Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-w5hgh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T13:43:03.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Curricular and Extra-Curricular Factors in Multilingual Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Alex Housen and
Hugo Baetens Beardsmore
Alex Housen
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Hugo Baetens Beardsmore
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of multilingual acquisition processes in the European School of Brussels reveals how both curricular and extra-curricular factors combine to account for high levels of proficiency in three or four languages. The school operates in seven languages, and all pupils must learn at least three, though the combination is open to choice. Curricular design ties in with the prerequisites for success as posited in Cummins' (1981, 1984) Interaction Hypothesis, Krashen's (1982) Input Hypothesis, and Swain's (1983) Output Hypothesis. These alone do not account for the high levels of achievement attested, because they do not include the extra-curricular factors which provide the essential supplementary conditions for active, productive use of a given language in meaningful two-way negotiation among peers. Schumann's (1979) Acculturation Model allows one to tap this primordial extra-curricular factor, even though it was not designed for an educational context. Four soft techniques were used to test the hypotheses: participant observation, written questionnaires, informal interviews, and open-ended formal interviews based on a 26-item questionnaire (N = 8). Results indicate that only Schumann's model can bring to the fore whether self-initiated meaningful two-way negotiation is used as a supplement to formal instruction in a multilingual environment; they also show how social and psychological distance tie in with curricular structure to enhance the acquisition process.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , February 1987, pp. 83 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Baetens Beardsmore, H. (1979). Bilingual education for highly mobile children. Language Problems and Language Planning, 3, 138–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baetens Beardsmore, H. (1980). Bilingual education in international schools, European schools and experimental schools: A comparative analysis. In Boey, Lim Kial (Ed.), Bilingual education (pp. 3–19). Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Baetens Beardsmore, H., & Swain, M. (1985). Designing bilingual education: Aspects of immersion and “European school” models. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 6, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balke-Aurell, G., & Lindblad, T. (1982). Immigrant students and their languages (Report No. 23). Gothenburg, Sweden: Department of Educational Research, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 221–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting education success for language minority students. In Schooling and Language Minority Students: A Theoretical Framework (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Assessment and Dissemination Center.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1983). Wanted: A theoretical framework for relating language proficiency to academic achievement among bilingual students. In Rivera, C. (Ed.), Language proficiency and academic achievement (pp. 2–19). Clevedon: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., Tucker, G., & Lambert, W. (1976). An experiment in trilingual education: Report 3. Canadian Modem Language Journal, 34, 621–643.Google Scholar
Jung, U. (1981). Englisch als Fremdsprache für Kinder mit Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Grazer Linguistischen Studien, 14, 83–97.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Mägiste, E. (1984). Learning a third language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 5, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. (1975). Affective factors and the problem of age in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 25, 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. (1976). Social distance as a factor in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 26, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. (1978). The acculturation model for second language acquisition. In Gringas, R. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 27–50). Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. (1979). Second language acquisition. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. (in press). Research on the acculturation model for second language acquisition. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1983). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Paper presented at the Xth Michigan Conference on Applied Linguistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar