Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T15:41:03.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Binary evolution and observational constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

C. de Loore
C. de Loore*
Affiliation:
Astrophysical Institute, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, VUB, Brussels, Belgium and University of Antwerp, RUCA, Antwerp, Belgium

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The evolution of close binaries is discussed in connection with problems concerning mass and angular momentum losses. Theoretical and observational evidence for outflow of matter, leaving the system during evolution is given: statistics on total masses and mass ratios, effects of the accretion of the mass gaining component, the presence of streams, disks, rings, circumstellar envelopes, period changes, abundance changes in the atmosphere.

The effects of outflowing matter on the evolution is outlined, and estimates of the fraction of matter expelled by the loser, and leaving the system, are given. The various time scales involved with evolution and observation are compared. Examples of non conservative evolution are discussed.

Problems related to contact phases, on mass and energy losses, in connection with entropy changes are briefly analysed. For advanced stages the disruption probabilities for supernova explosions are examined. A global picture is given for the evolution of massive close binaries, from ZAMS, through WR phases, X-ray phases, leading to runaway pulsars or to a binary pulsar and later to a millisecond pulsar.

Information

Type
III. BINARITY, PULSATION, ROTATION AND MIXING
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 105: Observational Tests of the Stellar Evolution Theory , 1984, pp. 359 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1984 

References

Anderson, L., Raff, M., Shu, F.H.: 1980 in “Close Binary Stars: Observations and Interpretation”, IAU Symp. 88, eds. Plavec, M.J., Popper, D. M., Ulrich, R.K. Google Scholar
Appenzeller, I., Tscharnuter, W.: 1975, Astron. Astrophys. 40, 397.Google Scholar
Awadella, Budding, 1981.Google Scholar
Benson, R.S.: 1970, Ph. D. Thesis Univ. California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Biermann, P.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 10, 205.Google Scholar
Biermann, P., Thomas, H.-C.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys. 16, 60.Google Scholar
Binnendijk, L.: 1970, Vistas in Astron. 12, 217.Google Scholar
Conti, P.S.: 1982 in “Wolf-Rayet Stars: Observations, Physics, Evolution” eds. de Loore, C. and Willis, A. Google Scholar
De Cuyper, J.P.: 1982, in “Binary and Multiple Stars as Tracers of Stellar Evolution” IAU Coll. 69, eds. Kopal, Z. and Rahe, J. Google Scholar
Doom, C., de Loore, C.: 1984, Astrophys. J. in press.Google Scholar
Eggen, O.J., Roy, Ols. Bull. 31, 101.Google Scholar
Eggen, O.J.: 1967, Mem. Roy. Astron. Soc. 70, 111.Google Scholar
Firmani, C.: Bisiacchi, F.: 1980, Proc. 5th. IAU Regional Meeting, Liège Belgium.Google Scholar
Flannery, B.P.: 1975a, Mon. Nat. Roy. Astron. Soc. 170, 325.Google Scholar
Flannery, B.P.: 1975b, Astrophys. J. 201, 661.Google Scholar
Flannery, B.P., Ulrich, R.K., 1977, Astrophys. J. 212, 533.Google Scholar
Gianuzzi, M.A.: 1981, Astron. Astrophys. 103, 111.Google Scholar
Guinan, E.F., Tomczyck, S.: 1979, Inform. Bull. Var. Stars, 1623.Google Scholar
Hazlehurst, J.: 1970, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 149, 129.Google Scholar
Hellings, P.: 1983a, Astrophys. Space Sci. in press.Google Scholar
Hellings, P.: 1983b, Astrophys. Space Sci. submitted.Google Scholar
Hellings, P., Vansina, F., Packet, W., Doom, C., De Grève, J.P., de Loore, C.: 1982 in IAU Symp. 99 “Wolf-Rayet Stars: Observations Physics, Evolution” eds. de Loore, C. and Willis, A., p. 397.Google Scholar
Henrichs, H.F., van den Heuvel, F.P.J.: 1983, Nature, Vol. 303.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J., Ostriker, J.P., Petterson, J.A.: 1980, Astron. Astrophys. 81, L7.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E.P.J., de Loore, C.: 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 25, 387.Google Scholar
Huang, S.: 1963: Astrophys. J. 138, 342.Google Scholar
Kippenhahn, R., Meyer-Hofmeister, E.: 1977, Astron. Astrophys. 54, 539.Google Scholar
Kondo, Y., Mc. Cluskey, G.E., Stencel, R.E.: 1980 in “Close Binary Stars: Observations and Interpretation, IAU Symp. 88 eds. Plavec, M.J., Popper, D.M., Ulrich, R.K., p. 237.Google Scholar
Kuiper, G.P.: 1941, Astrophys. J. 93, 133.Google Scholar
Kurdtizki, R.P., Simon, K.P., Hamann, W.R.: 1983, Astron. Astrophys. 118, 245.Google Scholar
Kurdtizki, R.P., Simon, P.K., Lynas-Gray, A.E., Kilkenny, D., Hill, P.W.: 1982, Astron. Astrophys. 106, 245.Google Scholar
Larson, R.B.: 1969, Mon. Not. Roy, Astron. Soc. 145, 271.Google Scholar
Larson, R.B.: 1972, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 157, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K.C., Schneider, D.P.: 1979, in “Mass Loss and Evolution of O-type Stars”, IAU Symp. 83, eds. Conti, P.S. and de Loore, C., p. 265 Google Scholar
de Loore, C.: 1983, in “Double Stars, Physical Properties and Genetic Relations”, IAU Coll. 80, ed. Kopal, Z. Google Scholar
de Loore, C., De Grève, J.P., De Cuyper, J.P.: 1975, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana 45, 893.Google Scholar
Lubow, S.H., Shu, F.H.: 1975, Astrophys. J.: 198, 383.Google Scholar
Lubow, S.H., Shu, F.H.: 1976, Astrophys. J. Letters 207, L53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, L.B.: 1976, Astrophys. J. 205, 208.Google Scholar
Lucy, L.B.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 151, 1123.Google Scholar
Massey, P.: 1982, in “Wolf-Rayet Stars: Observations, Physics, Evolution IAU Symp. 99, eds. de Loore, C. and Willis, A., p. 251.Google Scholar
Meyer, F., Meyer-Hofmeister, E.: 1980 in “Close Binary Stars: Observation and Interpretation” IAU Symp. 88, eds. Plavec, M.J., Popper, D.M., Ulrich, R.K., p. 145.Google Scholar
Neo, S., Miyaji, S., Nomoto, K., Sugimoto, D.: Publ. Astron. Soc., Japan 29, 249.Google Scholar
Osaki, Y.: 1965, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan, 17, 97.Google Scholar
Packet, W.: 1983, preprint.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B.: 1971, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 9, 183.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B.: 1980, Astron. Astrophys. 82, 349.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B., Ziolkowski, J.: 1967, Acta Astron. 17, 7.Google Scholar
Plavec, M.J., Koch, R.H.: 1978, Inform. Bull. Var. Stars, No 1482.Google Scholar
Plavec, M.J.: 1981, in “Effects of Mass Loss on Stellar Evolution”, eds. Chiosi, C. and Stalio, R. Google Scholar
Plavec, M.J., Ulrich, R.K., Polidan, R.S.: 1973, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific, 85, 508.Google Scholar
Plavec, P.J.: 1983, Astrophys. J. Submitted.Google Scholar
Plavec, M.J., Sehnal, L., Mikulas, J.: 1964, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czeck 15, 171.Google Scholar
Plavec, M.J., Weiland, J.L., Koch, R.H.: 1981, Astrophys. J. Google Scholar
Plavec, M.J.: Kriz, S.: 1965, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czeck. 16, 297.Google Scholar
Polidan, R.S., Peters, G.J.: 1980 in “Close Binaries: Observations and Interpretations” eds. Plavec, M.J., Popper, D.M., Ulrich, R.K., p. 203.Google Scholar
Popper, D.M.: 1980a in “Close Binaries: Observations and Interpretations” eds. Plavec, M.J., Popper, D.M., Ulrich, R.K., p. 203.Google Scholar
Popper, D.M.: 1980b, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 18, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, K.H.: 1960, Astrophys. J. 132, 162.Google Scholar
Prendergast, K.H., Taam, R.E.: 1974, Astrophys. J. 189, 125.Google Scholar
Robinson, E.L.: 1976, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 14, 119.Google Scholar
Rucinski, S.M.: 1974, Acta Astron. 24, 119.Google Scholar
Rucinski, S.M.: 1978 in “Non stationary Evolution of Close Binaries” ed. Zytkow, A., p. 117.Google Scholar
Schlovski, I.S.: 1981, Proc. 5th. IAU Reg. Meeting, Liège, Belgium.Google Scholar
Shu, F.H.: 1980 in “Close Binary Stars: Observations and Interpretations” IAU Symp. 88, eds. Plavec, M.J., Popper, D.M., Ulrich, R.K., p.477.Google Scholar
Shu, F.H., Lubow, S.H.: 1981 in Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. p. 277.Google Scholar
Shu, F.H., Lubow, S.H., Anderson, L.: 1976, Astrophys. J. 209, 536.Google Scholar
Sobouti, Y.: 1970, Astron. Astrophys. 5, 149.Google Scholar
Stahler, S.W., Shu, F.H., Taam, R.E.: 1980a, Astrophys. J. 241, 637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahler, S.W., Shu, F.H., Taam, R.E.: 1980b, Astrophys. J. 242, 226.Google Scholar
Stencel, R.E., Kondo, Y., Bernat, A.P., Mc. Clusky, G.: 1980 in “Close Binary Stars: Observations and Interpretation”, IAU Symp. No. 88 eds, Plavec, M. J., Popper, D. M., Ulrich, R. K., p. 555.Google Scholar
Struve, O., Sahade, J.: 1957, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 69, 41.Google Scholar
Vanbeveren, D., De Grève, J.P., van Dessel, E.L., de Loore, C.: 1979, Astron. Astrophys. 73, 19.Google Scholar
Vanbeveren, D., de Loore, C.: 1980, Astron. Astrophys. 86, 21.Google Scholar
Warner, B.: 1976, Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems, IAU Symp. 73, eds. Mitton, S. Whelan, J., p. 85.Google Scholar
Webbinck, R.F.: 1979, IAU Coll. 49 “Changing trends in variable star Research”, eds. Bateson, F.M., Smak, J., Urch, I.H., p. 102.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.E.: 1974, Astrophys. J. 189, 319.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.E.: 1979, Astrophys. J. 234, 1054.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.E.: 1981, Astrophys. J. 251.Google Scholar
Winkler, K.H., Newman, M.J.: 1980a, Astrophys. J. 236, 201.Google Scholar
Winkler, K.H., Newman, M.J.: 1980b, Astrophys. J. 238, 311.Google Scholar
Yungelson, L.R.: 1973, Nauch. Inf. 27, 93.Google Scholar