Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T09:23:55.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Basis for Response Differences of Two Broadleaf Weeds to Chlorsulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Larry H. Hageman  and
Richard Behrens
Larry H. Hageman
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genet., Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Richard Behrens
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Plant Genet., Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The basis for differences in response of eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum Dun.), a tolerant species, and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic. ♯3 ABUTH), a susceptible species, to foliar-applied chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]benzenesulfonamide} was investigated by evaluating differences in spray retention and herbicide absorption, translocation, and metabolism. Based upon a foliar-applied rate causing a 50% reduction in dry weight, velvetleaf was greater than 20000 times more susceptible to chlorsulfuron than was eastern black nightshade. The differences detected in spray retention, absorption, and translocation were inadequate to account for the large response differences between the two species. The primary difference found was in the rate of chlorsulfuron degradation. In eastern black nightshade, 69.9% of the absorbed chlorsulfuron was metabolized within 24 h of application and 81.1% within 72 h of application. Only 7.1% of absorbed chlorsulfuron was metabolized in velvetleaf in a 72-h period.

Keywords

AbsorptionmetabolismretentiontranslocationnightshadeSolanum ptycanthumAbutilon theophrastiABUTH

Information

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , March 1984 , pp. 162 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Behrens, R. and Elakkad, M. A. 1978. Herbicide evaluation for weed control in oats and wheat, Rosemount, MN – 1978. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 35:104–105.Google Scholar
2. Behrens, R. and Elakkad, M. A. 1979. Herbicide evaluation for weed control in oats and wheat, Rosemount, MN – 1979. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:83–85.Google Scholar
3. Behrens, R. and Elakkad, M. A. 1980. Herbicide evaluation for weed control in oats and wheat, Rosemount, MN – 1980. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 37:97–99.Google Scholar
4. Behrens, R. and Elakkad, M. A. 1981. Herbicide evaluation for weed control in oats and wheat, Rosemount, MN – 1981. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 38:84–85.Google Scholar
5. Darwent, A. L. and Behrens, R. 1972. Effect of pretreatment environment on 2,4-D phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 20:540–544.Google Scholar
6. Ennis, W. B., Williamson, R. E., and Dorschner, K. P. 1952. Studies on spray retention by leaves of different plants. Weeds 1:274–276.Google Scholar
7. Hawf, L. R. and Behrens, R. 1974. Selectivity factors in the response of plants to 2,4-DB. Weed Sci. 22:245–249.Google Scholar
8. Holly, K. 1976. Selectivity in relation to formulation and application methods. Pages 249–275 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicide–Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology, vol. 2. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
9. Kraatz, G. W. and Andersen, R. N. 1980. Determining projected leaf area in weed control research. Weed Sci. 28:548–550.Google Scholar
10. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1978. Broadleaf weed control in wheat. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 35:123.Google Scholar
11. Nalewaja, J. D. and Miller, S. D. 1979. Broadleaf weed control in wheat. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:97.Google Scholar
12. Sargent, J. A. 1976. Relationship of selectivity to uptake and movement. Pages 303–331 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides–Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology, vol. 2. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
13. Smith, C. W. 1977. Bayes least significant difference: A review and comparison. Agron. J. 70:123–127.Google Scholar
14. Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchison, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:18–23.Google Scholar