¹ Otte, J. K., ed., Alfred of Sareshel's Commentary on the Metheora of Aristotle (Diss. University of Southern California, 1969 ). The commentary has survived in four known manuscripts, the first of which was discovered by George Lacombe in 1935, ‘Alfredus in Metheora,’ Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters, Suppl. III (Münster 1935) 463–71. My edition was published as: Alfred of Sareshel's Commentary on the Metheora of Aristotle (Leiden-Cologne 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

² Grabmann, M., Forschungen über die lateinischen Aristotelesübersetzungen des XIII. Jahrhunderts (Beiträge sur Geschichte der Philosophic des Mittelalters 17, Münster 1916) 177, gives the Arabic-Latin and Greek-Latin incipits of the De generatione et corruptione which in Vienna, Nationalbibliothek, Cod. lat. 2318, fols. 113^r-136 ^v, appear in parallel columns, on the left the Arabic: ‘Oportet nos determinare …’ and on the right the Greek: ‘De generatione et corruptione… .’ The Arabic-Latin version is by Gerard of Cremona.Google Scholar

³ Lacombe, G., ed., Aristoteles latinus Codices I (Rome 1939) 237–38: ‘Liber Aristotilis translatus ab Henrico Aristippo de greco in latinum, correctus et per capitula distinctus a Magistro Alvredo de Sares<hel> secundum commentum Alkindi super eundem librum.’+secundum+commentum+Alkindi+super+eundem+librum.’>Google Scholar

⁴ Minio-Paluello, L., ‘Henri Aristippe, Guillaume de Moerbeke et les traductions latines médiévales des Météorologiques et du De generatione et corruptione d'Aristote,’ Revue philosophique de Louvain 45 (1947) 206–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ P. 225: ‘fin du xii ^e siècle, … les leçons … écrites de la měme main que le texte.’Google Scholar

⁶ Minio-Paluello, L., ‘Jacobus Veneticus Grecus: Canonist and Translator of Aristotle,' Traditio 8 (1952) 265–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷ P. 279, n. 28, Minio-Paluello promised to ‘show somewhere else that all these [i.e., Ethica vetus, Ethica nova, Ethica Borghesiana] are parts of one (complete?) translation of the Nicomachean Ethics made in the twelfth century by the same scholar who translated the De Generatione et Corruptione… .’ Google Scholar

⁸ Grabmann, M., Mittelalterliches Geistesleben (3 vols., Munich 1926-56) III 86.Google Scholar

⁹ Birkenmajer, A., ‘Le role joué par les médecins et les naturalistes dans la réception d 'Aristote aux xii ^e et xiii ^e siècles,’ La Pologne au Congrès international d'Oslo, 1929 (Warsaw 1930) 5.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Callus, D. A., ‘The Introduction of Aristotelian Learning at Oxford,' Proceedings of the British Academy 29 (1943) 234.Google Scholar

¹¹ Madan, F. and Craster, H. H. E., A Summary Catalogue of Western Manuscripts in the Bodleian Library at Oxford II/1 (Oxford 1922 ); Craster, H. H. E. and Lacombe, G., cited in Grabmann, Geistesleben III 86; Aristoteles latinus Codices III 398–99 no. 340; and of course, Minio-Paluello, art. cit.Google Scholar

¹² There is one marginal note which appears to have been written at a later time and by a different hand; the letters are both larger and appear more cursive than the rest; see fol. 57 ^r.Google Scholar

¹³ James Shiel encountering similar reference signs in ‘Boethius’ Commentaries on Aristotle,’ in: Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence (ed. Sorabji, Sorabji, Ithaca NY 1990) 349–72 at 365 n. 57, writes: ‘All the indications are that the Aristotelian text, and its marginal scholia, and their reference signs, were all at once taken from the Greek, by the same translator… .’Google Scholar

¹⁴ Dales, R. C., ed. and tr., Marius: On the Elements (Los Angeles CA 1976) 99:24. Marius calls them diminutissimis particulis.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Thomas Aquinas, S., In Aristotelis libros De caelo et mundo, De generatione et corruptione, et Meteorologicorum Expositio (ed. Spiazzi, R. M., Turin-Rome 1952) passim.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Otte, , Metheora 54.7: ‘… patet quod quatuor tantum sunt elementa, ex libro De generatione et corruptione, ubi tantum quatuor esse elementa probavit, athomos nichil esse ostendens, et eorum sententiam qui litem et amicitiam numero elementorum adnumerabant, fucans.’Google Scholar

¹⁷ Plato, , Timaeus (ed. Lee, H. D. P., Baltimore 1965) 73–78. Of these figures four are composed exclusively of triangles. Serving as Plato's ‘building blocks,’ they represent also the four elements — earth: hexahedron; water: icosahedron; air: octahedron; fire: tetrahedron. The dodecahedron cannot be constructed from the basic triangles, but its volume approaches the sphere most closely and Plato associated it in the Timaeus with the whole (spherical) heaven, while in the Phaedo (110b) it is associated with the spherical earth. Confer Plato, Timaeus (ed. Waszink, J. H., London-Leiden 1962).Google Scholar

