Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T01:09:21.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immigrant Children in Infant-Class Interactions

Opportunities for Second Language Acquisition of Young Multilingual Children in Dutch Infant Classes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Resi Damhuis
Resi Damhuis
Affiliation:
SCO-Kohnstamm Institute, University of Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reports on research aimed at identifying ways of improving the contribution of Dutch infant classes to the second language acquisition of nonnative children. Verbal interactions in 15 Dutch infant classes with immigrant children were investigated. Conversations were audiotaped during five types of activity: the pupil-centered conversation, the instructional exchange, the children's group, the small-group-with-teacher, and the special second-language group. Several input and production features, which are assumed to facilitate second language acquisition, were analyzed. Potentially, the special second language group offers the best opportunities for second language acquisition with respect to input and response production; the children's group is the most favorable activity with respect to self-initiated production. Regarding the actual contribution of the five activities to an average infant-class day, however, the children's group offers most of the beneficial interaction for second-language acquisition. Implications for the teaching of young multilingual children are presented.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 305 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Appel, R. (1984). Immigrant children learning Dutch: Sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic aspects of second language acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, A. P., & Edwards, V. (1991). ‘I treat them all the same’: Teacher-pupil talk in multiethnic classrooms. Language and Education, 5, 161–176.Google Scholar
Boers, M., Kienstra, M., & Padmos, M. (1993). Taalplan kleuters: Werkplannen groep 1 en groep 2. Rotterdam: Het Projectbureau.Google Scholar
Boogaard, M., Damhuis, R., de Glopper, K., & van den Bergh, H. (1990). De Nederlandse taalvaardigheid van allochtone en Nederlandse kleuters. Peiling van de taalvaardigheid van Surinaamse, Antilliaanse, Marokkaanse, Turkse en Nederlandse leerlingen aan het einde van de kleuterperiode. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Cathcart, R. (1986). Situational differences and the sampling of young children's school language. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 118–140). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Cathcart-Strong, R. L. (1986). Input generation by young second language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1983). Foreigner talk in the classroom: An aid to learning? In Seliger, H. W. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 127–145). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, V. P. (1989). How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 509–533.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles: California State University, National Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center.Google Scholar
Damhuis, R. (1988). Tweede-taalverwerving in kleutergroepen; een onderzoek naar de gelegenheid tot het leren van het Nederlands door Turkse en Marokkaanse kleuters (Report No. 164). Amsterdam: Stichting Centrum voor Onderwijsonderzoek [Center for Educational Research].Google Scholar
Driessen, G., De Bot, K., & Jungbluth, P. (1989). De effectiviteit van het onderwijs in eigen taal en cultuur. Prestaties van Marokkaanse, Spaanse en Turkse leerlingen. Nijmegen: Instituut voor Toegepaste Sociale Wetenschappen [Institute for Applied Social Sciences].Google Scholar
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. D. (1982). Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1984). Classroom second language development. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1985). Teacher-pupil interaction in second language development. In Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. G. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 69–88). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition: Learning in the classroom. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1978). Some features of early child-adult dialogues. Language in Society, 7, 357–373.Google Scholar
Extra, G., & Vallen, T. (1988). Language and ethnic minorities in the Netherlands. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 73, 85–100.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Baby talk in six languages. American Anthropologist, 66, 2–10.Google Scholar
Gaies, S. J. (1977). The nature of linguistic input in formal second language learning: Linguistic and communicative strategies. In Brown, H., Yorio, C., & Crymes, R. (Eds.), On TESOL '77 (pp. 204–212). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1985). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. G. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149–161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hakansson, G. (1986). Quantitative studies of teacher talk. In Kasper, G. (Ed.), Learning, teaching and communication in the foreign language classroom (pp. 83–98). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In Hatch, E. (Ed.), Second language acquisition (pp. 401–435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kleifgen, J. A. (1985). Skilled variation in a kindergarten teacher's use of foreigner talk. In Gass, S. M. & Carolyn, G. M. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 59–68). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1985). State of the art on input in second language acquisition. In Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. G. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 433–444). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In Winitz, H. (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 259–278). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983). Linguistics and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177–193.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. G. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377–393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1990a). The least a second language theory needs to explain. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 649–666.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1990b). Maturational contraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers' questions. In Seliger, H. W. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268–286). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
McKay, S. L., & Freedman, S. W. (1990). Language minority education in Great Britain: A challenge to current U.S. policy. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 385–405.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1984). Second language acquisition in childhood: Vol 1. Preschool children. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1991). Methods in second language classroom-oriented research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 249–274.Google Scholar
Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). The role of group work in classroom second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 233–248.Google Scholar
Pica, T., & Long, M. H. (1986). The linguistic and conversational performance of experienced and inexperienced teachers. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 85–98). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737–758.Google Scholar
Schinke-Llano, L. A. (1983). Foreigner talk in content classrooms. In Seliger, H. W. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 146–165). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schinke-Llano, L. A. (1989). Early childhood bilingualism: In search of explanation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 223–240.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. W. (1977). Does practice make perfect? A study of interaction patterns and L2 competence. Language Learning, 27, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slimani, A. (1987). The teaching-learning relationship: Learning opportunities and learning outcomes, an Algerian case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1990). Introduction to a colloquium: The scope and form of a theory of second language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 609–616.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. G. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–256). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Teunissen, F. (1986). Een school, twee talen. Utrecht: Vakgroep Onderwijskunde.Google Scholar
Vallen, T., & Stijnen, S. (1991). Ethnic minorities and ethnic minority languages in Dutch primary schools: Problems and challenges. Language and Education, 5, 113–123.Google Scholar
Verhallen, M., Appel, R., & Schoonen, R. (1989). Language functions in early childhood education: The cognitive-linguistic experiences of bilingual and monolingual children. Language and Education, 3, 109–130.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (1987). Ethnic minority children acquiring literacy. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (1985). Ethnic group differences in children's oral proficiency of Dutch. In Extra, G. & Vallen, T. (Eds.), Ethnic minorities and Dutch as a second language (pp. 105–131). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of second-language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95–110.Google Scholar
Willig, A. (1985). A meta-analysis of selected studies on the effectiveness of bilingual education. Review of Educational Research, 55, 269–317.Google Scholar
Wong-Fillmore, L. (1982). Instructional language as linguistic input: Second language learning in classrooms. In Wilkinson, L. C. (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 283–296). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wong-Fillmore, L. (1985). When does teacher talk work as input? In Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. G. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 17–50). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar