Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T16:29:16.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relation between stellar evolution and cosmology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

R. J. Tayler
R. J. Tayler*
Affiliation:
Astronomy Centre, University of Sussex, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Observations of star clusters combined with the theory of stellar evolution enable us to estimate the ages of stars while cosmological observations and theories give us a value for the age of the Universe. This is the most important interaction between cosmology and stellar evolution because it is clearly necessary that stars are younger than the Universe. Stellar evolution also plays an important rôle in relating the present chemical composition of the Universe to its original composition.

Information

Type
IV. RELATION WITH CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF GALAXIES AND COSMOLOGY
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 105: Observational Tests of the Stellar Evolution Theory , 1984, pp. 549 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1984 

References

Bukhari, F. A.: 1983, M Sc Dissertation, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Cannon, R. D.: 1983, Highlights of Astronomy, 6, pp 109–117.Google Scholar
Carney, B. W.: 1980, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 42, pp 481–500.Google Scholar
Carr, B. J., Bond, J. R. and Arnett, W. D.: 1984, Astrophys. J. in press.Google Scholar
de Vaucouleurs, G.: 1983, Astrophys. J. 268, pp 468–475.Google Scholar
Demarque, P. R. and McClure, R. D.: 1977, In The Evolution of Galaxies and Stellar Populations , eds Tinsley, B. M. and Larson, R. B., Yale University Observatory, pp 199–215.Google Scholar
Flannery, B. P. and Johnson, B. C.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 263, pp 166–186.Google Scholar
Guth, A. H.: 1981, Phys. Rev. D, 23, pp 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoessel, J. G., Gunn, J. E. and Thuan, T. X.: 1980, Astrophys. J. 241, pp 486–492.Google Scholar
Hogan, C. J.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 252, pp 418–432.Google Scholar
Janes, K. and Demarque, P. R.: 1983, Astrophys. J. 264, pp 206–214.Google Scholar
Kristian, J., Sandage, A. and Westphal, J. A.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 221, pp 383–394.Google Scholar
Kunth, D. and Sargent, W. L. W.: 1983, Astrophys. J. 273, pp 81–98.Google Scholar
Pagel, B. E. J.: 1982, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (Lond.) A, 307, pp 19–34.Google Scholar
Saio, H., Shibata, Y. and Simoda, M.: 1977, Astrophys. Space Sci. 47, pp 151–162.Google Scholar
Sandage, A.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 252, pp 553–573.Google Scholar
Sandage, A.: 1983, Astron. J. 88, pp 1159–1165.Google Scholar
Stringfellow, G. S., Bodenheimer, P., Noerdlinger, P. D. and Arigo, R. J.: 1983, Astrophys. J. 264, pp 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, R. J.: 1982, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (Lond.) A, 307, pp 3–17.Google Scholar
Tytler, D.: 1981, Nature, 291, pp 289–292.Google Scholar
van Albada, T. S., Dickens, R. J. and Wevers, B. M. H. R.: 1981. Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 196, pp 823–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberg, D. A.: 1983, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 51, pp 29–65.Google Scholar