¹⁸ Aristoteles latinus, Supplementa altera (Bruges-Paris 1961) 41–42.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Aristoteles latinus, IX 1 De generatione et corruptione, Translatio vetus (ed. Judycka, Judycka; Leiden 1986) xl note 33: ‘Certaines de ces notes se retrouvent en partie dans le commentaire de Jean Philopon.’ Cf. Joannis Philoponi In Aristotelis libros De generatione et corruptione commentaria (ed. Vitelli, H.; Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 14, Berlin 1847): scholie de 320a8 cf. Philopon, p. 70, 27-29, p. 71, 3-22, p. 72, 15-18; scholie de 321b20-23 cf. Philopon, p. 112, 11-13, p. 113, 1; scholie de 325b28 cf. Philopon, p. 162, 18-19; scholie de 335a28 cf. Philopon, p. 283, 10-15.Google Scholar

²⁰ Judycka, , De generatione et corruptione xli: ‘Mais le commentateur ajoute également le nom d'Anaximandre (par rapport aux passages 329a8 et 332a20-55 ^r, 57 ^v) et celui de Melissus (par rapport aux passages 325a2 et 6-51 ^v), à l'endroit où Aristote se réfère à leurs doctrines sans les nommer.’Google Scholar

²¹ Judycka, , De generatione et corruptione xli: ‘Le glossateur mentionne des ouvrages d'Aristote là où le Stagirite ne les cite pas expressément; il signale les traités auxquels le Stagirite renvoie, p. ex. 315b31 [ut in aliis diximus] in de celo (42^r); 329a27 [in aliis] in primo acraseos [sic] (55^r); 334a 15 [alterius opus est contemplationis] in de anima (59^v); 336a13 [prius dictum est] in fisica acroasi (61 ^v).’Google Scholar

²² Judycka, , De generatione et corruptione xli, ‘Toutes ces références se lisent dans le commentaire de Philopon. Cf. Vitelli, ed., Joannis Philoponi (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, 14): scholie de 315b31 Philoponus, p. 26, 5; scholie 329a27 Philoponus, p. 210, 24; scholie 334a15 Philoponus, p. 268, 30; scholie 336a13 Philoponus, p. 288, 15.’Google Scholar

²³ Leff, G., Medieval Thought (Baltimore 1965) 145: ‘One of the first among those thinkers most influential upon the development of Aristotelian and Greek thought in Islam was Alkindi.’Google Scholar

²⁴ Minio-Paluello, , ‘Iacobus Veneticus’ 292.Google Scholar

²⁵ Leff, , Medieval Thought 174.Google Scholar

²⁶ Minio-Paluello, , ‘Iacobus Veneticus’ 294.Google Scholar

²⁷ Haskins, C. H., The Renaissance of the Twelfth Century (6th ed., Cambridge MA 1976) 356: By 1159, John of Salisbury, whose humane philosophy, moderatrix omnium, is the ripe product of the older type of balanced culture, is protesting in vain against the neglect of classical learning in favor of the newer studies and against the ‘Cornifician’ masters who offer practical short cuts in education.Google Scholar

²⁸ Avicenna, , De congelatione et conglutinatione lapidum, being sections of the Kitab al-Shifa (edd. Holmyard, E. J. and Mandeville, D., Paris 1927) 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁹ Otte, , Metheora 31–3.Google Scholar

³⁰ Omont, H., ‘Recherches sur la Bibliothèque de l 'église cathédrale de Beauvais,’ Mémoires de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres 40 (Paris 1916) 48, no. 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³¹ Lacombe, G., ‘Alfredus in Metheora,’ (supra n. 1) 464. Cf. Aristoteles Latinus I 238: Liber Aristotelis translatus ab Henrico Aristippo de greco in latinum, correctus et per capitula distinctus a magistro Alvredo de Sares〈hel〉, secundum commentum Alkindi super eundem librum.Google Scholar

³² Otte, , Metheora 13, 49: 5: Quare autem vapor et calor invisibiles flammam visibilem producant, in libro De generatione et corruptione discussimus.Google Scholar

³³ Ibid. Google Scholar

³⁴ Judycka, , De generatione et corruptione 49 (328a20): ‘Hec quidem igitur convertuntur, quorum eadem materia est, et activa invicem et passiva ab invicem, hec autem faciunt impassibilia entia, quorum non eadem materia.’ The text is the same in the Oxford version, Bodleian Library, MS Selden supra 24 fol. 54 ^r: 17–18. The English text was taken from Aristotle, On Coming-to-be and Passing-away (ed. E. S. Forster; London 1965) 259 (328a20). Cf. The Works of Aristotle II (ed. Ross, W. D.; Oxford 1970): De generatione et corruptione 110 (328a20).Google Scholar

³⁵ Hidden in the left margin of Oxford, Bodleian, Selden supra 24 folio 54 ^r at line 17, the following loss is found: ‘Hoc facet enim album in nigro et pacitur.’Google Scholar

³⁶ Baeumker, C., ‘Die Stellung des Alfred von Sareshel (Alfredus Anglicus) und seiner Schrift De motu cordis in der Wissenschaft des beginnenden XIII. Jahrhunderts,’ Sb. Akad. München 9 (1913) 33.Google Scholar

OtteJames K.