No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Democratic Participation in Voluntary Associations: A Multilevel Analysis of Sports Clubs in Europe
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2026
Abstract
Non-profit associations are usually democratically organized, and this feature plays a legitimizing role for the public support to associations. This article examines which characteristics at country level, organizational level and individual level can explain variations with regard to member engagement in the association democracy in sports clubs in Europe. The statistical analyses use data on 12,755 members from 642 sports clubs in ten European countries. The findings show that the majority of the members in sports clubs participate in the association democracy, but the level and form of engagement varies considerably. At the country level, no link between the democratic strength and quality of the countries on the one hand and member engagement on the other could be identified. Instead, characteristics at the organizational and individual level were found to be relevant. More concretely, (1) the size of the sports club, (2) the socioeconomic background of the members (gender, age and education), and (3) the way in which the members are involved in and affiliated to the club (engaged in voluntary work, participating in social activities, etc.) were found to be significantly correlated with the engagement of members in the association democracy.
Information
- Type
- Original Paper
- Information
- Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , Volume 30 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 1148 - 1163
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2019
References
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press doi: 10.1515/9781400874569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. J. (1984). Strong democracy. Participatory democracy for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blais, A., Gidengel, E., & Nevitte, N. (2004). Where does turnout decline come from?. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 221–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00152.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, C., Feiler, S., Llopis-Goig, R., Elmose-Østerlund, K., Bürgi, R., & Claes, E., et al. (2017). Characteristics of European sports clubs. A comparison of the structure, management, voluntary work and social integration among sports clubs across ten European countries. Odense: University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Breuer, C., Hoekman, R., Nagel, S., & van der Werff, H. (2015). Sport clubs in Europe. A cross-national comparative perspective. Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-17635-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühlmann, M., Merkel, W., Müller, L., Giebler, H., & Wessels, B. (2012). Demokratiebarometer: ein neues Instrument zur Messung von Demokratiequalität [Democracy Barometer: A new tool for measuring democracy quality]. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 6, 115–159. doi: 10.1007/s12286-012-0129-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffé, H. C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2010). Same game, different rules? Gender differences in political participation. Sex Roles. A Journal of Research, 62(5–6), 318–333. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council of Europe. (2004). European crossroads: Sport—Front door to democracy. In Conference on 13–14 May, 2004: https://www.euractiv.com/section/sports/news/european-countries-debate-benefits-of-sport-for-democracy.Google Scholar
Dean, J. (1995). Reflexive solidarity. Constellation, 2(1), 114–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8675.1995.tb00023.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, P. (2014). Tocqueville did not write about soccer clubs: Participation in voluntary associations and political involvement. In Freise, M. & Hallmann, T. (Eds.), Modernizing democracy? Associations and associating in the 21st century (pp. 45–58). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0485-3_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekker, P., & Uslaner, E. (2001). Social capital and participation in everyday life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Denters, B., Goldsmith, M., Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P. E., & Rose, L. (2014). Size and local democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing doi: 10.4337/9781783478248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckstein, P. P. (2008). Angewandte Statistik mit SPSS. Praktische Einführung für Wirtschaftswissenschaftler [Applied statistics with SPSS. Practical introduction for economists]. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
Eisinger, P. K. (1973). The conditions of protest behaviour in American cities. The American Political Science Review, 67(1), 11–28. doi: 10.2307/1958525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmose-Østerlund, K., & van der Roest, J. W. (2017). Understanding social capital in sports clubs: Participation, duration and social trust. European Journal for Sport and Society, 14(4), 366–386. doi: 10.1080/16138171.2017.1378479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enjolras, B. (2002). The commercialization of voluntary sport organizations in Norway. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3), 352–376. doi: 10.1177/0899764002313003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enjolras, B. & Seippel, Ø. (2001). Norske idrettslag 2000. Struktur, økonomi og frivillige innsats [Norwegian sports clubs 2000. Structure, economy and voluntary action]. Oslo: Institute for Social Research, report 4.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (Ed.). (1995). New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Fahlén, J. (2017). The trust-mistrust dynamic in the public governance of sport: Exploring the legitimacy of performance measurement systems through end-users’ perceptions. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(4), 707–722. doi: 10.1080/19406940.2017.1348965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahlén, J., Stenling, C., & Vestin, L. (2008). Money talks: A qualitative analysis of the organizational change connected with the corporation formation of a voluntary sports club. Sport und Gesellschaft: Sport and Society, 5(2), 153–177. doi: 10.1515/sug-2008-0204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldberg, R. L., & Glenn, E. N. (1983). Incipient workplace democracy among United States clerical workers. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 4(1), 47–67. doi: 10.1177/0143831X8300400104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freise, M., & Hallmann, T. (Eds.). (2014). Modernizing democracy? Associations and associating in the 21st century. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4939-0485-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, A. (2003). Associations and democracy: Between theories, hopes, and realities. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(2003), 515–539. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics and Society, 29, 5–42. doi: 10.1177/0032329201029001002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J., & Zarecki, D. (2011). Size and democracy, revisited. Boston: Paper, Boston University.Google Scholar
Goerres, A. (2007). Why are older people more likely to vote? The impact of ageing on electoral turnout in Europe. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(1), 90–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00243.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M., & Houlihan, B. (2004). Advocacy coalitions and elite sport policy change in Canada and the United Kingdom. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 39(4), 387–403. doi: 10.1177/1012690204049066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundelach, P. (1988). Sociale bevægelser og samfundsændringer [Social movements and social change]. Aarhus: Politica.Google Scholar
Gundelach, P., & Torpe, L. (1997). Social reflexivity, democracy, and new types of citizen involvement in Denmark. In van Deth, J. W. (Ed.), Private groups and public life. Social participation, Voluntary associations, and political involvement in representative democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. (2018). Folkelig Sundhed og foreningsservice? Et debatskrift om DGI gennem 25 år [Public health and association services?]. DGI. Dgi.dk.Google Scholar
Harris, S., Mori, K., & Collins, M. (2009). Great expectations: Voluntary sports clubs and their role in delivering national policy for English sport. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20(4), 405–423. doi: 10.1007/s11266-009-9095-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2012). Multilevel modeling of categorical outcomes using IBM SPSS. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (1994). Associative democracy. New forms of economic and social governance. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. (2002). Renewing democracy through associations. The Political Quarterly, 73, 409–421. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.00495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horch, H. D. (1982). Strukturbesonderheiten freiwilliger Vereinigungen. Analyse und Untersuchung einer alternativen Form menschlichen Zusammenarbeitens [Structural features of voluntary associations. Analysis and study of an alternative form of human cooperation]. Campus Verlag: New York.Google Scholar
Horch, H. D. (1992). Geld, Macht und Engagement in freiwilligen Vereinigungen. Grundlagen einer Wirtschaftssoziologie von Non-Profit-Organisationen [Money, power and commitment in voluntary associations. Foundations of an economic sociology of non-profit organizations]. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Hoskins, B. L., & Mascherini, M. (2009). Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 90, 459–488. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9271-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibsen, B. (1992). Frivilligt arbejde i idrætsforeninger [Voluntary work in sports clubs]. Copenhagen: DHL/Systime.Google Scholar
Ibsen, B., & Levinsen, K. (2016). Unge, foreninger og demokrati [Youth, associations and democracy]. Movements. Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark (p. 03).Google Scholar
Ibsen, B., & Seippel, Ø (2010). Voluntary organized sport in Denmark and Norway. Sport in Society, 13(4), 593–608. doi: 10.1080/17430431003616266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibsen, B., Thøgersen, M., & Levinsen, K. (2013). Kontinuitet og forandring i foreningslivet. Movements. Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark (p. 11).Google Scholar
Kaspersen, L. B., & Ottesen, L. (2007). Associationalism for 150 years and still alive and kicking: Some reflections on Danish civil society. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 4(1), 105–130. doi: 10.1080/13698230108403340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikulis, L. M., & Slack, T. (1995). Sector-specific patterns of organizational design change. Journal of Management Studies, 32, 67–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1995.tb00646.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirbis, A. (2013). Determinants of political participation in Western Europe, East-Central Europe and the post-Yogoslav countries. In Flere, S., Lavric, M., Klanjsek, R., Krajne, M., Musel, B., & Kirbis, A. (Eds.), Problems and prospects of countries of former Yogoslavia. Maribor: Center for the Study of Post-Yugoslav Societies.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (1995). The political opportunity structure of new social movements: Its impact on their mobilization. In Jenkins, J. G. & Klandermans, B. (Eds.), The politics of social protest. Comparative perspectives on states and social movements. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, C. A. (2002). Municipal size and democracy: A critical analysis of the argument of proximity based on the case of Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies, 25(4), 317–332. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.00074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassen, D. D., & Serritzlew, S. (2011). Jurisdiction size and local democracy: Evidence on internal political efficacy from large-scale municipal reform. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 238–258. doi: 10.1017/S000305541100013X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, C. J., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, W. A., & Rossteutscher, S. (2007). Social capital and associations in European democracies. A comparative analysis. Abingdon: Routledge doi: 10.4324/9780203969069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, W. A., & Rossteutscher, S. (2007). Assessing the significance of associational concerns. Leisure, politics and markets. In Maloney, W. A. & Rossteutscher, S. (Eds.), Social capital and associations in European democracies. A comparative analysis. Abingdon: Routledge doi: 10.4324/9780203969069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martiniello, M. (2005). Political participation, mobilization and representation of immigrants and their offspring in Europe. Willy Brandt series of working papers in international migration and ethnic relations 1/05. School of International Migration and Ethnic Relations, Malmö University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125–145. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micheletti, M. (1994). Det civila samhället och staten. Medborgarsammanslutningarnas roll i svensk politik [Civil society and the state. The role of civil society associations in Swedish politics]. Stockholm: Publica-Fritzes.Google Scholar
