Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T06:33:23.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a Descriptive Model of Humanitarian Assistance Coordination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Max Stephenson Jr.
Max Stephenson Jr.*
Affiliation:
Institute for Governance and Accountabilities, School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
*
2Correspondence should be directed to Max Stephenson Jr., Institute for Governance and Accountabilities, School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Tech, 103 Architecture Annex, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA; e-mail: mstephen@vt.edu
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that the operating environment of humanitarian assistance is best conceived as an interorganizational social network or regime and that the problem of power and authority in such situations must be re-founded or reconceived accordingly. This contention is developed to contribute to an important ongoing dialogue among analysts concerning how humanitarian aid may most effectively be delivered in the context of a realistic appraisal of the structural and operating conditions in which it is offered. The paper first outlines the primary elements of the organizational environment in which humanitarian efforts must proceed, next suggests a way of thinking about how one might conceive of those conditions that builds on recent work, and then sketches the elements of a strategic contingency approach to the humanitarian assistance coordination dilemma. This analytical frame leads one to rethink assumptions concerning how best to conceptualize both the environment and the behavior of humanitarian organizations engaged in providing assistance in emergency situations and to suggest that theory building for this domain of study should now turn to a network-based and strategically contingent perspective for its foundation.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article argumente que l’environnement opérationnel de l’assistance humanitaire ce conçoit mieux en tant que réseau ou régime social inter organisation et que le problème de puissance et d’autorité dans de telles situations doit être refondé et reconçu en conséquence. Cette assertion est développée pour contribuer à un dialogue continu parmi les analystes en ce qui concerne la manière de délivrer le plus efficacement l’aide humanitaire dans le contexte d’une évaluation réaliste des conditions structurelles et opérationnelles dans lesquel elle est proposée. L’article expose en premier les éléments primaires de l’environnement organisationnel dans lequel les efforts humanitaires doivent être poursuivis, le suivant suggère un axe de réflexion basé sur un travail récent, sur comment pourrait-on concevoir ces conditions, et ensuite décrire les éléments d’une approche stratégique possible au dilemme de la coordination de l’assistance humanitaire. Cette structure analytique nous amène à repenser les hypothèses en ce qui concerne la manière de mieux conceptualiser à la fois l’environnement et le comportement des organisations humanitaires engagées dans la délivrance d’assistance dans les situations d’urgence et à proposer que la théorique dans ce domaine d’étude devrait maintenant se transformer en un réseau structuré et une éventuelle perspective stratégique pour sa fondation.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag argumentiert daß die operative Umgebung humanitärer Hilfe am besten aufgefaßt werden soll als ein inter-organisationales soziales Netzwerk oder System, und daß das Problem der Macht und Autorität in solchen Situationen entsprechend neubegründet oder neukonzipiert werden soll. Diese Behauptung wurde entwickelt um bei zu tragen an einem wichtigen, fortlaufenden Dialog unter Problemanalytikern darüber, wie humanitäre Hilfe am wirksamsten erteilt werden kann im Rahmen einer realistischen Einschätzung der strukturellen und operativen Gegebenheiten unter welchen sie geboten wird. Der Artikel umreißt zunächst die wichtigsten Elemente der organisatorischen Umgebung in der die humanitäre Anstrengungen verlaufen müssen, schlägt alsdann eine auf rezentem Werk aufbauende Methode vor, wie man sich solche Bedingungen vorstellen kann, und verfolgt mit einer Skizze der Elemente eines Ansatzes strategischer Nachhaltigkeit im Dilemma der Koordination humanitärer Hilfe.

Dieser analytische Rahmen bewegt einem dazu die Annahmen zu überdenken, wie man am besten sowohl die Umgebung als auch das Verhalten humanitärer Organisationen, die sich mit Hilfeleistung in Notfallsituationen befassen, konzeptualisiert, und legt nahe daß die Theoriebildung für diesen Forschungsbereich sich jetzt einer Netzwerk-basierten und strategisch-kontingenten Perspektive als Grundlage zuwenden soll.

Resumen

Resumen

This paper argues that the operating environment of humanitarian assistance is best conceived as an inter-organizational social network or regime and that the problem of power and authority in such situations must be re-founded or reconceived accordingly. El presente trabajo afirma que se debe concebir el entorno activo de las asociaciones humanitarias como una red o régimen social interorganizacional, y que el problema del poder y la autoridad en dichas situaciones debe ser reconsiderado y redefinido en consecuencia. This contention is developed to contribute to an important ongoing dialogue among analysts concerning how humanitarian aid may most effectively be delivered in the context of a realistic appraisal of the structural and operating conditions in which it is offered. La finalidad de esta discusión es contribuir al establecimiento de un diálogo constructivo y continuo entre los analistas, relativo a cómo repartir de forma más efectiva la ayuda humanitaria, evaluando de forma realista las condiciones estructurales y operativas en las que se ofrece dicha ayuda. The paper first outlines the primary elements of the organizational environment in which humanitarian efforts must proceed, next suggests a way of thinking about how one might conceive of those conditions that builds on recent work, and then sketches the elements of a strategic contingency approach to the humanitarian assistance coordination dilemma. El trabajo destaca, en primer lugar, los elementos esenciales organizativos que deben regir los esfuerzos humanitarios, para después sugerir una idea de dichas condiciones, basada en actividades recientes. Por último, describe los elementos estratégicos de aproximación al dilema de la coordinación de la ayuda humanitaria. This analytical frame leads one to rethink assumptions concerning how best to conceptualize both the environment and the behavior of humanitarian organizations engaged in providing assistance in emergency situations and to suggest that theory building for this domain of study should now turn to a network-based and strategically contingent perspective for its foundation. Este análisis nos lleva a reconsiderar ideas aceptadas sobre cómo conceptuar mejor el entorno y el comportamiento de las organizaciones humanitarias, encargadas de proporcionar ayuda en situaciones de emergencia, y a sugerir que las teorías dentro de este ámbito deberían basarse en una perspectiva estratégicamente contingente, basada en la red.

Keywords

humanitarian assistance coordinationsocial networksstrategic contingency frameworkstakeholder learning

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2006, pp. 41 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Baumgartner, F. R., and Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Borton, J. (1993). Recent trends in the International Relief System. Disasters 17(3), 187–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1993.tb00493.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daboub, A. J., and Calton, J. M. (2002). Stakeholder learning dialogues: How to preserve ethical responsibility in networks. Journal of Business Ethics 41, 85–98. doi: 10.1023/A:1021302206747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist (2004). Fleeing the horsemen who kill for Khartoum. May 15, pp. 21–23.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. (ed.), (1988). Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Glynn, M. A., Barr, P. S., and Dacin, M. T. (2000). Pluralism and the problem of variety. Academy of Management Review 25(4), 726–734. doi: 10.2307/259201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38(1), 85–112. doi: 10.2307/256729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hock, D. (1999). Birth of the Chaordic Age, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
ICRC (1994). Principles of conduct for The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and NGOs in disaster response programmes. Online: www.ifrc.orgGoogle Scholar
Kent, R. C. (1987). Anatomy of Disaster Relief: The International Network in Action, Pinter Publishers, London.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M., and Tsai, W. (2003). Social Networks and Organizations, Sage Publications, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouzes, J. M., and Posner, B. Z. (2002). The Leadership Challenge, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior 13, 191–228.Google Scholar
McNamee, S. K. J., and Gergen, K. J. (1999). Relational Responsibility: Resources for Sustainable Dialogue, Sage. Thousand Oaks, CA.10.4135/9781452243733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minear, L. (2002). The Humanitarian Enterprise: Dilemmas and Discoveries, Kumarian Press, Bloomfield, CT.Google Scholar
O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review 57(1), 45–52. doi: 10.2307/976691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raab, J., and Milward, H. B. (2003). Dark networks as problems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(4), pp. 413–439. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mug029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reindorp, N. (2002). Trends and challenges in the UN humanitarian system. In: Macrae, J. (ed.), The New Humanitarianisms: A Review of Trends in Global Humanitarian Action, Humanitarian Policy Group Report 11, Overseas Development Group, London.Google Scholar
Reindorp, N., and Wiles, P. (2001). Humanitarian coordination: Lessons from recent field experience. Study Commissioned by the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Overseas Development Institute, London.Google Scholar
Ricigliano, R. (2003). Networks of effective action: Implementing an integrated approach to peacebuilding. Security Dialogue 34(4), 445–462. doi: 10.1177/0967010603344005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
Stephenson, M. Jr. (2005). Making humanitarian relief networks more effective: Operational coordination, trust and sense-making. Disasters 29(4), 337–350.10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00296.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stockton, N. (2002). Strategic coordination in Afghanistan. Issue Paper Series, Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit, Kabul, Afghanistan.Google Scholar
Stoker, R. (1991). Reluctant Partners: Implementing Federal Policy, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, C. (1989). Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946–1988, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
Wallis, A. (1994). Networks, Trust and Values, National Civic League Press, Denver, CO.Google Scholar