Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:24:27.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT PROCESSES

Commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1997

Brian MacWhinney
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The relation between experimental psychology and second language acquisition research hasgone through at least two major swings of the pendulum. During the heyday of behaviorism, thependulum swung strongly toward psychology. The behaviorist psychologists advised us to thinkof language learning as nothing more than habit formation (Mowrer, 1960), and second languagelearning materials reflected an emphasis on repetition, drill, rewards, practice, and conditioning.During the early years of the cognitive revolution, Chomsky (1959) argued that viewing languageas a conditioned response (Skinner, 1957) ignores the complexities of both language structureand cognition. Persuaded by these arguments, second language researchers turned away frombehaviorist psychology and sought the explanation for language acquisition in universals oflanguage structure (Dulay & Burt, 1974).

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press