Ministry of Culture in Denmark. (2016). Idrætspolitiske sigtelinjer [Sport policy guidelines]. Political document. February 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Nagel, S. (2006). Sportvereine im Wandel: Akteurtheoretische Analysen zur Entwicklung von Sportvereinen [Sports clubs in transition: Actor-theoretical analysis on the development of sports clubs]. Schorndorf: Hofmann.Google Scholar
Nagel, S., Schlesinger, T., Wicker, P., Lucassen, J., Hoeckman, R., van der Werff, H., & Breuer, C. (2015). Theoretical framework. In Breuer, C., Hoeckman, R., Nagel, S., & van der Werff, H. (Eds.), Sport Clubs in Europe. A cross-national comparative perspective (pp. 7–27). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17635-2_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Østerlund, K. (2014). Foreningsidrættens sociale kvaliteter. En social kapital inspireret undersøgelse af danske idrætsforeninger og deres medlemmer [Social qualities of sports clubs. A social capital inspired study of Danish sports clubs and their members]. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Østerlund, K., & Seippel, Ø (2013). Does membership in civil society organizations foster social integration? The case of Danish voluntary sport organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 9, 1–23. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2013.847548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511720444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. American Political Science Association, 10(1), 7–19.Google Scholar
Peterson, S., Catásus, H., & Danielsson, E. (2016). Vem håller I klubban? Om demokrati och delaktighet I idrottsföreningar [Democracy and participation in sports associations]. Sweden: Centrum för idrottsforskning.Google Scholar
Putman, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Quintelier, E., & Hooghe, M. (2013). The impact of socio-economic status on political participation. In Demetriou, K. (Ed.), Democracy in transition. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Rossteutscher, S. (Ed.). (2005). Democracy and the role of associations. Routledge.10.4324/9780203358313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safari, A., Salehzadeh, R., & Ghaziasgar, E. (2018). Exploring the antecedents and consequences of organizational democracy. The TQM Journal, 30(1), 74–96. doi: 10.1108/TQM-05-2017-0057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sam, P. M. (2009). The public management of sport. Public Management Review, 11(4), 499–514. doi: 10.1080/14719030902989565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, T., & Nagel, S. (2013). Who will volunteer? Analysing individual and structural factors of volunteering in Swiss sports clubs. European Journal of Sports Science, 13(6), 707–715. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2013.773089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlesinger, T., & Nagel, S. (2015). Does context matter? Analysing structural and individual factors of member commitment in sport clubs. European Journal for Sport and Society, 12(1), 53–77. doi: 10.1080/16138171.2015.11687956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seippel, Ø (2008). Norske idrettslag: 1999–2007 [Norwegian sports clubs: 1999–2007]. Oslo: Akilles.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2011). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stegmueller, D. (2013). How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 748–761. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streek, W. (1995). Inclusion and secession: Questions on the boundaries of associative democracy. In Wright, E. O. (Ed.), Associations and democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Swierzy, P., Wicker, P., & Breuer, C. (2018). Usefulness of multilevel modeling in sport management research. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. doi: 10.1080/1091367x.2018.1438289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, C. (1994). Power in movement, social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Theodoraki, E. I., & Henry, I. (1994). Organizational structures and contexts in British national governing bodies of sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 29, 244–265. doi: 10.1177/101269029402900302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, A., & Mayer, J. (2009). Characteristics of voluntary sports clubs management: A sociological perspective. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9(1), 81–98. doi: 10.1080/16184740802461744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Roest, J. (2016). Consumerism in sport organizations: Conceptualizing and constructing a research scale. European Journal for Sport and Society, 13(4), 362–384. doi: 10.1080/16138171.2016.1253321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Roest, J.-W., Van Kalmthout, J., & Meijs, L. (2016). A consumerist turn in Dutch voluntary sport associations?. European Journal for Sport and Society, 13(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/16138171.2016.1153882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meer, T., & Van Ingen, E. (2009). Schools of democracy? Disentangling the relationship between civic participation and political action in 17 European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 48(2), 281–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00836.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Deth, J. W., Maraffi, M., Newton, K., & Whiteley, P. (2007). Social capital and European democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M. E. (2001). Democracy and association. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400823925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M. E. (2003). The political role of nonprofits in a democracy. Society, 40(4), 46–51. doi: 10.1007/s12115-003-1017-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicker, P., Breuer, C., Lamprecht, M., & Fischer, A. (2014). Does club size matter?. Journal of Sport Management, 28(3), 266–280. doi: 10.1123/jsm.2013-0051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazdani, N. (2010). Organizational democracy and organization structure link: Role of strategic leadership and environmental uncertainty. Journal of the Institute of Business Administration, Karachi, 5(2), 51–73.Google Scholar
- 42
- Cited by