Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:29:29.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digital Ethnography in Third Sector Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Ayelet OregOpen the ORCID record for Ayelet Oreg[Opens in a new window] and
Deby Babis
Ayelet Oreg*
Affiliation:
The Louis & Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel
Deby Babis*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel
*
ayelet.oreg@biu.ac.il
deby.babis@gmail.com
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ethnographies involve the exploration of social phenomena in the field, typically for an extended period of time. Traditionally, ethnographers listen to, observe, and directly communicate with the subjects of their research. At its essence, ethnography is about storytelling, and the data are collected through human interaction. With the development of new technologies, and with the plethora of social media platforms, the manner in which many stories are told has become significantly more varied. Accordingly, digital ethnography has emerged as a new approach to conducting ethnographies. In the present study, we focus specifically on the use of digital ethnographies in third sector studies. Building on our own experience using digital ethnography, collecting data from Facebook pages and groups, blogs, and websites of nonprofit organizations and individual volunteers and donors, we describe two different ways of conducting digital ethnography: One, at the micro-level, explores human milk donations to nonprofit milk banks. The second, at the meso-level, explores a community of migrant workers. We aim to outline the potential, limitations, and ethical considerations of this methodology.

Keywords

Digital ethnographySocial mediaThird sectorHuman milkMigrant workers

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 2023, pp. 12 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © International Society for Third-Sector Research 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Appe, S., & Oreg, A. (2019). Lost and found in Upstate New York: Exploring the motivations of “Lost Boys” refugees as founders of international nonprofit organizations. Administration & Society, 52(8), 1209–1238. doi: 10.1177/0095399719890311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appe, S., & Oreg, A. (2020). Philanthropic entrepreneurs who give overseas: An exploratory study of international giving through grassroots organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(3), 502–522. doi: 10.1177/0899764019878785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babis, D. (2018). Exploring the emergence of traditional healer organizations: The case of an ethno-medical association in Bolivia. Health Sociology Review, 27(2), 136–152. doi: 10.1080/14461242.2018.1452624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babis, D. (2021a). Digital mourning on Facebook: The case of Filipino migrant worker live-in caregivers in Israel. Media, Culture & Society, 43(3), 397–410. doi: 10.1177/0163443720957550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babis, D. (2021b). Inclusion and beauty pageants? The Filipino migrant worker community in Israel. Gender, Place & Culture. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2021.1887090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babis & Sabar. (2021). Filipino migrant caregivers in Israel during COVID-19: Enhancing communal social capital via Facebook. (Manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
Babis, D., Zychlinski, E., & Kagan, M. (2021). Comparing transnational and communal diaspora philanthropies among temporary migrant workers: The case of the Filipino community in Israel. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(2), 372–382. doi: 10.1007/s11266-020-00304-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barratt, M. J., & Maddox, A. (2016). Active engagement with stigmatized communities through digital ethnography. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 701–719. doi: 10.1177/1468794116648766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baym, N. K., & Markham, A. N. (Eds.). (2009). Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. A., Lambright, K. T., & Wells, C. J. (2014). Looking for friends, fans, and followers? Social media use in public and nonprofit human services. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 655–663. doi: 10.1111/puar.12261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. A., & Lambright, K. T. (2019). Are you out there? Internet presence of nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(6), 1296–1311. doi: 10.1177/0899764019852673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. A., & Lambright, K. T. (2020). Terms of engagement: Facebook and twitter use among nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(4), 545–568. doi: 10.1002/nml.21403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coover, R. (2004). Using digital media tools in cross-cultural research, analysis and representation. Visual Studies, 19(1), 6–25. doi: 10.1080/1472586042000232608.Google Scholar
Crichton, S., & Kinash, S. (2003). Virtual ethnography: Interactive interviewing online as method. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 29(2).Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. (1999). Cybertalk and the method of instances. In Jones, S. G. (Ed.), Doing internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net. Sage. pp. 107–26. doi: 10.4135/9781452231471.n5.Google Scholar
Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I., Bechkoff, J., & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(1), 52–84. doi: 10.1177/0891241607310839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge doi: 10.4324/9780203793206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golan, O., & Babis, D. (2019a). Towards professionalism through social networks: Constructing an occupational community via Facebook usage by temporary migrant workers from the Philippines. Information, Communication & Society, 22(9), 1230–1252. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1411520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golan, O., & Babis, D. (2019b). Digital host national identification among Filipino temporary migrant workers. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(2), 164–180. doi: 10.1080/01292986.2018.1541097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, M., & Ritzer, G. (2007). Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Routledge: Abingdon, 10, 9781405165518.Google Scholar
