Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T04:18:01.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Instrumental Motivation In Language Study

Who Says It Isn't Effective?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

R. C. Gardner  and
P. D. MacIntyre
R. C. Gardner
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
P. D. MacIntyre
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The major purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of integrative motivation and instrumental motivation on the learning of French/English vocabulary. Integrative motivation was defined in terms of a median split on scores obtained on subtests from the Attitude/Motivation Test Battery, while instrumental motivation was situationally determined in terms of monetary reward for doing well. The results demonstrated that both integrative motivation and instrumental motivation facilitated learning. Other results indicated that instrumentally motivated students studied longer than noninstrumentally motivated students when there was an opportunity to profit from learning, but this distinction disappeared when the incentive was removed. Both integratively and instrumentally motivated students spent more time thinking about the correct answer than those not so motivated, suggesting that both elements have an energizing effect. A secondary purpose of this study was to assess the consequences of computer administration of the Attitude/Motivation Test Battery. In this respect the results were most encouraging. Computer administration appeared not to detract from the internal consistency reliability of the subscales used, and moreover there was an indication that an index of reaction time to individual items might provide a way of identifying social desirability responding

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 57 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive language training. In Glaser, R. (Ed.), Training research and education (pp. 87–136). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Chihara, T., & Oller, J. W. (1978). Attitudes and attained proficiency in EFL: A sociolinguistic study of adult Japanese speakers. Language Learning, 28, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément, R., & Kruidenier, B. G. (1983). Orientations in second language acquisition: I. The effects of ethnicity, milieu and target language on their emergence. Language Learning, 33, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkel, H. B. (1948). Second-language learning. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1983). Learning another language: A true social psychological experiment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 219–239.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C., Lalonde, R. N., & Moorcroft, R. (1985). The role of attitudes and motivation in second language learning: Correlational and experimental considerations. Language Learning, 35, 207–227.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1975). Motivation and second-language acquisition. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 218–230.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C., Smythe, P. C., & Lalonde, R. N. (1984). The nature and replicability of factors in second language acquisition. (Research Bulletin No. 605). Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.Google Scholar
Hsu, L. M., Santelli, J., & Hsu, J. R. (1989). Faking detection validity and incremental validity of response latencies to MMPI subtle and obvious items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 278–295.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (1974). Personality research form manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. E. (1974). Culture and language as factors in learning and education. In Aboud, F. E. & Meade, R. D. (Eds.), Cultural factors in learning and education. Proceedings of the Fifth Western Washington Symposium on Learning (pp. 91–122). Bellingham: Western Washington State College.Google Scholar
Lukmani, Y. M. (1972). Motivation to learn and learning proficiency. Language Learning, 22, 261–273.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1989). Anxiety and second language learning: Toward a theoretical clarification. Language Learning, 39, 251–275.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W., Baca, L., & Vigil, F. (1977). Attitudes and attained proficiency in ESL: A sociolinguistic study of Mexican-Americans in the Southwest. Tesol Quarterly, 11, 173–182.Google Scholar
Oller, J. W., Hudson, A., & Liu, P. (1977). Attitudes and attained proficiency in ESL: A sociolinguistic study of native speakers of Chinese in the United States. Language Learning, 27, 1–27.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tobias, S. (1979). Anxiety research in educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 573–582.Google Scholar