Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T16:09:22.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pattern-reversal electroretinogram in response to chromatic stimuli: I Humans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Concetta Morrone,
Vittorio Porciatti,
Adriana Fiorentini and
David C. Burr
Concetta Morrone
Affiliation:
Istituto di Neurofisiologia del CNR, via S. Zeno 51, Pisa, Italy
Vittorio Porciatti
Affiliation:
Istituto di Neurofisiologia del CNR, via S. Zeno 51, Pisa, Italy
Adriana Fiorentini
Affiliation:
Istituto di Neurofisiologia del CNR, via S. Zeno 51, Pisa, Italy
David C. Burr
Affiliation:
Istituto di Neurofisiologia del CNR, via S. Zeno 51, Pisa, Italy
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have studied the steady-state PERG in human subjects in response to red-green plaid patterns modulated either in luminance or in chromaticity or both. By varying the relative luminance of the red and green components, a value could be obtained at which the PERG amplitude was either minimum or locally maximum. This always occurred at equiluminance, as measured by standard psychophysical techniques. PERG amplitude and phase were measured as a function of spatial and temporal frequency of sinusoidal contrast reversal. In both space and time, the response to chromatic patterns was low-pass, while that to luminance was band-pass, and extended to higher spatial and temporal frequencies. The phase of the PERG to chromatic stimuli was systematically lagged compared with that to luminance stimuli, by an amount corresponding to about 20 ms under our experimental conditions. The variation of phase with temporal frequency suggested an apparent latency of about 67 ms for color contrast compared with 47 ms for luminance. These estimates were confirmed with separate measurements of transient PERGs to abrupt contrast reversal. For both luminance and chromatic stimuli, the amplitude of PERGs increases with increasing stimulus contrast. By summing vectorially the responses to appropriate luminance and chromatic contrasts, we were able to predict with accuracy the response as a function of color ratio (ratio of red to total luminance). The above findings all agree with those reported in the accompanying paper for the monkey PERG (Morrone et al., 1994), and indicate that the differences in response latency and integration time of luminance and chromatic stimuli observed by psychophysical and VEP techniques may arise at least in part from the properties of retinal mechanisms.

