Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T10:39:43.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chaucer and the Latin Muses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2016

Paul Beekman Taylor
Affiliation:
Universite de Geneve
Sophie Bordier
Affiliation:
Universite de Geneve
Get access

Extract

      Muse of the unique
      Historical fact, defending with silence
      Some world of yours beholding, a silence
      No explosion can conquer, but a lover's yes
      Has been known to fill.
      W. H. Auden, ‘Homage to Clio’

The Clio and Calliope evoked in the prohemia of Books II and III of Troilus and Criseyde are handily glossed in Chaucer editions as Muses of history and epic poetry respectively, but without citations of sources for these attributions. Stephen A. Barney's notes in The Riverside Chaucer suggest that in both evocations Chaucer is following Statius rather than Dante, and both he and B. A. Windeatt mention the marginal gloss ‘Cleo domina eloquentie’ in MS Harley 2392 of Troilus. Vincent J. DiMarco's note to the name Polymya in Anelida and Arcite identifies her as Muse of ‘sacred song,’ after her name-sense ‘she who is rich in hymns,’ but DiMarco does not elaborate on her pertinence to the context of the poem. There is little in current Chaucer criticism on schemes of attributes for the Muses; and yet without an idea of what values for the Muses Chaucer is drawing upon, it is difficult to appreciate their thematic force in Troilus.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Fordham University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable