Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T01:20:23.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parameters of massive OB stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Artemio Herrero
Artemio Herrero*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/ Vía Láctea s/n, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, España

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

I review our knowledge about effective temperatures and masses of massive OB stars paying special attention to results recently obtained using new atmospheric models including sphericity, mass-loss and line-blanketing. The new temperature scales for O dwarfs and supergiants are lower than previously accepted. No systematic mass discrepancy is found among O supergiants, although individual problematic cases still remain. It is shown that model atmospheres give answers consistent with binary systems. Good agreement is found between theoretical predictions and observations of the Wind Momentum-Luminosity relationship for Galactic O-type supergiants. Finally, I review the status of the WLR in M33.

Information

Type
Part 1. Atmospheres of Massive Stars
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 212: A Massive Star Odyssey: From Main Sequence to Supernova , 2003, pp. 3 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2003 

References

Bianchi, L., García, M. 2002, ApJ 581, 610.Google Scholar
Burkholder, V., Massey, P., Morrell, N. 1997, ApJ 490, 328.Google Scholar
Chlebowski, T. Garmany, C.D. 1991, ApJ 368, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, P.A. Bohannan, B. 1997, A&A 317, 532.Google Scholar
Crowther, P.A., Hillier, D.J., Evans, C.J., et al. 2002, ApJ 579, 774.Google Scholar
Gabler, R., Gabler, A., Kudritzki, R.-P., et al. 1989, A&A 226, 162.Google Scholar
Gies, D.R., Penny, L.R., Mayer, P., Drechesel, H., Lorentz, R. 2002, ApJ 574, 957.Google Scholar
Harries, T.J., Hilditch, R.W., Hill, G. 1998, MNRAS 295, 386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrero, A., Kudritzki, R.-P., Vílchez, J.M., et al. 1992, A&A 261, 209.Google Scholar
Herrero, A., Kudritzki, R.-P., Gabler, R., et al. 1995, A&A 297, 556.Google Scholar
Herrero, A., Puls, J., Villamariz, M.R. 2000, A&A 354, 193.Google Scholar
Herrero, A., Puls, J., Najarro, F. 2002, A&A 396, 949.Google Scholar
Hillier, D.J. Miller, D.L. 1998, ApJ 496, 407.Google Scholar
Howarth, I.D., Siebert, K.W., Hussain, G.A.J., Prinja, R.K. 1997, MNRAS 284, 265.Google Scholar
Hubeny, I., Lanz, T. 1995, ApJ 439, 875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Koter, A., Lamers, H., Schmutz, W. 1996, A&A 306, 501.Google Scholar
Kudritzki, R.-P., Puls, J., Lennon, D.J., et al. 1999, A&A 350, 970.Google Scholar
Kudritzki, R.-P. Puls, J. 2000, Ann. Review Astron. Astrophys. 38, 613.Google Scholar
Lamers, H., Leitherer, C. 1993, ApJ 412, 771.Google Scholar
Martins, F., Schaerer, D., Hillier, D.J. 2002, A&A 382, 999.Google Scholar
Pauldrach, A.W.A., Hoffmann, T.L., Lennon, M. 2001, A&A 375, 161; Erratum 2002, A&A 395, 611.Google Scholar
Penny, L.R. 1996, ApJ 463, 737.Google Scholar
Penny, L.R., Seyle, D., Gies, D.R., et al. 2001, ApJ 548, 889.Google Scholar
Puls, J. 2002, in preparation.Google Scholar
Puls, J., Kudritzki, R.-P., Herrero, A., et al. 1996, A&A 305, 171.Google Scholar
Ribas, I., Jordi, C., Torra, J., Giménez, A. 2000, MNRAS 313, 99.Google Scholar
Santolaya-Rey, A.E., Puls, J., Herrero, A. 1997, A&A 323, 488.Google Scholar
Schaerer, D. Schmutz, W. 1994, A&A 288, 231.Google Scholar
Taresch, G., Kudritzki, R.-P., Hurwitz, M., et al. 1997, A&A 321, 531.Google Scholar
Vacca, W.D., Garmany, C.D., Shull, J.M. 1996, ApJ 460, 914.Google Scholar
Vink, J.S., de Koter, A., Lamers, H. 2000, A&A 362, 295.Google Scholar
Walborn, N.R. 2002, AJ 124, 507.Google Scholar