Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T23:47:09.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relevance of Self-Determination for Corporate Volunteering Intentions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Henrieta Hamilton Skurak ,
Sanna Malinen ,
Joana C. Kuntz  and
Katharina Näswall
Henrieta Hamilton Skurak*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Sanna Malinen*
Affiliation:
Department of Management, Marketing and Entrepreneurship, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Joana C. Kuntz*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Katharina Näswall*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
*
Henrieta.HamiltonSkurak@pg.canterbury.ac.nz
Sanna.Malinen@canterbury.ac.nz
Joana.Kuntz@canterbury.ac.nz
Katharina.Naswall@canterbury.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corporate volunteering programs are increasingly used to bolster community involvement, address social issues and improve the reputation of organisations. Despite this growing trend, our understanding of what motivates corporate volunteers is scant. Drawing on self-determination theory, this study investigates motivational differences among employees engaging in different corporate volunteering types and in independent volunteering, and examines the relationships between these volunteering types and employees’ intent to volunteer in the future. Findings obtained from a survey of 318 employees suggest that higher levels of motivation to volunteer for reasons of ego enhancement or guilt prevention (introjection) were associated with a higher likelihood of participation in employer-organised, large-scale volunteering. Lastly, compared to the other types of volunteers, corporate volunteers had the highest intentions to volunteer through their company in the future, while independent volunteers had the highest intentions to continue volunteering in their own time without employer support. These results highlight the importance of offering various types of corporate volunteering opportunities to employees, as people engaging in corporate volunteering do not make up a homogeneous group, and that different corporate volunteering activities fulfil different motivational needs.

Keywords

Self-determinationMotivationCorporate volunteeringJob resources

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations , Volume 30 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 1054 - 1068
Copyright
Copyright © International Society for Third-Sector Research 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, K. (2003). The social case for corporate volunteering. Australian Journal on Volunteering, 8(1), 57–62.Google Scholar
Allen, K. (2012). The big tent. Corporate volunteering in the global age (pp. 3–258). SA: Fundación Telefónica, Editorial Ariel. Retrieved from http://iave.org/iavewp/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/The-Big-Tent-2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99(1), 544–555. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.1.544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and weil-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045–2068. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2008). Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy. Psychology & Marketing, 25(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1002/mar.20200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basil, D. Z., Runte, M. S., Easwaramoorthy, M., & Barr, C. (2009). Company support for employee volunteering: A national survey of companies in Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 387–398. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9741-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidee, J., Vantilborgh, T., Pepermans, R., Huybrechts, G., Willems, J., Jegers, M., & Hofmans, J. (2013). Autonomous motivation stimulates volunteers’ work effort: A self-determination theory approach to volunteerism. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(1), 32–47. doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9269-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors?. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82–98. doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.1580442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolino, M. C., Hsiung, H.-H., Harvey, J., & LePine, J. A. (2015). “Well, I’m tired of tryin’!” Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 56–74. doi: 10.1037/a0037583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2003). Going the extra mile: Cultivating and managing employee citizenship behavior. The Academy of Management Executive, 17(3), 60–71.Google Scholar
Breitsohl, H., & Ehrig, N. (2017). Commitment through employee volunteering: Accounting for the motives of inter-organisational volunteers. Applied Psychology, 66(2), 260–289. doi: 10.1111/apps.12092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, K. D., Lydon, J. E., D’alessandro, D. U., & Koestner, R. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 750–762. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bussell, H., & Forbes, D. (2008). How UK universities engage with their local communities: A study of employer supported volunteering. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(4), 363–378. doi: 10.1002/nvsm.331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, J. Z., Schmidt, A. M., Ford, J. K., & DeShon, R. P. (2003). Climate perceptions matter: A meta-analytic path analysis relating molar climate, cognitive and affective states, and individual level work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 605–619. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatzisarantis, N. L., & Hagger, M. S. (2009). Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation. Psychology and Health, 24(1), 29–48. doi: 10.1080/08870440701809533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chemolli, E., & Gagné, M. (2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 575–585. doi: 10.1037/a0036212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, L. H. (2003). Factors affecting volunteerism among older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 22(2), 179–196. doi: 10.1177/0733464803022002001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., & Ridge, R. (1992). Volunteers’ motivations: A functional strategy for the recruitment, placement, and retention of volunteers. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 2(4), 333–350. doi: 10.1002/nml.4130020403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516–1530. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cnaan, R. A., & Handy, F. (2005). Towards understanding episodic volunteering. Vrijwillige Inzet Onderzocht, 2(1), 29–35.Google Scholar
Cordery, C. J. (2012). Funding social services: An historical analysis of responsibility for citizens’ welfare in New Zealand. Accounting History, 17(3–4), 463–480. doi: 10.1177/1032373212443532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culp, K. III, & Nolan, M. (2000). Trends impacting volunteer administrators in the next ten years. Journal of Volunteer Administration, 19(1), 10–19.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580–590. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. doi: 10.1037/a0012801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deri-Armstrong, C., Devlin, R. A., & Seifi, F. (2016). Build it and they will come: Volunteer opportunities and volunteering (pp. 1–42). Ottawa: Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Do Paço, A., Agostinho, D., & Nave, A. (2013). Corporate versus non-profit volunteering—Do the volunteers’ motivations significantly differ?. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10(3), 221–233. doi: 10.1007/s12208-013-0101-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, E., Farrell, K., & Lawrence, C. (2008). Blood donation is an act of benevolence rather than altruism. Health Psychology, 27(3), 327–336. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199–223. doi: 10.1023/A:1025007614869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, M., Chemolli, E., Forest, J., & Koestner, R. (2008). A temporal analysis of the relation between organisational commitment and work motivation. Psychologica Belgica, 48(2–3), 219–241. doi: 10.5334/pb-48-2-3-219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. doi: 10.1002/job.322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., & Güntert, S. T. (2015). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geroy, G. D., Wright, P. C., & Jacoby, L. (2000). Toward a conceptual framework of employee volunteerism: An aid for the human resource manager. Management Decision, 38(4), 280–287. doi: 10.1108/00251740010326333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. (2012). Giving time, time after time: Work design and sustained employee participation in corporate volunteering. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 589–615. doi: 10.5465/amr.2010.0280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, E. A., & Marks, N. F. (2004). Formal volunteering as a protective factor for older adults’ psychological well-being. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(5), S258–S264. doi: 10.1093/geronb/59.5.S258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagger, M., & Chatzisarantis, N. (2008). Self-determination theory and the psychology of exercise. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 79–103. doi: 10.1080/17509840701827437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haivas, S., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2012). Self-determination theory as a framework for exploring the impact of the organizational context on volunteer motivation: A study of Romanian volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1195–1213. doi: 10.1177/0899764011433041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haski-Leventhal, D., Meijs, L. C., & Hustinx, L. (2010). The third-party model: Enhancing volunteering through governments, corporations and educational institutes. Journal of Social Policy, 39(01), 139–158. doi: 10.1017/S0047279409990377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, M. K., Dunn, J. B., & Chambers, S. K. (2016). Episodic volunteering and retention: An integrated theoretical approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 45. doi: 10.1177/0899764014558934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koestner, R., & Losier, G. F. (2002). Distinguishing three ways of being highly motivated: A closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation. In Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 101–121). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Lavelle, J. J. (2010). What motivates OCB? Insights from the volunteerism literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 918–923. doi: 10.1002/job.644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, L. (2015). Understanding the role of the broker in business non-profit collaboration. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 201–220. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-05-2013-0050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y.-J., & Brudney, J. L. (2009). Rational volunteering: A benefit-cost approach. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 29(9/10), 512–530. doi: 10.1108/01443330910986298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. J., & Brudney, J. L. (2015). Work-to-society spillover?. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(1), 105–119. doi: 10.1002/nml.21146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losier, G. F., & Koestner, R. (1999). Intrinsic versus identified regulation in distinct political campaigns: The consequences of following politics for pleasure versus personal meaningfulness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 287–298. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025003002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macduff, N. (2005). Societal changes and the rise of the episodic volunteer. Emerging Areas of Volunteering, 1(2), 49–61.Google Scholar