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage doi: 10.4135/9780857020277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, C. (2007). Connective ethnography for the exploration of e-science. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 618–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00341.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, C. H., Chiu, K. H., Chen, H., & Papazafeiropoulou, A. (2015). Can internet blogs be used as an effective advertising tool? The role of product blog type and brand awareness. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 346–362. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-03-2014-0021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, P. N. (2002). Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New media, new organizations, new methods. New Media and Society, 4(4), 550–574. doi: 10.1177/146144402321466813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihm, J. (2017). Classifying and relating different types of online and offline volunteering. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 400–419. doi: 10.1007/s11266-016-9826-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jong, S. T. (2017). Netnography:Researching online populations. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences.10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_17-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur‐Gill, S., & Dutta, M. J. (2017). Digital ethnography. The international encyclopedia of communication research methods, pp. 1–10.10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley-Browne, E. (2011). Cyber-Ethnography: The emerging research approach for 21st century research investigation. In Handbook of Research on Transformative Online Education and Liberation: Models for Social Equality (pp. 330–238). IGI Global.Google Scholar
Keim-Malpass, J., Steeves, R. H., & Kennedy, C. (2014). Internet ethnography: A review of methodological considerations for studying online illness blogs. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(12), 1686–1692. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.06.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubitschko, S., & Kaun, A. (Eds.). (2016). Innovative methods in media and communication research. Springer International Publishing. Chicago.10.1007/978-3-319-40700-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine Daniel, J., & Eckerd, A. (2019). Organizational sensegiving: Indicators and nonprofit signaling. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(2), 213–231. doi: 10.1002/nml.21383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, A. N. (2005). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research SAGE.Google Scholar
Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). Internet. Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42(5), 837–855. doi: 10.1177/0038038508094565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreg, A. (2019). Milk donation after losing one's baby: Adopting a donor identity as a means of coping with loss. Social Science & Medicine, 238 112519 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112519112519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oreg, A. (2020) The grief ritual of extracting and donating human milk after perinatal loss. Social Science & Medicine, 113312.10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreg, A., & Appe, S. (2020). “Ain’t no hood like motherhood”: The complexity of human milk donor identity. Social Science Quarterly, 101(2), 439–458. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallas, C. L., Gethings, D., & Harris, M. (2015). Do the right thing: The impact of INGO legitimacy standards on stakeholder input. VOLUNTA: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(4), 1261–1287. doi: 10.1007/s11266-014-9475-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pink, S., Ardèvol, E., & Lanzeni, D. (2016). Digital materiality. Digital materialities: Design and anthropology, 1.Google Scholar
Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123–134. doi: 10.1177/1329878X1214500114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L., Smith, L., & Pollock, C. (2004). Conducting ethical research online: Respect for individuals, identities and the ownership of words. In Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies (pp. 156–173). IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-59140-152-0.ch009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, L., & Schulz, J. (2009). New avenues for sociological inquiry: Evolving forms of ethnographic practice. Sociology, 43(4), 685–698. doi: 10.1177/0038038509105415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabar, G., Babis, D., & Sabar Ben-Yehoshua, N. (2021). From fragility to empowerment through philanthropy: The Filipino labor migrant community in Israel during COVID-19. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2021.1898074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scurlock, R., Dolsak, N., & Prakash, A. (2020). Recovering from Scandals: Twitter coverage of oxfam and save the children Scandals. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(1), 94–110. doi: 10.1007/s11266-019-00148-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varis, P. (2016). Digital ethnography. The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication, pp. 55–68.Google Scholar
Waskul, D., & Douglas, M. (1996). Considering the electronic participant: Some polemical observations on the ethics of on-line research. Information Society, 12, 129–139. doi: 10.1080/713856142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, R. D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations' use of the internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the internet sites of the philanthropy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(1), 59–76. doi: 10.1002/nml.171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, R. D., & Lo, K. D. (2012). Exploring the impact of culture in the social media sphere: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ use of facebook. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41(3), 297–319. doi: 10.1080/17475759.2012.728772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorn, T. E., Grant, S., & Henderson, A. (2013). Strengthening resource mobilization chains: Developing the social media competencies of community and voluntary organizations in New Zealand. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(3), 666–687. doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9265-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, H., & Ye, S. (2019). Legitimacy, worthiness, and social network: An empirical study of the key factors influencing crowdfunding outcomes for nonprofit projects. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(4), 849–864. doi: 10.1007/s11266-018-0004-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar