Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T12:24:17.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physical Interactions Between Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Jeremiah P. Ostriker
Jeremiah P. Ostriker*
Affiliation:
Princeton University Observatory, Princeton, New Jersey 08544 USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Physical arguments are presented to show that two-body, tidal-capture binaries should form in abundance (Nb ~ 103) during the evolution of globular clusters by the time that core collapse begins. Interactions amongst these binaries and with core single stars will cause ejections from the cluster which pump energy into the system producing a bounce and re-expansion. Detailed numerical Fokker-Planck evolutionary calculations presented here confirm this scenario and indicate that this process is likely to be the dominant energy input for most clusters. During the re-expansion phase rcore ∝ t1/3, rhalf ∝ t2/3 with the core containing several hundred very close binary star systems.

Information

Type
May 31: External Fields and Finite-Star-Size Effects
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 113: Dynamic of Stars Clusters , 1985, pp. 347 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1985 

References

Alexander, M. E. and Budding, E. 1979, Astron. & Astroph., 73, 227.Google Scholar
Cohn, H. 1980, Ap. J. 242, 765.Google Scholar
Djorgovski, S. 1985 (this conference).Google Scholar
Djorgovski, S. and King, I. R. 1984, Ap. J. (Lett.), 277, L49.Google Scholar
Dokuchaev, V. I. and Ozernoy, L. M. 1982, Astron. & Astroph., 111, 16.Google Scholar
Fabian, A. C., Pringle, J. E. and Rees, M. 1975, Monthly Notices, Roy. Astron. Soc., 172 15P.Google Scholar
Goodman, J. 1984, Ap. J., 280, 298.Google Scholar
Grindlay, J. 1985 (this conference).Google Scholar
Henon, M. 1961, Ann. Astrophy., 24, 369.Google Scholar
Hut, P. 1984, Ap. J. (Suppl.), 55, 301.Google Scholar
Hut, P. 1985 (this conference).Google Scholar
Hut, P., Goodman, J. J., and Cohn, H. 1984, in preparation.Google Scholar
Inagaki, S. 1984a, M.N.R.A.S., in press.Google Scholar
Inagaki, S. 1984b, preprint.Google Scholar
Krolik, J. H. 1983, Nature, 305, 506.Google Scholar
Lightman, A. P. and Fall, S. M. 1978, Ap. J. 221, 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D. L. and Eggleton, P. 1980, Monthly Notices, Roy. Astron. Soc., 191, 483.Google Scholar
Mikkola, S. 1983, Monthly Notices, Roy. Astron. Soc., 203, 1107.Google Scholar
Milgrom, M. and Shapiro, S. L. 1978, Ap. J. 223, 991.Google Scholar
Ozernoy, L. M. and Dokuchaev, V. I. 1982, Astron. & Astroph., 111, 1.Google Scholar
Press, W. H. and Teukolsky, S. A. 1977, Ap. J. 213, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L. and Mathieu, R. D. 1980, Ap. J. 241, 618.Google Scholar
Statler, T. S., Ostriker, J. P., and Cohn, H. 1984, in preparation.Google Scholar
Stodolkiewicz, J. S. 1985 (this conference).Google Scholar