Keywords

VisionElectroretinogramColor

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , September 1994, pp. 861 - 871
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arden, G.B. & Vaegan, (1983). Electroretinograms evoked in man by local uniform or patterned stimulation. Journal of Physiology (London) 341, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach, M. & Gerling, J. (1992). Retinal and cortical activity in human subjects during color flicker fusion. Vision Research 32, 1219–1223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, C.L. & Hess, R.F. (1984). Linear and nonlinear components of human electroretinogram. Journal of Neurophysiology 51, 952–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berninger, T.A., Arden, G.B., Hogg, C.R. & Frumkes, T. (1989). Separable evoked retinal and cortical potentials from each major visual pathway: Preliminary results. British Journal of Ophthalmology 73, 502–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowen, R.W. (1981). Latencies for chromatic and achromatic visual mechanisms. Vision Research 21, 1457–1466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burr, D.C. & Morrone, M.C. (1993). Impulse response functions for chromatic and achromatic stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 10, 1706–1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorentini, A., Burr, D.C. & Morrone, M.C. (1991). Spatial and temporal characteristics of colour vision: VEP and psychophysical measurements. In From Pigments to Perception: Advances in Understanding Visual Processing, ed. Valberg, A. & Lee, B.B., pp. 139–150. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorentini, A., Maffei, L., Pirchio, M., Spinelli, D. & Porciatti, V. (1981). The ERG in response to alternating gratings in patients with diseases of the peripheral visual pathway. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 21, 490–493.Google Scholar
Fiorentini, A. & Trimarchi, C. (1992). Development of temporal properties of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in infants. Vision Research 32, 1609–1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flitcroft, D.I. (1989). The interactions between chromatic aberration, defocus and stimulus chromaticity: Implications for visual physiology and colorimetry. Vision Research 29, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korth, M. & Horn, F. (1992). Color contrast mechanisms in the human pattern ERG. Clinical Vision Sciences 7, 293–304.Google Scholar
Korth, M., Nguyen, N.X., Rix, R. & Sembritzki, O. (1993). Spatial and chromatic interactions in the human pattern electroretinogram. Vision Research 33, 275–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korth, M. & Rix, R. (1988) Luminance-contrast evoked responses and color-contrast evoked responses in the human electroretinogram. Vision Research 28, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulikowski, J.J. & Russell, M.H.A. (1989). Electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials elicited by chromatic and achromatic gratings. In Seeing Contour and Colour, ed. Kulikowski, J.J., Murray, I.J. & Dickinson, C.M., pp. 463–466. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Leventhal, A.G., Rodieck, R.W. & Dreher, B. (1981). Retinal ganglion cell classes in the Old World monkey: Morphology and central projections. Science 213, 1139–1142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maffei, L. & Fiorentini, A. (1981). Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings before and after section of the optic nerve. Science 211, 953–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maffei, L. & Fiorentini, A. (1982). Electroretinographic responses to alternating gratings in the cat. Experimental Brain Research 48, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maffei, L., Fiorentini, A., Bisti, S. & Hollaender, H. (1985). Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve. Experimental Brain Research 59, 423–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrone, M.C. & Bedarida, L. (1994). A model of cone adaptation, (in preparation).Google Scholar
Morrone, M.C., Fiorentini, A., Bisti, S., Porciatti, V. & Burr, D.C. (1994). Pattern-reversal electroretinogram in response to chromatic stimuli: II monkey. Visual Neuroscience 11, 873–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, K.T. (1985). The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red-green and blue-yellow gratings. Journal of Physiology (London) 359, 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, M.J. & Pokorny, J. (1977). Wavelength effects on simple reaction times. Perception and Psychophysics 22, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, M.J., Pokorny, J. & Smith, V. (1979). Chromatic information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology (Perception and Performance) 5, 406–419.Google ScholarPubMed
Perry, V.H., Oehler, R. & Cowey, A. (1984). Retinal ganglion cells that project to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey. Neuroscience 12, 1101–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, G.T., Hess, R.F. & Thomas, S.J. (1986). The pattern evoked electroretinogram in optic neuritis. Brain 109, 469–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porciatti, V., Burr, D.C., Morrone, M.C. & Fiorentini, A. (1992 a). The effects of ageing on the pattern electroretinogram and visual evoked potential in humans. Vision Research 32, 1199–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porciatti, V., Fiorentini, A., Morrone, M.C. & Burr, D.C. (1992 b). Steady-state pattern electro-retinogram to equiluminant stimuli. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 33, 710.Google Scholar
Porciatti, V., Fiorentini, A., Morrone, M.C. & Burr, D.C. (1992 c). Temporal properties of the pattern electroretinogram in response to equiluminant stimuli. Perception 21, 33.Google Scholar
Regan, D. (1966). Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 20, 238–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapley, R. & Perry, H. (1986). Cat and monkey retinal ganglion cells and their visual functional roles. Trends in Neuroscience 5, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V.C. & Pokorny, J. (1975). Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm. Vision Research 15, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stromeyer, C.F. III, Cole, G.R. & Kronauer, R.E. (1985). Second-site adaptation in the red-green chromatic pathways. Vision Research 25, 219–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, W.H., Uneno, T., Smith, V.C. & Pokorny, J. (1987). Temporal modulation sensitivity and pulse-duration thresholds for chromatic and luminance perturbations. Journal of the Optical Society of America 4, 1992–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. & Drasdo, N. (1989). The effect of stimulus contrast on the latency and amplitude of the pattern electroretinogram. Vision Research 29, 309–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zrenner, E. (1990). The physiological basis of the pattern electroretinogram. In Progress in Retinal Research, Vol. 9, ed. Osborne, N. & Chader, G., pp. 427–464. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar