Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T18:30:17.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EVALUATING THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRUCTURED-INPUT AND OUTPUT-BASED INSTRUCTION IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING

Results from an Experimental Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2003

Rosemary Erlam
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This paper reErlamviews studies that have contrasted the effectiveness of structured-input instruction with output-based instruction. It then presents results from a study comparing the relative effects of structured-input and output-based instruction on students' ability to comprehend and produce direct object pronouns in second language French. Three classes of students (N = 70) were assigned to three groups: structured-input instruction, output-based instruction, and control. Students were assessed on listening comprehension, reading comprehension, written production, and oral production tasks. All but one of these language measures required a pressured response. Overall, the results showed greater gains for the output-based instruction group.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2003 Cambridge University Press