No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Pythagoras and Monachism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2016
Extract
The biography of Pythagoras of Samos is embroidered with legend, and what the Neo-Pythagoreans tell us is interwoven with Platonic and Aristotelian ideas. His very name — he whose birth was foretold by the Pythian god, Apollo, or he who utters oracles as does Apollo — gives a hint of the mystery enveloping his personality. This at least is certain, that he was born about 580 B.C. as the son of a well-to-do merchant, Mnesarchus. Tradition has it that as a young man he spent a fairly long period in Egypt in order to familiarize himself with the cults of Isis and Osiris. There, too, so runs the tale, he acquired his mathematical knowledge from which he later developed his system of numbers. Upon his return to Greece, he visited first of all such religious centers as Delphi, Delos and Crete with a view to initiation in their mystic rites. In his native island, Samos, he then began to teach, but dissastisfied with the rule of Polycrates the tyrant, he soon resolved to seek out the Greek colonies of Southern Italy.
Information
- Type
- Miscellany
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Fordham University Press
References
1 Burnet, J., ‘Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism,’ Hastings’ Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics (Edinburgh and New York 1908–1927) 10.520–530; Schmid, W. - Stählin, O., Geschichte der griechischen Literatur I 1 (München 1929) 732–741; the collection of relevant texts for both biography and doctrine, Diels, H., Fragmente der Vorsokratiker 1 (6th ed. Berlin 1951), is almost too well known to require special citation: Pythagoras, 96–105; Old Pythagoreans, 105–113; Pythagorean School, 446–480. See also Kirk, G. S. and Raven, J. E., The Presocratic Philosophers (Cambridge 1957) 217–231, 236–262, 307–318 (special bibliography, 447–8); Praechter, K., Die Philosophie des Altertums (Berlin 1926) 61–73, 513–524; Zeller, E., Die Philosophie der Griechen I 1 (7th ed. Leipzig, 1923) 361–617, III 2 (5th ed.) 92–175; Nilsson, M. P., Geschichte der griechischen Religion I (München 1941) 662–670, II (ibid. 1950) 396–407; Carcopino, J., La Basilique pythagoricienne de la Porte Majeure (9th ed. Paris 1944) 161–206.Google Scholar
2 Levy, I., Recherches sur les sources de la légende de Pythagore (Paris 1926).Google Scholar
3 Kurt von Fritz, Pythagorean Politics in Southern Italy (New York 1940) 92.Google Scholar
4 The fragments are assembled by Diels, op. cit. 1.478–480, and are discussed at length by Georges Méautis, Recherches sur le Pythagorisme (Recueil de Travaux publiés par la Faculté des Lettres 9; Neuchâtel 1922) 10–18.Google Scholar
5 Atheniensis, Secundus, Sententiae , ed. G. A. Mullach, F., Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum 1 (Paris 1883) 513.Google Scholar
6 Méautis, op. cit. 9–10, following Delatte, A., Études sur la littérature pythagoricienne (Paris 1915), asserts — with good reason — the continuity of the religious and ascetical teachings of the ‘Old’ Pythagorean school; see especially Delatte's chapter, ‘Le catéchisme des Acousmatiques’ (op. cit. 271–312), a commentary on Iamblichus, De Vita Pythagorica, c. 18 (sections 80–89; ed. Deubner, [Teubner 1937] 46.3–52.19). — For completeness of documentation, mention may be made here of ‘The Biographical Tradition — Pythagoras’ (Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 90 [1959] 185–194) by Philip, J. A., whose evaluation of the later biographies of Pythagoras is quite different from that of the present writer.Google Scholar
7 Cicero, Timaeus 1.1: ‘sic iudico, post nobiles Pythagoreos, quorum disciplina exstincta est quodammodo, cum aliquot saecula in Italia Siciliaque viguisset, hunc exstitisse qui illam renovaret’ (M. Tulli Ciceronis Scripta quae manserunt omnia, ed. F. W. Müller, C. [Lipsiae 1898] 4.3.214).Google Scholar
8 8.8.1 (Plutarchi Chaeronensis Moralia recognovit Bernardakis, G. N. 4 [Lipsiae 1892] 336–7).Google Scholar
9 384A; cf. Quintilian, Institutio oratoria 9.4.12.Google Scholar
10 Iamblichus, De Vita Pythagorica (n. 6 above) 25.110–115.Google Scholar
11 The indices to Adam, J.'s edition of the Republic (Cambridge University Press 1920–21) and Taylor, A. E.'s Commentary on Plato's Timaeus (Oxford 1928) are a convenient help to finding the passages in question, to say nothing of the value of the notes on the respective passages. On Pythagoreanism as the background of much of Plato's teaching, see Burnet, J.'s article cited in note 1 above, 528–530. (Alistar Cameron's dissertation, The Pythagorean Background for the Theory of Recollection [Menasha, Wis. 1938] has been inaccessible to the writer.)Google Scholar
12 8.27. Wiersma, W., ‘Das Referat des Alexandros Polyhistor über die pythagoreische Philosophie,’ Mnemosyne, 3.S. 10 (1941) 97–112, concludes that sections 26–30 of Alexander's statement may safely be used as an ‘altpythagoreische Urkunde.’ However, if Festugière is correct (‘Les “Mémoires Pythagoriques” cités par Alexandre Polyhistor,’ Revue des Études grecques 58 [1945] 1–59), these Ὑπομνήματα ‘ne peuvent aucunement servir de source pour la connaissance du pythagorisme originel. Et il faut donc les retirer de la place indue qu'ils occupent dans la dernière édition des Vorsokratiker‘ (p. 59) (‘Neue Diskussion notwendig,’ says Kranz in the ‘Nachtrag zum ersten Band’ of the sixth edition, 503.29–30).Google Scholar
13 Ep. 108.18.Google Scholar
14 Arbesmann, R., ‘Das Fasten bei den Griechen u. Römern,’ Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten 21 (Giessen 1929) 103–107; Haussleiter, J., Der Vegetarismus in der Antike (same series, 24; Berlin 1935) 97–157 (Pythagoras u. die Pythagoreer), 296–314 (Die Wiederbelebung des Vegetarismus bei den Neupythagoreern), 404–409 (three exceptionally interesting bibliographical lists).Google Scholar
15 The brief account given in this and the following paragraph of the Pythagorean ‘novitiate’ is based on chapter 17 of Iamblichus’ Life (ed. Deubner, , 40–42).Google Scholar
16 Diogenes Laërtius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers 8.7 (Loeb Classical Library, II [1931] 326.)Google Scholar
17 Loc. cit. (n. 8 above).Google Scholar
18 Iamblichus, op. cit. 21 (ed. Deubner, 56–58).Google Scholar
19 Moralia 169Ε (On Superstition); 413 B (On the Obsolescence of Oracles).Google Scholar
20 Mullach, op. cit. (n. 5 above) 420–421.Google Scholar
21 Republic 600B.Google Scholar
22 Phaedo 64AB, 67D, 80E, 81A.Google Scholar
23 Diehl, Ernestus, Anthologia Lyrica Graeca 1 (Lipsiae 1922–25) 186–194 (with elaborate apparatus); Van, P. C. der Horst, Les Vers d'or pythagoriciens (Leiden 1932) xxxiv-xxxviii (Date des Χϱυσᾶ Ἔπη). —Mario Meunier, Pythagore, Les Vers d'Or (Paris 1931), published together with a translation of Hierocles’ Commentary; G. Méautis, Le livre de la sagesse pythagoricienne, Traduction et commentaires des Vers Dorés pythagoriciens (Paris 1938). A German translation is to be found in Willmann, O., Pythagoreische Erziehungsweisheit (Freiburg i. Br. 1922) 48–51; the English translation by Nicholas Rowe appeared in London 1719 and was several times thereafter reprinted; the very free French translation by Fabre d'Olivet, first published in 1813, was reprinted with an English version of the French (N. Y. and London 1925). The older French versions (Dacier, 1706; Coupée, 1796), as also the German translation by Gleim, J. W. L. (Halberstadt 1786), have been inaccessible to the author of the present study.Google Scholar
24 Delatte, A., Études (n. 6 above) 45: ‘il me paraît difficile de placer la publication du poème plus tard que le milieu du iiie siècle de notre ère.’Google Scholar
25 Vv. 9–12, 15–16, 21–23 (Van der Horst, op. cit. 1–2).Google Scholar
26 Vv. 40–41. See der Horst's, Van interesting comment, op. cit. 22–25.Google Scholar
27 De Senectute 11.38. See Moricca's, Umberto exceptionally valuable article, ‘L'esame di coscienza e la storia di un precetto pitagorico,’ Il Mondo Classico 10 (1940) 221–244.Google Scholar
28 Republic 521C.Google Scholar
29 Cochrane, C. N., Christianity and Classical Culture (Oxford 1940) IV: ‘Regnum Caesaris Regnum Diaboli’ (especially pages 151–176).Google Scholar
30 Cf. Philostratus, Life of Apollonius of Tyana 6.11 (Apollonius’ reply to his Egyptian critics).Google Scholar
31 Contra Celsum 3.5. (PG 11.988); ed. Koetschau, (Leipzig 1899) 2.247–20. In an earlier passage of this same work (2.12: PG 11.817BC; ed. Koetschau, 1.141.16–17) Origen has already referred to the custom of the Pythagoreans here mentioned, namely, that of erecting a cenotaph to those who have ‘apostatized.’Google Scholar
32 Reference may here be made to Boyance, P.'s stimulating volume, Le culte des Muses chez les philosophes grecs (Paris 1937).Google Scholar
33 Heussi, Karl, Ursprung des Mönchtums (Tübingen 1936) 20.Google Scholar
34 The writer is aware that authorities differ concerning the ‘community of goods’ in Qumran; thus Chaim Rabin, Qumran Studies (Oxford 1957) 22–31, denies any such observance, whereas Hans Bardtke, Die Handschriftenfunde am Roten Meer (Berlin 1958) asserts of the incoming candidate: ‘Er muss sein Vermögen zwangsweise abliefern und lebt in völliger Besitzlosigkeit …’ (207); see also Pesch, W., C.SS.R., ‘Zur Exegese von Mt 6, 19–21 und Lk 12, 33–34,’ Biblica 41 (1960) 364f.Google Scholar
35 Festugière, A. J., ‘Sur le “De Vita Pythagorica” de Jamblique,’ Revue des Études grecques 50 (1937) 478.Google Scholar
36 Reitzenstein, R., Des Athanasius Werk über das Leben des Antonius (Sb. Heidelberg 1914, 8. Abhdl.) 39–40.Google Scholar
37 Id., Historia Monachorum und Historia Lausiaca (Göttingen 1916) 51.1, 61.3.5, 108–9.Google Scholar
38 Op. cit. (n. 36 above) 39–40, 47–48.Google Scholar
39 St. Athanasius, Life of St. Anthony 14 (PG 26.864C).Google Scholar
40 Steidle, Basilius, O.S.B., ‘ “Homo Dei Antonius”: Zum Bild des “Mannes Gottes” im alten Mönchtum,’ Studia Anselmiana 38 (Rome 1956) 148–200. Cf. Ludwig Bieler, Θεῖος Ἀνήϱ (Vienna 1935); also the (unpublished) Königsberg dissertation of Jürgen Miller concerning the origin and significance of the Rule of St. Benedict (1933) 73 (cited by Ernst von Hippel, Die Krieger Gottes [Halle 1936] 70 n. 3), and especially, reference to the fact that there is said to have been a community of Pythagoreans in Nursia, St. Benedict's birthplace.Google Scholar
41 Steidle, op. cit. 182f. Of exceptional value in this connection is the concluding section of Festugière's article cited in note 35 above (pages 489–494), in which certain differences between the Θεῖος Ἀνήϱ and the ἄνθϱωπος Θεoῦ are clearly pointed out.Google Scholar