Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T05:11:37.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intonation and Language Learning: The Necessity for an Integrative Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Christoph Gutknecht
Christoph Gutknecht
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg, Seminar für Englische Sprache und Kultur
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The discrepancy between the goals and reality of applied linguistics as an integrative discipline can be recognized most clearly in the field of intonation, prosody, and para- and extra-linguistic phenomena, since the area covered by these phenomena intrudes into many disciplines (e.g., medicine, psychology, physics, musicology, phonetics, linguistics and pedagogy). It is generally agreed that these phenomena have to be regarded in their manifold interrelations. On the other hand there seems to be very little agreement among authors in their attempts to delimit and define these phenomena. The result is simply complete terminological confusion.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , Spring 1979, pp. 25 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abercombie, D. et al. (eds.) 1964. In Honour of Daniel Jones, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. B. and Corder, S.P. (eds.) 1974. Techniques in Applied Linguistics, The Edinburgh Course in Applied Linguistics 3, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. B. and Corder, S.P.. (eds.) 1975. Papers in Applied Linguistics, The Edinburgh Course in Applied Linguistics 2, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, G. 1974. “Practical Phonetics and Phonology”, in Allen and Corder (eds.).Google Scholar
Brown, G. 1975. “Phonological Theory and Language Teaching”, in Allen and Corder (eds.).Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English, London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. 1968. Active Intonation, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Esser, J. 1975. Intonationszeichen im Englischen, Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germer, E. 1977. “Zur Didaktik der englischen Intonation”, in Der fremdsprachliche Unterricht, 41. 40–49.Google Scholar
Gutknecht, C. (ed.) 1977. Grundbegriffe und Hauptströmungen der Linguistik, Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar
Gutknecht, C. (ed.) und Mackiewicz, W. 1977. “Prosodische, paralinguistische und intonatorische Phänomene im Englischen”, in Gutknecht (ed.).Google Scholar
Hadding-Koch, K. 1961. Acoustico-Phonetic Studies in the Intonation of Spoken Swedish, Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. A Course in Spoken English: Intonation, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hüllen, W. 1976. Linguistik und Englischunterricht 2: Didaktische Analysen, Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar
Kelz, H. P. 1977. “Problematik und Perspektiven der Ausspracheschulung”, in Der fremdsprachliche Unterricht 41. 2–5.Google Scholar
Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1975. A Communicative Grammar of English, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lipka, L. 1977. “Functional Sentence Perspective, Intonation and the Speaker”, in Gutknecht (ed.).Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. D. and Arnold, G. F. 1973. Intonation of Colloquial English, London: Longman. (2nd Ed.)Google Scholar
Uldall, E. 1964. “Dimensions of Meaning in Intonation”, in Abercombie et al. (eds.).Google Scholar
Wilkins, D.A. 1974. Linguistics in Language Teaching, London: Arnold. (2nd Ed.)Google Scholar