No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Moreland match revisited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2005
Abstract
An earlier analysis, which yielded an optimal pair of blue and green primaries (436 & 490 nm) for tritanomaloscopy, is reevaluated. That analysis minimized population variance in the mid-match points of color normals by taking into account, for a set of blue and green tritanopic metamers, the contributions of the lens and macular pigment variances and of matching range. The revision to the matching-range contribution takes into account the effect, neglected in the original analysis, of the varying angle between the blue–green primary mixture lines and the corresponding cyan test and yellow desaturant mixture lines. Use is made of new measurements of the macular pigment absorbance spectrum, a new estimate of the lens absorbance spectrum, the population variances of the lens and macular pigment, and of matching-range data for a current Moreland equation. Tritanopic metamers are derived from a revised set of cone fundamentals. The net effect of all of these revisions on the specification of optimal primaries is small (440 and 488 nm). However, larger changes are involved in the choice of test and desaturant wavelengths.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2004 Cambridge University Press
References
REFERENCES
Bone, R.A. &
Sparrock, J.M.B.
(1971).
Comparison of macular pigment densities in human eyes.
Vision Research
11,
1057–1064.Google Scholar
Bone, R.A.,
Landrum, J.T., &
Cains, A.
(1992).
Optical density of the macular pigment in vivo and in
vitro.
Vision Research
32,
105–110.Google Scholar
Hammond, B.R.,
Wooten, B.R., &
Snodderly, D.M.
(1997).
Individual variations in the spatial profile of human macular
pigment.
Journal of the Optical Society of America A
14,
1187–1196.Google Scholar
He, J.C. &
Shevell, S.K.
(1994).
Individual differences in cone photopigments of normal trichromats
measured by dual Rayleigh-type color matches.
Vision Research
34,
367–376.Google Scholar
Moreland, J.D.
(1978).
Temporal variations in anomaloscope matches.
Modern Problems in Ophthalmology
19,
167–172.Google Scholar
Moreland, J.D.
(1984).
Analysis of variance in anomaloscope equations.
Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series
39,
111–119.Google Scholar
Moreland, J.D. &
Kerr, J.
(1978).
Optimisation of stimuli for trit-anomaloscopy.
Modern Problems in Ophthalmology
19,
162–166.Google Scholar
Moreland, J.D. &
Kerr, J.
(1979).
Optimisation of a Rayleigh-type equation for the detection of
tritanomaly.
Vision Research
19,
1369–1375.Google Scholar
Moreland, J.D.,
Torczynski, E., &
Tripathi, R.
(1991).
Rayleigh and Moreland matches in the ageing eye.
Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series
54,
347–352.Google Scholar
Oculus
(2000).
The HMC Anomaloskop Instruction Manual.
Wetzlar:
Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH.
Pelizzone, M.,
Sommerhalder, J.,
Roth, A., &
Hermés, D.
(1991).
Automated Rayleigh and Moreland matches on a computer-controlled
anomaloscope.
Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series
54,
151–159.Google Scholar
Pokorny, J.,
Smith, V.C., &
Went, L.N.
(1981).
Color matching in autosomal dominant tritan defect.
Journal Optical Society of America
71,
1327–1334.Google Scholar
Pokorny, J.,
Smith, V.C., &
Lutze, M.
(1987).
Aging of the human lens.
Applied Optics
26,
1437–1440.Google Scholar
Rossillion, B.,
Pelizzone, M.,
Sommerhalder, J., &
Roth, A.
(1995).
Automated Moreland equations on 7° and 2° fields.
Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series
57,
481–488.Google Scholar
Roth, A.,
Pelizzone, M.,
Sommerhalder, J.,
Hermés, D., &
Simona, F.
(1991).
The two equation method: III. Results in normal subjects above 50
years of age. Correlation with lens opacity.
Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series
54,
353–359.Google Scholar
Sharpe, L.T.,
Stockman, A.,
Jägle, H., &
Knau, H.,
Nathans, J.
(1999a).
L, M and L-M hybrid cone photopigments in man: Deriving
λmax from flicker photometric spectral
sensitivities.
Vision Research
39,
3513–3525.Google Scholar
Sharpe, L.T.,
Stockman, A.,
Jägle, H., &
Nathans, J.
(1999b).
Opsin genes, cone photopigments, color vision, and color
blindness. In
Color Vision from Genes to Perception, ed.
Gegenfurtner, K.R. &
Sharpe, L.T., pp.
3–51.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Stockman, A. &
Sharpe, L.T.
(2000a).
The spectral sensitivities of the middle- and
long-wavelength-sensitive cones derived from measurements in observers
of known genotype.
Vision Research
40,
1711–1737
and web site http://cvrl.ucl.ac.uk/database.Google Scholar
Stockman, A. &
Sharpe, L.T.
(2000b).
Tritanopic color matches and the middle- and
long-wavelength-sensitive cone spectral sensitivities.
Vision Research
40,
1739–1750.Google Scholar
Thomson, L.C. &
Wright, W.D.
(1953).
The convergence of the tritanopic confusion loci and the derivation
of the fundamental response functions.
Journal of the Optical Society of America
43,
890–894.Google Scholar
van Norren, D. &
Vos, J.J.
(1974).
Spectral transmission of the human ocular media
Vision Research
14,
1237–1244.Google Scholar
Vos, J.J.
(1972).
Literature review of human macular absorption in the visible and its
consequences for the cone receptor primaries. RVO-TNO, IZF
1972–17.
Soersterberg, The Netherlands:
Institute for Perception.
Walraven, P.L.A.
(1974).
A closer look at the tritanopic convergence point.
Vision Research
14,
1339–1343.Google Scholar
Weale, R.A.
(1988).
Age and the transmittance of the human crystalline lens.
Journal of Physiology
395,
577–587.Google Scholar
Wright, W.D.
(1946).
Researches on Normal and Defective Colour Vision.
London, UK:
H. Kimpton.
Wyszecki, G. &
Stiles, W.S.
(1967).
Color Science,
2nd edition 1982.
New York:
Wiley.
Zaidi, Q.,
Pokorny, J., &
Smith, V.C.
(1989).
Sources of individual differences in anomaloscope equations for
tritan defects.
Clinical Vision Science
4,
89–94.Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by