1995). “Et in amygdala ego”?: UG, (S)LA, and neurobiology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1992). Languages of the mind: Essays on mental representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1994). Patterns in the mind: Language and human nature. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jacobs, B. (1988). Neurobiological differentiation of primary and secondary language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 303–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, B., & Schumann, J. (1992). Language acquisition and the neurosciences: Towards a more integrative perspective. Applied Linguistics, 13, 282–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, S. (1994, 05 2). Dr. Edelman's brain. The New Yorker, pp. 62–73.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1992). The child's path to spoken language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., & Schumann, J. H. (1994). Neurobiological mechanisms of language acquisition. Language Learning, 44, 681–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. (1993). The neuropsychology of cognitive/affective interaction in sustained deep learning. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (1994). Where is cognition? Emotion and cognition in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar