Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T18:08:51.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diatoms and Forensic Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Benjamin P. Horton
Benjamin P. Horton*
Affiliation:
Sea Level Research Laboratory Department of Earth and Environmental Science University of Pennsylvania 240 South 33rd Street Philadelphia, PA 19104-6316
Get access

Abstract

The application of diatom analysis in determining whether drowning was the cause of death has proved to be a valuable tool in forensic science. The basic principal of the “diatom test” in drowning is based on inference that diatoms are present in the medium where the possible drowning took place and that the inhalation of water causes penetration of diatoms into the alveolar system and blood stream, and thus, their deposition into the brain, kidneys, and other organs.

I provide an informal assessment of “reliability” of the “diatom test” through correlations between control samples and samples from organs and clothing in two case studies. In studies, all organ and clothing samples except one had matching analogues in the modern diatom dataset from the body recovery sites, reinforcing drowning as the cause of death. The analogue matching provides further information on the precise site of drowning, in particular differentiating between drowning in a bathtub versus a naturally occurring body of water.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 13: Pond Scum to Carbon Sink: Geological and Environmental Applications of the Diatoms , October 2007, pp. 181 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © by the Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Birks, H. J. B. 1986. Numerical zonation, comparison and correlation of Quaternary pollen-stratigraphical data, p. 743–773. In Berglund, B. E. (ed.), Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, London.Google Scholar
Birks, H. J. B. 1995. Quantitative palaeoenvironmental reconstructions, p. 161–236. In Maddy, D. and Brew, J (eds.) Statistical modelling of Quaternary science data, Cambridge: Quaternary Res Association.Google Scholar
Ter Braak, C. and Smilauer, P. 1997–2003. Canoco for Windows, Version 4.51.Google Scholar
Cameron, N. G. 2004. The use of diatom analysis in forensic geoscience, 277–280. In Pye, K. and Croft, D. J. (eds.), Forensic Geoscience: Principles, Techniques and Applications. London: Geological Society, 232.Google Scholar
Dayan, A., Morgan, R., Trefty, R., and Paddock, T. 1978. Naturally occurring diatomaceous pneumoconiosis in sub-human primates, Journal of Comparative Pathology, 88: 321–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimm, E. C. 2004. Tilia View: version 2.0.2. Research and Collections Center, Illinois State Museum.Google Scholar
Hartley, B. 1996. An Atlas of British diatoms. Bristol, Biopress Ltd. Google Scholar
Horton, B. P., and Edwards, R. J. 2006. Quantifying Holocene Sea Level Change Using Intertidal Foraminifera: Lessons from the British Isles. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication, 40, 97 p.Google Scholar
Horton, B. P., Boreham, S., and Hillier, C. 2006. The Development and Application of a Diatom-Based Quantitative Reconstruction Technique in Forensic Science. Journal of Forensic Science, 51:643–650.Google Scholar
Juggins, S. 2004. C2, Version 1.4.Google Scholar
Krstic, S., Duma, A., Janevska, B., Levkov, Z., Nikolova, K., and Noveska, M. 2002. Diatoms in forensic expertise of drowning – a Macedonian experience. Forensic Science International 127: 198–203.Google Scholar
Murray, R. 2004. Evidence from the Earth: Forensic geology and criminal investigation. Missoula, MT, Mountain Press, 218 p;Google Scholar
Murray, R., and Tedrow, J. 1975. Forensic geology: Earth sciences and criminal investigation. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press, 240 p.Google Scholar
Peabody, A. J. 1980. Diatoms and drowning – a review. Medical Science Law, 20: 254–261.Google Scholar
Peabody, A. J. 1999. Forensic Science and Diatoms, 413–418. In Stoermer, E. F. and Smol, J. P. (eds.), The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peabody, A. J., and Burgess, R. M. 1984. Diatoms in the diagnosis of death by drowning, 537–541. In Mann, D. G. (ed.), Proceeding of the Seventh International Diatom Symposium. Koenigstein, Otto Koeltz.Google Scholar
Pollanen, M. S. 1998. Diatoms and homicide. Forensic Science International, 91: 29–34.Google Scholar
Pollanen, M. S., Cheung, L., and Chaisson, D. A. 1997. The diagnostic value of the diatom tests for drowning. I. Utility: a retrospective analysis of 771 cases of drowning in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Forensic Science, 42: 281–285.Google Scholar
Pye, K., and Croft, D. J. 2004. Forensic Geoscience: Principles, Techniques and Applications. London, Geological Society, 232: 318 p.Google Scholar
Ruffell, A. 2006. Forensic Geoscience. Geology Today, 22: 68–70.Google Scholar
Ruffell, A., and McKinley, J. 2005. Forensic Geoscience: applications of geology, geomorphology & geophysics to criminal investigations. Earth Science Reviews, 69: 235–247.Google Scholar
Saferstein, R. 2001. Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall. 434 p.Google Scholar
Schneider, V. 1980. Detection of diatoms in the bone marrow of non-drowning victims. Zeitschrift fur Rechtsmedizin, 85: 315–317.Google Scholar
Sidari, L., Di Nunno, N., Costantinides, F., and Melato, M. 1999. Diatom tests with Soluene-350 to diagnose drowning in sea water. Forensic Science International, 103: 61–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siver, P.A., Lord, W. D., and McCarthy, D. J. A. 1994. Forensic Limnology: The Use of Freshwater Algal Community Ecology to Link Suspects to an Aquatic Crime Scene in Southern New England. Journal of Forensic Science, 39: 847–853.Google Scholar
Timperman, J. 1972. The diagnosis of drowning–a review. Forensic Science, 1: 397–409.Google Scholar
Van Der Werff, H., and Huls, H. 1958–1974. Diatomeenflora van Nederland. The Netherlands: published privately by Van der Werff, de Hoef (U).Google Scholar
White, P. 2004. Crime Scene to Court: The Essentials of Forensic Science. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England, 451 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zong, Y., and Horton, B. P. 1998. Diatom zones across intertidal flats and coastal saltmarshes in Britain. Diatom Research, 13: 375–94.Google Scholar
Zong, Y., and Horton, B. P. 1999. Diatom-based tidal-level transfer functions as an aid in reconstructing Quaternary history of sea-level movements in Britain. Journal of Quaternary Science, 14: 153–67.Google Scholar