Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T05:46:43.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpreting Paleoenvironments with Microfossils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Stephen J. Culver
Stephen J. Culver*
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology The Natural History Museum Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, U.K.
Get access

Extract

One of the basic tenets of geology is the present is the key to the past. In the present context, this simply means that if we document the distribution of organisms today and have some degree of understanding of what combination of environmental variables controls those distributions, then we can use this information to reconstruct past environments by using the fossilized representatives of the modern organisms as paleoenvironmental indicators. This classic use of microfossils, along with biostratigraphy, is of great significance in the search for oil and gas.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Papers , Volume 2: Learning from the Fossil Record , October 1996, pp. 283 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Useful References

Culver, S. J. 1987. Foraminifera, p. 169–212. In Broadhead, T. W. (ed.), Fossil Prokaryotes and Protists. Notes for a Short Course, University of Tennessee, Department of Geological Sciences, Studies in Geology 18.Google Scholar
Douglas, R. G. 1979. Benthic foraminiferal ecology and paleoecology, a review of concepts and methods, p. 21–53. In Lipps, J. H., Berger, W. H., Buzas, M. A., Douglas, R. G. and Ross, C.A., Foraminiferal Ecology and Paleoecology, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Short Course 6.Google Scholar
Gibson, T. and Buzas, M. A. 1973. Species diversity: patterns in modern and Miocene foraminifera of the eastern margin of North America. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 84: 217–238.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, T. G. 1989. Planktonic-benthonic foraminiferal ratios: modern patterns and Tertiary applications. Marine Micropalaeontology, 15: 29–52.Google Scholar
Haynes, J. 1981. Foraminifera. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 433 p.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. Jr. and Tappan, H. 1964. Sarcodina chiefly Thecamoebians and Foraminifera. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part C Volumes 1 and 2. University of Kansas Press and Geological Society of America, Lawrence, Kansas and Boulder, Colorado, 900 p.Google Scholar
Murray, J. W. 1974. Distribution and Ecology of Living Benthic Foraminiferids, Heinemann Educational Books, London, 274 p.Google Scholar
Snyder, S. W. 1988. Micropalaeontology of Miocene sediments in the shallow subsurface of Onslow Bay, North Carolina continental shelf. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication, 25: 1–189.Google Scholar