Markham, W. T., & Bonjean, C. M. (1996). Employment status and the attitudes and behavior of higher status women volunteers, 1975 and 1992: A case study. Sex Roles, 34(9–10), 695–716. doi: 10.1007/BF01551503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinhard, A., Handy, F., & Greenspan, I. (2010). Corporate participation in the social economy: Employer-supported volunteering programs in Canada’s financial institutions. In Mook, L., Quarter, J., & Ryan, S. (Eds.), Researching the social economy (pp. 245–266). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Moller, A. C., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-determination theory and public policy: Improving the quality of consumer decisions without using coercion. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 104–116. doi: 10.1509/jppm.25.1.104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., Rozario, P. A., & Tang, F. (2003). Effects of volunteering on the well-being of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(3), S137–S145. doi: 10.1093/geronb/58.3.S137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthuri, J., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2009). Employee volunteering and social capital: Contributions to corporate social responsibility. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 75–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00551.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offstein, E. H., Chory, R. M., & Childers, J. S. Jr (2015). A cross-cultural analysis of factors influencing choice in volunteering activities. Competitiveness Review, 25(1), 74–97. doi: 10.1108/CR-05-2013-0054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajo, K., & Lee, L. (2011). Corporate-sponsored volunteering: A work design perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(3), 467–482. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0665-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Brière, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 279–306. doi: 10.1023/A:1014805132406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, L., & Sharp, E. (2008). Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviours: How message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviours through self-determined motivation. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 210–217. doi: 10.1037/a0012755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peloza, J., & Hassay, D. N. (2006). Intra-organizational volunteerism: Good soldiers, good deeds and good politics. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(4), 357–379. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-5496-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peloza, J., Hudson, S., & Hassay, D. N. (2009). The marketing of employee volunteerism. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 371–386. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9734-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. K. (2004). Benefits of participation in corporate volunteer programs: Employees’ perceptions. Personnel Review, 33(6), 615–627. doi: 10.1108/00483480410561510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–141. doi: 10.1037/a0013079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press doi: 10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1966). Freedom and nature: The voluntary and the involuntary (Vol. 1). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Rodell, J. B., Breitsohl, H., Schröder, M., & Keating, D. J. (2016). Employee volunteering: A review and framework for future research. Journal of Management, 42(1), 55–84. doi: 10.1177/0149206315614374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotolo, T., & Wilson, J. (2007). The effects of children and employment status on the volunteer work of American women. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 487–503. doi: 10.1177/0899764006296848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runté, M., & Basil, D. Z. (2011). Personal and corporate volunteerism: Employee motivations. International Journal of Business Environment, 4(2), 133–145. doi: 10.1504/IJBE.2011.040171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In Ames, C. & Ames, R. E. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: The classroom milieu (pp. 13–51). NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1586. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, K., & Cordery, C. J. (2010). What works? A systematic review of research and evaluation literature on encouragement and support of volunteering. Department of Internal Affairs Retrieved from http://www.communitymatters.govt.nz/vwluResources/publications-lottery-WhatWorksVolunteering/$file/publications-lottery-WhatWorksVolunteering.pdf.10.2139/ssrn.1761655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, P. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. doi: 10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Volunteering-mainstream and marginal: Preserving the leisure experience. LSA Publication, 75, 1–10.Google Scholar
Stenius, M., Stenius, M., Hankonen, N., Hankonen, N., Ravaja, N., Ravaja, N., & Haukkala, A. (2016). Why share expertise? A closer look at the quality of motivation to share or withhold knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(2), 181–198. doi: 10.1108/JKM-03-2015-0124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talò, C., Mannarini, T., & Rochira, A. (2014). Sense of community and community participation: A meta-analytic review. Social Indicators Research, 117(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0347-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tschirhart, M., Mesch, D. J., Perry, J. L., Miller, T. K., & Lee, G. (2001). Stipended volunteers: Their goals, experiences, satisfaction, and likelihood of future service. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(3), 422–443. doi: 10.1177/0899764001303002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. doi: 10.1177/0149206316632058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Schie, S., Gautier, A., Pache, A.-C., & Güntert, S. T. (2018). What keeps corporate volunteers engaged: Extending the volunteer work design model with self-determination theory insights. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3926-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Schie, S., Guentert, S. T., & Wehner, T. (2011). No corporate volunteering without volunteers. International Journal of Business Environment, 4(2), 121–132. doi: 10.1504/IJBE.2011.040170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy-supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents’ academic achievement. Child Development, 76(2), 483–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244. doi: 10.1037/a0016984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. R., & Lorenz, K. A. (2015). Modeling binary correlated responses using SAS, SPSS and R. Berlin: Springer doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23805-0 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, H. (2011). Social impact of volunteerism. Atlanta, GA: Points of Light Institute. Retrieved from http://www.pointsoflight.org/sites/default/files/sitecontent/files/social_impact_of_volunteerism_pdf.pdf.Google Scholar